Get well Le'veon

[Legacy User]

Adam Crowley retweeted
Dale Lolley ‏@dlolleyor 16m16 minutes ago

Just saw Lev Bell at #Steelers facility. Can barely walk

[Legacy User]

Adam Crowley retweeted
Dale Lolley ‏@dlolleyor 16m16 minutes ago

Just saw Lev Bell at #Steelers facility. Can barely walk

Thanks for the update. And hardly surprising. I'm just glad he can walk.

[Legacy User]

Adam Crowley retweeted
Dale Lolley ‏@dlolleyor 16m16 minutes ago

Just saw Lev Bell at #Steelers facility. Can barely walk

saw that...not unexpected..don't think this going to go well..even if he suits up..will be limited to some extent no doubt. Fingers crossed though

[Legacy User]

i think best case scenario...Bell dresses for Saturday, but we start Harris...build up a big lead and don't need his services

he rests for another week and comes back for Denver

[Legacy User]

Adam Crowley retweeted
Dale Lolley ‏@dlolleyor 16m16 minutes ago

Just saw Lev Bell at #Steelers facility. Can barely walk

saw that...not unexpected..don't think this going to go well..even if he suits up..will be limited to some extent no doubt. Fingers crossed though

If he suits up? Holy shit, they had better not let him suit up. I will rage.

[Legacy User]

Bell will be fine.

ya just probably not for sats game.

[Legacy User]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Whats the point of this comment?

[Legacy User]

to offer some perspective, i hope they are considering the long term picture too

Bell is only in his 2nd year...he's team MVP...Allah willing he should be our stud for the next 5-7 years

don't want to risk permanent damage even if it means bowing out early from the playoffs

[Legacy User]

Dale Lolley ‏@dlolleyor 5m5 minutes ago
Just saw Lev Bell at #Steelers facility. Can barely walk

[DP39]

You guys can blame me for Bell's injury.....apparently I messed with "the juju". I'm sure many won't believe this, but I actually was thinking of Bell and a knee when I typed this yesterday afternoon. I didn't say it specifically in fear of "the juju".

http://steelerfury.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2314&start=60

I wrote this, a few hours before the game yesterday, in the SSG thread....
____________________________________________________________
Steelers 30
Bengals 24

Hope this doesn't break any juju rules, but I fear the injury bug tonight....big time!

We've been pretty fortunate as of late, so I hope lady luck stays with us on that front.

Thanks again Stosh for all you do.

Happy Holidays to everyone!

[StillerInCT]

I think we will beat Baltimore without Bell. We'll just have to keep Heath in to block more or use more 2 TE sets. Might even be prudent to bring Johnson in as a pass blocker out of the back field (Worst case scenario). At the end of the day we'll still have Ben, AB, Bryant, Wheaton, and Heath. This will be a serious test for the hogs and they should be up to the task.

[Steelperch]

Dale Lolley @dlolleyor · 5m 5 minutes ago

Judging by what I saw - and it's only Monday - Lev Bell has little chance of playing for #Steelers against Ravens. He is young, though
0 replies 11 retweets 0 favorites
Dale Lolley @dlolleyor · 35m 35 minutes ago

Just saw Lev Bell at #Steelers facility. Can barely walk

[rooneytunes]

Damn it. I want this game so bad. I hope he comes back. If not then hopefully Harris is the second coming of Timmy Smith.

Blount would have been nice to still have but who is to say he wouldn't have made a bigger stink and messed up the chemistry?

[Legacy User]

Is James Harrison third on the RB depth chart?

[zeke5123]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Player A is better and plays a larger role compared to Player B. Therefore, losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B. The fact that losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B tells us only that Player B isn't as important as Player A. It doesn't say anything more about the merits of Player B.

Stop using bad logic to fit your agenda.

[Orangesteel]

Makes me so damn angry that the bungled took out arguably our best player last night. Carson Palmer shifted in his recliner last night after he saw the hit. Fuckers.

[Legacy User]

I think we will beat Baltimore without Bell. We'll just have to keep Heath in to block more or use more 2 TE sets. Might even be prudent to bring Johnson in as a pass blocker out of the back field (Worst case scenario). At the end of the day we'll still have Ben, AB, Bryant, Wheaton, and Heath. This will be a serious test for the hogs and they should be up to the task.

Prolly need a Harris-Perkins combo. A Redman Dwyer, Davenport Gary Russell redux.

[Stosh-67]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Player A is better and plays a larger role compared to Player B. Therefore, losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B. The fact that losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B tells us only that Player B isn't as important as Player A. It doesn't say anything more about the merits of Player B.

Stop using bad logic to fit your agenda.

