Wilson's td catch

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
Stlcrtn1974
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 2:19 pm

Wilson's td catch

Post by Stlcrtn1974 » Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:03 pm

How was that a td but Pickens wasn't.



Deebo
Posts: 2519
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:22 pm

Post by Deebo » Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:26 pm

Stlcrtn1974 wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:03 pm
How was that a td but Pickens wasn't.
It was much different than Pickens'

Initially ruled incomplete because Wilson got only one foot down, the Jets won a replay challenge after officials ruled that his left shin landed inbounds in the back of the end zone. Based on the rules, one shin equals two feet.

Deebo
Posts: 2519
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:22 pm

Post by Deebo » Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:00 pm


Stlcrtn1974
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 2:19 pm

Post by Stlcrtn1974 » Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:05 pm

Deebo wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:26 pm
Stlcrtn1974 wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 12:03 pm
How was that a td but Pickens wasn't.
It was much different than Pickens'

Initially ruled incomplete because Wilson got only one foot down, the Jets won a replay challenge after officials ruled that his left shin landed inbounds in the back of the end zone. Based on the rules, one shin equals two feet.
I thought it was his right, my bad.

Stosh-67
Posts: 11454
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:18 pm

Post by Stosh-67 » Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:22 pm

One foot and then the same shin equals a TD?
One foot and then the same foot does not equal a TD?

Probably in the rules, but...

If Pickens makes that catch, one foot, then same foot down again..........then stands there like a pelican for 10 seconds.......
whistle does not blow....
defenders rolled out of bounds and they are looking at the big screen replay....
Pickens eats a snickers.....
"Tomlin has never appreciated the role of scheme and play call in the ability for player's to execute" Kodiak.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=23975

User avatar
anpsteel
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:47 pm

Post by anpsteel » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:51 pm

To me, his knee, which came down essentially the same time his shin did, landed out of bounds.

That should not have been a catch, imo

User avatar
Dan Smith--BYU
Posts: 2949
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:33 am

Post by Dan Smith--BYU » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:52 pm

Jets beating Texans was a huge boost to Colts, KC, Buff, Balt Pitt.

Also a testament to how much better PS defense is compared to Hou.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

Nietzsche

Jizz Mop
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:44 pm

Post by Jizz Mop » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:54 pm

anpsteel wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:51 pm
To me, his knee, which came down essentially the same time his shin did, landed out of bounds.

That should not have been a catch, imo
Guess they felt the shin landed a millisecond in bounds before the knee landed OOB’s.

GP catch wasn’t a TD. Can we move on?

Deebo
Posts: 2519
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:22 pm

Post by Deebo » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:58 pm

anpsteel wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:51 pm
To me, his knee, which came down essentially the same time his shin did, landed out of bounds.

That should not have been a catch, imo
In my 40 some years of watching football, I have never heard of "shin" being a relevant body part for completing a catch.

John Madden had his trope: 1 knee equals 2 feet

Again I have literally never heard of shin being an important qualifier of a catch. Methinks the NFL wanted the Jets to win and put their thumb on the scale with this review

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:59 pm

Although I am loathe to change rules ever

This one is easy

Any body part comes down inbounds it’s a catch


Why is that a good rule ??

Eliminates confusion and judgement calls
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
anpsteel
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:47 pm

Post by anpsteel » Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:09 pm

Jizz Mop wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:54 pm
anpsteel wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:51 pm
To me, his knee, which came down essentially the same time his shin did, landed out of bounds.

That should not have been a catch, imo
Guess they felt the shin landed a millisecond in bounds before the knee landed OOB’s.

GP catch wasn’t a TD. Can we move on?
Picken's catch was definitely not in bounds

I don't think this was, either

User avatar
anpsteel
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:47 pm

Post by anpsteel » Fri Nov 01, 2024 3:12 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:59 pm
Although I am loathe to change rules ever

This one is easy

Any body part comes down inbounds it’s a catch


Why is that a good rule ??

Eliminates confusion and judgement calls
I'm with you on, "any body part", but if another body part lands out of bounds, simultaneously, that should be ruled incomplete.

