bradshaw2ben wrote:I was shocked today to learn that Nic Williams is still in the NFL.
Where I'm at is pretty close to where you are. What I have a problem with is: Tomlin has enough faults that we don't need to make shit up or imagine more with our crystal balls.
For example: as Ben said in his recent interview, the team was good at scoring late in halves but also failed to add to the lead in 2nd halves. Part of that is the philosophy of the HC (the biggest part), part is personnel, part is OC. But Ramon Foster (who I think is pretty forthright about the team) said he thinks the most irreplaceable part of Tomlin is his ability to deal with all the craziness of the different guys on the team and in the locker room. Despite all the drama that leaks out about Bell and AB, Foster thinks Tomlin is masterful at handling a ton of bullshit we don't even know about. I presume that's true, which is why I don't lay the AB thing at his feet.
The philosophy of how to close out games might be the single worst part of his tenure-- it is certainly the most stale. He should go have a beer with Pete Carroll and they can agree that this concept is passe and should be abolished.
There's a lot of criticisms I can't get behind––just sounds like a lot of emotional attacks because of disappointment/anger. But if you go into a different mindset offensively once you have the lead, then the NFL circa 2018-19 are going to consistently come back to beat you or make every game closer than it needs to be.
But this philosophy is a HUGE DEAL, B2B.
Precisely for this point:
make every game closer than it needs to be.
What happens when you make every game closer than it needs to be?
I'll tell you what happens.
All the shit we complain about- the bad ref's calls...the penalty that stops a drive...the turnover or mistake...the overthrown pass on a key third down- all this shit now has a GREATER IMPACT on the game than it otherwise might have.
We think we have an inordinate amount of bad luck.
In reality, we have the same luck as the other 31 teams in the league...but our philosophy MAGNIFIES the impact of random events.
Oh and by the way, because Mike Tomlin is a results-based evaluator of his decisions...it'll be a real chore convincing him of this.
Easier for him to chalk up a loss to a mistake that "we'll clean up next time" instead trying to figure out how to minimize the impact of random events by changing game management philosophy.