If you been following.................notice player B was not Heath or Wheaton ( starters)...............since the actual agenda derives from one trying to minimize the affect and impact that one said player B had on the offense.

[Legacy User]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Player A is better and plays a larger role compared to Player B. Therefore, losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B. The fact that losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B tells us only that Player B isn't as important as Player A. It doesn't say anything more about the merits of Player B.

Stop using bad logic to fit your agenda.

If you been following.................notice player B was not Heath or Wheaton ( starters)...............since the actual agenda derives from one trying to minimize the affect and impact that one said player B had on the offense.

Bingo.

[StillerInCT]

I think we will beat Baltimore without Bell. We'll just have to keep Heath in to block more or use more 2 TE sets. Might even be prudent to bring Johnson in as a pass blocker out of the back field (Worst case scenario). At the end of the day we'll still have Ben, AB, Bryant, Wheaton, and Heath. This will be a serious test for the hogs and they should be up to the task.

Prolly need a Harris-Perkins combo. A Redman Dwyer, Davenport Gary Russell redux.

I agree and I think we can win with that. If we win Saturday there will be 5 MVPs....if you see where I'm going with that.

[Steelersfan]

Lets face it, we are gonna have to do this without Bell next week. It can be done!!! Doesn't matter who is in there (Archer, Harris, Perkins or Ray Rice - won't happen). Whoever the RB is, whoever the RB by committee is, the entire key, the one and only key is, HOLDING ON TO THE ROCK. A fumble at the wrong time and we are fucked.

There is a reason why the Steelers notoriously don't play inexperienced players. The Steelers HATE the inopportune timed mistakes. They do it right, always have. You guys pining for more time by "nobodies" earlier in the year have a point, BUT the Steelers don't do it for a reason. And they're right, for doing it their way.

Yes, we need a back with some carries now, but we might have lost another game if that back had carries earlier in the season, due to a mistake. And may not be in the playoffs, because of it.

Harris, Archer and/or Perkins HAS TO PROTECT THE ROCK. We have a RB fumble next week and we start our off-season. The Ravens hit, they hit and strip, they know the keys to the game. The RB replacements better know what will lose this game for us. They need to bring Mendenhall in this week, as a guest speaker.

NO FUMBLES !!! It's critical and will determine the outcome of this game.

[Legacy User]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Whats the point of this comment?

the point is, it's a TROLL

[zeke5123]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Player A is better and plays a larger role compared to Player B. Therefore, losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B. The fact that losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B tells us only that Player B isn't as important as Player A. It doesn't say anything more about the merits of Player B.

Stop using bad logic to fit your agenda.

If you been following.................notice player B was not Heath or Wheaton ( starters)...............since the actual agenda derives from one trying to minimize the affect and impact that one said player B had on the offense.

Yep.

[Legacy User]

I'm happy that it appears Bell's injury will not be a "long" recovery.

I hope Bell makes a miraculous recovery but I don't expect it.

I believe Harris will be able to replace Bell for 1 game.

This O-line will rally around Harris and I predict he rushes for 80+ yards!!!

[955876]

Do rosters expand for the post-season?

Can Perkins be added without dropping someone else?

[Jobu]

Do rosters expand for the post-season?

Can Perkins be added without dropping someone else?

No and no.

[Legacy User]

Let's be honest with ourselves for a minute. When Bell went down everyone thought the playoffs were over immediately. Nobody is confident going in with Archer and Harris

Nobody would feel that way to that extent if Martavis Bryant went down

Player A is better and plays a larger role compared to Player B. Therefore, losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B. The fact that losing Player A is more costly than losing Player B tells us only that Player B isn't as important as Player A. It doesn't say anything more about the merits of Player B.

Stop using bad logic to fit your agenda.

If you been following.................notice player B was not Heath or Wheaton ( starters)...............since the actual agenda derives from one trying to minimize the affect and impact that one said player B had on the offense.

Can you stop with the agenda shit please. You both think that if I'm not hypnotized by groupthink like each of you it's an agenda.

I've been debating with some that while Bryant had a big impact, he's not the soul reason the offense is good

Either keep up, or please, shut up

[Legacy User]

the point is, it's a TROLL

You sir, are biggest internet crybaby I've ever seen

[Legacy User]

Nobody has said Bryant is the sole reason. Just that his insertion into the lineup was a MAJOR reason the offense put it into high gear.

[Legacy User]

Nobody has said Bryant is the sole reason. Just that his insertion into the lineup was a MAJOR reason the offense put it into high gear.

Fair enough, about 12 other guys are major reasons too

Collinsworth said On broadcast that Tomlin told him Lance Moore was a key piece

So I guess they all are