I'm not at all clear on how a shin can come down "before" a knee, given general human anatomy.

anywho-

The Entertainment League that has a boat load of money invested in one of the top gambling sites, will continue on.


Edit: Clarifying my comment regarding a shin coming down prior to a knee

Given that your shin is essentially connected to your knee, the lower part of your shin can certainly come down prior to the upper part of your shin and therefore the knee

I suppose this is like saying one end of your forearm can come down before your elbow


But if we are going to start qualifying that my lower shin came down inbound before my upper shinbone came down out of bounds, you might as well say my heel came down inbounds before my toes came down out of bounds


It’s pretty fucking stupid in my opinion
Last edited by anpsteel on Fri Nov 01, 2024 8:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Thrillsseeker
Posts: 5517
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:42 pm

Post by Thrillsseeker » Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:47 pm

Pickens was not in bounds.

Wilson was since 1 shin is = two feet. That’s the rules.

Jizz Mop
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:44 pm

Post by Jizz Mop » Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:10 pm

Thrillsseeker wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:47 pm
Pickens was not in bounds.

Wilson was since 1 shin is = two feet. That’s the rules.
This

User avatar
langer
Posts: 5848
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:13 am

Post by langer » Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:13 pm

ARTICLE 3. COMPLETED OR INTERCEPTED PASS

A player who makes a catch may advance the ball. A forward pass is complete (by the offense) or intercepted (by the defense) in the field of play, at the sideline, or in the end zone if a player, who is inbounds:

secures control of the ball in his hands or arms prior to the ball touching the ground; and
touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands
; and
after (a) and (b) have been fulfilled, performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take an additional step, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent), or he maintains control of the ball long enough to do so.
"I'm institutionalized, man," he joked. "I gotta have it. I just love the challenges week in and week out that this job provides: the growth in it, the collective growth, the individual growth."

User avatar
Dan Smith--BYU
Posts: 2949
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:33 am

Post by Dan Smith--BYU » Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:15 pm

Changing to the college one foot rule makes a lot more sense than banning the cover-2 or other dumb Mel Kiper ideas.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

Nietzsche

Thrillsseeker
Posts: 5517
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:42 pm

Post by Thrillsseeker » Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:56 pm

Dan Smith--BYU wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 6:15 pm
Changing to the college one foot rule makes a lot more sense than banning the cover-2 or other dumb Mel Kiper ideas.

Absolutely. The fact eliminating or banning cover 2 has even been discussed is full on stupid. Absurd, concerning, I could go on.

May just as well put dresses on em. (Heard that somewhere before)

Dipping their toes into the future National Flag Football League to see people’s reaction maybe?

User avatar
anpsteel
Posts: 3727
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:47 pm

Post by anpsteel » Fri Nov 01, 2024 8:23 pm

Thrillsseeker wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:47 pm
Pickens was not in bounds.

Wilson was since 1 shin is = two feet. That’s the rules.
I’m extremely clear Pickens wasn’t in


Not sure why people keep saying this


Pickens being out of bounds has zero to do with Wilson’s catch, which should have also been incomplete, imo.

User avatar
Dan Smith--BYU
Posts: 2949
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:33 am

Post by Dan Smith--BYU » Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:47 pm

May just as well put dresses on em.

or, "may as well let WRs line up 25 yards downfield or implement the soccer offside rule, but only for DBs"
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.

Nietzsche

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 30406
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Sat Nov 02, 2024 1:14 am

Stosh-67 wrote:
Fri Nov 01, 2024 1:22 pm
One foot and then the same shin equals a TD?
One foot and then the same foot does not equal a TD?

Probably in the rules, but...

If Pickens makes that catch, one foot, then same foot down again..........then stands there like a pelican for 10 seconds.......
whistle does not blow....
defenders rolled out of bounds and they are looking at the big screen replay....
Pickens eats a snickers.....
The shin knee shoulder any body part other than foot or hand equals two feet. The fact that his foot touched down is irrelevant.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic