Terrell Edmunds is expected to start Week 1.

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
DP39
Posts: 2437
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:57 pm

Terrell Edmunds is expected to start Week 1.

Post by DP39 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:04 pm

Steelers first-round S Terrell Edmunds is expected to start Week 1 against the Browns.

Morgan Burnett was slowed by a groin injury during training camp, but he was not listed on Wednesday's injury report. That suggests Edmunds has won the job outright, although both players should see snaps. Sean Davis should start at the other safety spot.

Source: Gerry Dulac on Twitter Sep 6 - 10:11 AM

:shock:



User avatar
StillerInCT
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:45 pm

Post by StillerInCT » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:11 pm

From what I saw from him, he looked pretty good in preseason. I like that we're getting with the times and aren't afraid to start rookies right off the bat.
"Work harder not smarter" - Mike Tomlin

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:32 pm

StillerInCT wrote: I like that we're getting with the times and aren't afraid to start rookies right off the bat.

This is 100% not true and people really need to stop saying it.

TJ Watt, Sean Davis, Javon Hargrave, Ryan Shazier, Jarvis Jones, Leveon Bell (injured for first 3 games), David DeCastro, Marcus Gilbert, and Maurkice Pouncey were all day 1 starters in their rookie campaigns.

Juju was the #1 KR and #3 WR right off the bat.
Artie Burns became a starter halfway thru his rookie season.
Bud Dupree started 5 games his rookie year.
Stephon Tuitt was starting at the end of his rookie year
Mike Wallace was the #3 WR right away.

Why this myth continues to come up I have no idea.

Steelknife
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 4:31 pm

Post by Steelknife » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:34 pm

I don't think #3 WR is considered starter.

But the examples you gave are all pretty recent. I don't think SCT meant we're just getting with it this year, but that it's a theme now, and he's glad.

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 3246
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:35 pm

Pabst wrote:
StillerInCT wrote: I like that we're getting with the times and aren't afraid to start rookies right off the bat.

This is 100% not true and people really need to stop saying it.

TJ Watt, Sean Davis, Javon Hargrave, Ryan Shazier, Jarvis Jones, Leveon Bell (injured for first 3 games), David DeCastro, Marcus Gilbert, and Maurkice Pouncey were all day 1 starters in their rookie campaigns.

Juju was the #1 KR and #3 WR right off the bat.
Artie Burns became a starter halfway thru his rookie season.
Bud Dupree started 5 games his rookie year.
Stephon Tuitt was starting at the end of his rookie year
Mike Wallace was the #3 WR right away.

Why this myth continues to come up I have no idea.


I'm pretty sure he meant that he's glad we've been doing it more in recent years, not just this year.

At least that's how I read it.

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:58 pm

SteelKnife wrote:But the examples you gave are all pretty recent. I don't think SCT meant we're just getting with it this year, but that it's a theme now, and he's glad.

Louis Lipps Service wrote:I'm pretty sure he meant that he's glad we've been doing it more in recent years, not just this year.

I went back to 2009, so i wouldn't really say that's recent. But even then, the myth still doesn't hold:

2006 - Santonio was the KR and #3 WR from day one. Moved to #2 later in the season.
2005 - Heath started from Day 1
2002 - Kendall Simmons was the day 1 starter. Randel El was the KR and PR, plus #3 WR, and Larry Foote was actually a starter by Week 2
2001 - Kendrell Bell started by week 1. Casey Hampton was starting by week 6
2000 - Plax was a week 1 starter

Really, the only years we didn't have a rooking starting or getting ample playing time right off the bat were 03, 04*, 07, 08, 09.

In 2003, Troy clearly wasn't ready, but he was starting in year 2.
2004 was the Ben draft. Unique situation.
In 2007 2 developmental players were taken with the first two picks, and no one expected them to start.
And in 08 and 09, there were established starters ahead of the first picks.

All that said, Super Bowl contenders typically don't play rookies early. Taking a quick look at the Pats depth charts - they have started exactly two rookies on opening day since 2014.

Scunge
Posts: 3257
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:53 pm

Post by Scunge » Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:32 pm

Pabst, I think most naturally think of the defense and the rookies having a hard time becoming starers under the Dick LeBeau reign. Yeah, it started to change at the end of LeBeau's run but that was only because his vets all were up in age, or injured and Rooney was leading the push to get the young players on the field faster.

You can't deny that Aaron Smith did not have a single start his rookie year, or that Troy Polamalu did not have a single start his rookie year.

Or that LaMar Woodley only had 68 snaps his rookie year and obviously did not start any games. Or that Keenan Lewis had to wait until his third season before he had one start. Cam Heyward had to wait until his 3rd season before he saw any starts. Brett Keisel had to wait until his 5th season before he started.

There was a time when there was a very real apprenticeship that LeBeau believed in and rookies had a hard time starting or finding playing time. There were exceptions of course and he was probably overruled on some players from up above. He had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern NFL in terms of getting rookies on the field faster. I guess some can deny that happening but I remember Rooney being interviewed and frustrated by it and I think ultimately that was one of the things that made it more palatable to Rooney to get rid of LeBeau.

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 7137
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:52 pm

Scunge wrote:You can't deny that Aaron Smith did not have a single start his rookie year, or that Troy Polamalu did not have a single start his rookie year.


Smith and Troy, while HOF caliber players, were not ready to go. Smith, for instance, was a project out of Northern Colorado and a 4th round pick.

Heyward was caught behind Aaron Smith and Brett Kiesel, who, by the way, was also a developmental, later round pick, himself.

Woodley was also caught behind some veteran starters, but made a significant playoff impact early, in limited snaps. Timmons, I believe, did start that year.

Not that I'm disagreeing about the perceived lengthy apprenticeship, but it's situational.

I always thought that the secondary, CB in particular, was where the pine-riding for younger guys was the worst.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:57 pm

Big Snack started in his 3rd game. KVO was the starter and moved to DE. That was one of the fastest on the Dline.

Remember that the Steelers played 2-gap and not many colleges did. Players needed coaching to understand what they had to do. Aaron Smith needed a year to put on 20-25 lbs and improve his strength.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:08 pm

Scunge wrote:You can't deny that Aaron Smith did not have a single start his rookie year, or that Troy Polamalu did not have a single start his rookie year.

Or that LaMar Woodley only had 68 snaps his rookie year and obviously did not start any games. Or that Keenan Lewis had to wait until his third season before he had one start. Cam Heyward had to wait until his 3rd season before he saw any starts. Brett Keisel had to wait until his 5th season before he started.

I'm sorry, is the argument here that a 4th round draft pick from a 1-AA school should be starting right away? Kevin Henry and Orpheus Roye were the starters at that point, so it's not like the position was a need.
Troy looked lost in his rookie season.
Woodley was transitioning to a new position and was a 2nd round pick. Also, the Steelers' had the leagues #1 overall defense that season. Why would they thrust Woodley into a starting role?

All 3 were starting year 2.

Cam Heyward was in a DE rotation with Aaron Smith, Brett Keisel, and Ziggy Hood (a #1 pick 2 years prior). Who should he have started over?

Brett Keisel was a 7th round developmental pick who blew out his shoulder in his second season. Oh, and he was stashed behind 2 all-pros who happened to anchor the league's #1 run defense. Why would Keisel be starting in that situation?

Keenan Lewis was a 3rd round pick, and (spoiler) he wasn't very good. Oh, and the Steelers defense was ranked #5, #2, and #1 in the NFL in those 3 years that he didn't start. So, again, why would he be thrust into the starting line up?

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:17 pm

Ice wrote:
Scunge wrote:You can't deny that Aaron Smith did not have a single start his rookie year, or that Troy Polamalu did not have a single start his rookie year.


Smith and Troy, while HOF caliber players, were not ready to go. Smith, for instance, was a project out of Northern Colorado and a 4th round pick.

Heyward was caught behind Aaron Smith and Brett Kiesel, who, by the way, was also a developmental, later round pick, himself.

Woodley was also caught behind some veteran starters, but made a significant playoff impact early, in limited snaps. Timmons, I believe, did start that year.

Not that I'm disagreeing about the perceived lengthy apprenticeship, but it's situational.

I always thought that the secondary, CB in particular, was where the pine-riding for younger guys was the worst.


Timmons was rotational behind Farrior and Foote. He didn't start until his 3rd season.

Regarding CB - that's more of a product of the Steelers not investing early picks in the position. Between 1999 and 2014, Colclough and McFadden were the only corners drafted in the top 2 rounds. Deshea Townsend, Ike Taylor, and Willie Gay were all mid-round/developmental picks that worked out.

User avatar
StillerInCT
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:45 pm

Post by StillerInCT » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:29 pm

SteelKnife wrote:I don't think #3 WR is considered starter.

But the examples you gave are all pretty recent. I don't think SCT meant we're just getting with it this year, but that it's a theme now, and he's glad.


This ^. I remember early on when Lebeau was DC we tended to err with the knows vs the unknowns. As the old guard moved out we've been more open to starting guys right away and I love that.
"Work harder not smarter" - Mike Tomlin

Scunge
Posts: 3257
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:53 pm

Post by Scunge » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:37 pm

Sorry we will have to agree to disagree on Woodley.

Woodley was a stud from day one. DAY ONE.

Had something like 68 or 66 defensive snaps and produced 4 sacks, then in the playoff loss to Jax added another 2 sacks for good measure.

6 sacks in such limited playing time and the guy in front of him, Clark Haggans had just 4 sacks and started all 17 games that season including the playoff game.

Kevin Henry was a bum, and he probably weighed less than Aaron Smith the rookie. Henry as I remember him went about 275 pounds, anyway, Smith's rookie year, Kevin had a stupendous 1 sack for the year and only 30 tackles. He was one of the worst DEs that I can remember, just a guy. Again we will have to agree to disagree.

Cam Heyward was drafted in 2011, that season Aaron Smith was 35 years old and played in only 4 games because he got hurt. One of the main reasons why they drafted Cam to begin with is because the Steelers knew Ziggy Hood was not the answer, that year Hood had an incredible 1.5 sacks!!! Again, I just don't believe that Hood was a better option than Cam.

Troy? The safeties keeping him off the field were Mike Logan and Brent 'Burnt' Alexander? Are you kidding me? And that duo was so great that they kept Chris Hope from starting too? You know the 3rd round pick who would go on to Tennessee and make a Pro Bowl? Hope didn't become a starter until his 3rd season.

I could buy the argument that a rookie has to sit on the bench and not play, as in the case of say a Cam Sutton because you have legitimate starters in Burns and Haden and a 3rd CB in Mike Hilton who just happens to be one the best slot CBs in the game.

But to sit here and tell me that Kevin Henry, Clark Haggans and Ziggy Hood, and that HOF duo of Mike Logan and Brent Alexander, were fending off talented rookies with their superlative play is just ludicrous.

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 7137
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:51 pm

Troy really did have some less than memorable rookie moments, Scunge. Other than that, I'm mostly in agreement.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

Scunge
Posts: 3257
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:53 pm

Post by Scunge » Thu Sep 06, 2018 6:11 pm

And Edmunds will have some less than memorable rookie moments. Jerry Rice had some rough times as a rookie too, but that is the only way you develop and grow, by actually being out on the field and playing. Bill Walsh knew this, he had this philosophy of putting rookies out there and playing them and living with their early mistakes because he knew that they could provide a real push, an advantage to the team at the end of the year and into the playoffs.

Sorry but Burnt Alexander was just terrible and this guy was keeping not just Troy from starting but Chris Hope too? Sorry but that just illustrates my problems with Dick LeBeau so perfectly. Burnt Alexander was a better option to start than both Troy Polamalu and Chris Hope? :roll:

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Thu Sep 06, 2018 6:17 pm

Scunge wrote:But to sit here and tell me that Kevin Henry, Clark Haggans and Ziggy Hood, and that HOF duo of Mike Logan and Brent Alexander, were fending off talented rookies with their superlative play is just ludicrous.

For starters, i really can't go back 15-20 years and pull preseason highlights to compare Kevin Henry and Aaron Smith during 1999's preseason. And I'm sorry, but i just want to confirm - are you saying that a 4th round rookie from Northern Colorado was ready to start day 1? What exactly are you basing that on? Further, doesn't the fact that you need to go back to a 4th round pick 20 years ago kinda wreck the "Steelers don't start rookies" argument?

Regarding Logan and Alexander - it's that Troy was not ready. He looked completely lost on the field early on. Why rush him out there and wreck his confidence?

With Woodley (again), the Steelers had the #1 defense in the NFL that season. Why thrust a rookie into the starting lineup when he isn't needed?

Ditto with Heyward - the Steelers had the #1 overall defense in 2011. Why rush him out there?

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 7137
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Thu Sep 06, 2018 6:19 pm

Scunge wrote:And Edmunds will have some less than memorable rookie moments. Jerry Rice had some rough times as a rookie too, but that is the only way you develop and grow, by actually being out on the field and playing. Bill Walsh knew this, he had this philosophy of putting rookies out there and playing them and living with their early mistakes because he knew that they could provide a real push, an advantage to the team at the end of the year and into the playoffs.

Sorry but Burnt Alexander was just terrible and this guy was keeping not just Troy from starting but Chris Hope too? Sorry but that just illustrates my problems with Dick LeBeau so perfectly. Burnt Alexander was a better option to start than both Troy Polamalu and Chris Hope? :roll:


I can get behind that. That was a VERY risk-averse coaching staff.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Thu Sep 06, 2018 6:40 pm

Scunge wrote:Bill Walsh knew this, he had this philosophy of putting rookies out there and playing them and living with their early mistakes because he knew that they could provide a real push, an advantage to the team at the end of the year and into the playoffs.

Please apply your same standards to Bill Walsh:
Joe Montana sat behind Steve DeBerg for his first season and a half.
Dwight Clark didn't start in his rookie season.
Guy McIntyre didn't start until his 5th season.
John Taylor didn't start until year #3

You can view all of his draft picks right here.

The 49ers absolutely sucked when Walsh got there. Of course they started alot of rookies early on. But the same things you seem to be knocking the Steelers FO for also apply to the 49ers in the 80s.

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:10 pm

Pabst wrote:Joe Montana sat behind Steve DeBerg for his first season and a half.


To be fair, Ben pretty much shattered the conventional wisdom that rookie QB's don't start.

Granted, I don't think the rules today really afford the luxury to sit a QB for 2-3 years. But the trend was already in place before the last CBA slotted everyone.

I don't know if it's because the college passing game got so much more advanced, or if "rookie QB's don't start" was just a belief that emerged and then went unchallenged until someone wrecked Tommy Maddox' arm.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3015
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:25 pm

Kodiak wrote:
Pabst wrote:Joe Montana sat behind Steve DeBerg for his first season and a half.


To be fair, Ben pretty much shattered the conventional wisdom that rookie QB's don't start.

Granted, I don't think the rules today really afford the luxury to sit a QB for 2-3 years. But the trend was already in place before the last CBA slotted everyone.

I don't know if it's because the college passing game got so much more advanced, or if "rookie QB's don't start" was just a belief that emerged and then went unchallenged until someone wrecked Tommy Maddox' arm.


For any of the rookie QBs, Roethlesburger set HOW you win with a rookie QB. Start with a really good TEAM. Add a franchise QB. The QB does not have to carry the team.

Look at Seattle and Philly. Hell, Denver with Manning was the same. Really good teams that finally get some decent QB play.

Starting a rookie QB, day 1 on a team with a lot of holes tends to make the QB gun shy.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2689
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:46 pm

I hope they're prepared to stop the run and get to the passer.

User avatar
RemoAZ
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:56 am

Post by RemoAZ » Thu Sep 06, 2018 10:57 pm

I think some of you are making this way more complicated than it is. When rookies weren't playing a lot, our defense was really good for a long time. Now it's really bad. They are playing out of necessity.
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked Griffith, “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri Sep 07, 2018 12:07 am

Scunge wrote:Pabst, I think most naturally think of the defense and the rookies having a hard time becoming starers under the Dick LeBeau reign. Yeah, it started to change at the end of LeBeau's run but that was only because his vets all were up in age, or injured and Rooney was leading the push to get the young players on the field faster.

You can't deny that Aaron Smith did not have a single start his rookie year, or that Troy Polamalu did not have a single start his rookie year.

Or that LaMar Woodley only had 68 snaps his rookie year and obviously did not start any games. Or that Keenan Lewis had to wait until his third season before he had one start. Cam Heyward had to wait until his 3rd season before he saw any starts. Brett Keisel had to wait until his 5th season before he started.

There was a time when there was a very real apprenticeship that LeBeau believed in and rookies had a hard time starting or finding playing time. There were exceptions of course and he was probably overruled on some players from up above. He had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the modern NFL in terms of getting rookies on the field faster. I guess some can deny that happening but I remember Rooney being interviewed and frustrated by it and I think ultimately that was one of the things that made it more palatable to Rooney to get rid of LeBeau.


You put great effort into your work. Much appreciated for the way you debate or just educate.

Scunge
Posts: 3257
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:53 pm

Post by Scunge » Fri Sep 07, 2018 2:37 am

Pabst wrote:
Scunge wrote:Bill Walsh knew this, he had this philosophy of putting rookies out there and playing them and living with their early mistakes because he knew that they could provide a real push, an advantage to the team at the end of the year and into the playoffs.

Please apply your same standards to Bill Walsh:
Joe Montana sat behind Steve DeBerg for his first season and a half.
Dwight Clark didn't start in his rookie season.
Guy McIntyre didn't start until his 5th season.
John Taylor didn't start until year #3

You can view all of his draft picks right here.

The 49ers absolutely sucked when Walsh got there. Of course they started alot of rookies early on. But the same things you seem to be knocking the Steelers FO for also apply to the 49ers in the 80s.


Pabst we are talking about Dick LeBeau and how the defensive prospects, the young draft picks mostly sat and had to serve the apprenticeship. What does brining offensive prospects into the conversation have anything to do with it?

But Bill Walsh? Okay,

Ronnie Lott, maybe you heard of him, he started 16 games as a rookie.
CB Eric Wright he started 16 games as a rookie.
In that 1986 draft, they got two rookie CBs in Tim McKyer and Don Griffin that started 16 and 15 games respectively, as rookies.
Underrated ILB Rikki Ellison started 15 games as a rookie.
OLB Lee Woodall, 2 time Pro Bowler, the Telvin Smith of his time, started 13 games as a rookie.
DT Dana Stubblefield started 13 games as a rookie.
S Merton Hanks, etc, etc, you can go on and on.

I can go to other teams and see that they draft high and stick those rookies out there and let them play, let them learn, let them develop. I see this over and over again, from team to team. Walsh just did not start rookies defensively before the Super Bowls, he was doing it AFTER he had won two Super Bowls.

In terms of the defense being so great when Aaron Smith, LaMar Woodley, Chris Hope, Troy Poalmalu were drafted and that is why they had to sit?? Really?

In 1999, our run defense was ranked 26th in the NFL. We were 12th in points allowed, giving up 20 points per game. That was a #1 ranked defense??

In 2003 we were ranked 15th in points allowed, middle of the pack. We were allowing QBs to complete almost 61% of their passes they had 20 TDs and only 14 INTs. Seems to me that we could have used oh, I don't know, two high draft picks like Chris Hope and Troy Polamalu to make a difference.

You only have a set number of years for rookies on their contracts and it seemed that LeBeau at times thought we were still playing in the days of free agency before 1993. But things changed and it became paramount to get players out there and to squeeze as much out of them as you can, for as long as you can. To draft a player and then watch him not contribute for 2 years must have drove both Colbert and Rooney nuts.

And yes, before somebody pipes up with, well LeBeau wasn't even coaching with the Steeler in some of these instances, yes, that is true but the Steelers still followed through with much of his principles and defense and the apprenticeship, the risk aversion, etc. He left, went to Cincy and then came back to us and it was like nothing had changed at all in that time. Even now we are still struggling to break free of his defense and his long shadow.

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:01 am

Ronnie Lott was the #8 overall pick. Aaron Smith was a fourth round pick from a non-Division I program. Why you are even making this comparison is beyond absurd.

Speaking of absurd:
Scunge wrote:Pabst we are talking about Dick LeBeau and how the defensive prospects, the young draft picks mostly sat and had to serve the apprenticeship. What does brining offensive prospects into the conversation have anything to do with it?

Scunge wrote:In terms of the defense being so great when Aaron Smith, LaMar Woodley, Chris Hope, Troy Poalmalu were drafted and that is why they had to sit?? Really?


Dick Lebeau was not the DC when Smith, Hope, and Troy were rookies. That....kinda kills your argument. So you're basically saying that Woodley should have started sooner....on the leagues #1 defense. OK :roll:

Also, Walsh was an offensive minded coach, and the 49ers were an offensive-driven team. That's why I brought up offensive players that weren't playing right away. The Steelers of the 00s were a defensive driven team, and you're bringing up defensive players. Do you see the similarities here?

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Fri Sep 07, 2018 3:29 am

Scunge wrote:And yes, before somebody pipes up with, well LeBeau wasn't even coaching with the Steeler in some of these instances, yes, that is true but the Steelers still followed through with much of his principles and defense and the apprenticeship, the risk aversion, etc. He left, went to Cincy and then came back to us and it was like nothing had changed at all in that time. Even now we are still struggling to break free of his defense and his long shadow.

He was the DC for 2 years (1995 and 96). The Steelers didn't take a defensive players in the first two rounds in either year, and they had a top 3 defense both seasons. The year after he left, Chad Scott started 13 games as a rookie under Jim Haslett.

The DC after Haslett was Tim Lewis. Two rookies started under him in 2001.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic