2021 Salary Cap could be cut 30M-80M

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
StillMadAtSlobber
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:33 pm
Location: Houston

2021 Salary Cap could be cut 30M-80M

Post by StillMadAtSlobber » Wed May 06, 2020 5:04 pm

So there are some articles coming out on some comments by Shifty Shefter.
NFL's 2021 salary cap could take major hit if games are played without fans
By Zac Wassink | Last updated 5/5/20
The COVID-19 pandemic hasn't yet directly affected the NFL. Free agents signed contracts beginning in March. The 2020 NFL Draft went on as scheduled but as a virtual experience to prevent a large gathering of people. On Thursday, the league will release a full 17-week schedule set to begin in September.

Things could drastically change for the NFL if fans are unable to attend league events this year.

On Monday, Albert Breer of MMQB wrote NFL clubs could lose up to $100 million apiece in local revenue if spectators are not allowed to attend games because of the virus outbreak. The next day, ESPN's Adam Schefter explained closed-door games could drastically alter the league's salary cap during an appearance on the "MySportsUpdate" podcast:


Something to monitor: The salary cap in 2021 could potentially take a massive hit due to COVID-19. "The various estimates I've gotten from executives to owners is that the cap could be down anywhere $30M to $80M in 2021" — @AdamSchefter

Full episode https://t.co/yWz44h3j8C pic.twitter.com/FPI0fq9Prn

— NFL Update (@MySportsUpdate) May 5, 2020
Back on March 15, the NFL announced the salary cap for 2020 increased from $188.2 million per club for 2019 to $198.2 million.

According to Spotrac, the Philadelphia Eagles, New Orleans Saints and Atlanta Falcons currently have the least amount of cap space with which to work for 2021, not accounting for any projected reductions. Situations will, of course, change over the next 12 months due to cuts, trades and retirements.
https://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles ... 2_31928882



Unless there is an automatic mechanism (which players would never agree on) to slash salaries say 35% across the board if needed, then teams will need to cut players to fit under the cap. I was hearing this discussed on the radio this morning. But like the players would agree to anything?

So if 2020 is $198.2 million. and 2021 becomes 118.2 million, what can you afford after your $30M - $40M QB?


Mike Tomlin: Bringing mediocrity to the 'Burgh for over a decade.

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3026
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Wed May 06, 2020 5:41 pm

Now it gets intersting
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

User avatar
tbsteel
Posts: 10260
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:19 pm

Post by tbsteel » Wed May 06, 2020 7:58 pm

Not a chance in helllllllll. :lol:
*reserves the right to roots for losses*

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2703
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Thu May 07, 2020 2:00 am

So, let me get this straight. They may lower the cap or will lower the cap?

All after increasing the regular season by lengthening it to 17 games, adding a 7th seed to the postseason, increasing the rosters and gameday actives while increasing the practice squad from 10 to 12 players.

Makes zero sense that this would even be considered an option after all these new increases. :?

User avatar
SteelPro
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Thu May 07, 2020 2:13 am

Steelafan77 wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 2:00 am
So, let me get this straight. They may lower the cap or will lower the cap?

All after increasing the regular season by lengthening it to 17 games, adding a 7th seed to the postseason, increasing the rosters and gameday actives while increasing the practice squad from 10 to 12 players.

Makes zero sense that this would even be considered an option after all these new increases. :?
The salary cap is calculated based off of revenues. The formula for the cap is agreed upon in the CBA. If revenues fall the calculation creates a lower cap number. If you take away billions of dollars from ticket sales, sponsorship, etc... the cap will automatically adjust downward.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2703
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Thu May 07, 2020 2:16 am

So then they jumped the gun making these game and player increases. Got it. Thanks

User avatar
SteelPro
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Thu May 07, 2020 3:12 am

Steelafan77 wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 2:16 am
So then they jumped the gun making these game and player increases. Got it. Thanks
Not sure what you mean jumped the gun. This is how it has always been since the cap existed. Revenues go up. The cap then follows. Well, now revenues are going fall. The cap will follow it down.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

User avatar
Drummer Boy
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:26 pm

Post by Drummer Boy » Thu May 07, 2020 3:34 am

SteelPro wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 3:12 am
Steelafan77 wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 2:16 am
So then they jumped the gun making these game and player increases. Got it. Thanks
Not sure what you mean jumped the gun. This is how it has always been since the cap existed. Revenues go up. The cap then follows. Well, now revenues are going fall. The cap will follow it down.
Thanks, SteelPro. That makes sense.

User avatar
Burghboy
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:55 pm

Post by Burghboy » Thu May 07, 2020 5:21 am

SteelPro wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 3:12 am
Steelafan77 wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 2:16 am
So then they jumped the gun making these game and player increases. Got it. Thanks
Not sure what you mean jumped the gun. This is how it has always been since the cap existed. Revenues go up. The cap then follows. Well, now revenues are going fall. The cap will follow it down.
Yeah it's pretty straightforward and nothing new. It's just that no one ever figured there would be a situation where an NFL could take place in empty stadiums. I'd think they'd have to figure out some sort of special one year exemption but that would require both sides realizing they need to take a hit... So probably not.

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3026
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Thu May 07, 2020 4:25 pm

CBA language :

“Cancelled Games. If one or more weeks of any NFL season are cancelled or AR for any League Year substantially decreases, in either case due to a terrorist or military action, natural disaster, or similar event, the parties shall engage in good faith negotiations to adjust the provisions of this Agreement with respect to the projection of AR and the Salary Cap for the following League Year so that AR for the following League Year is projected in a fair manner consistent with the changed revenue projection caused by such action.”

https://overthecap.com/what-could-happe ... p-in-2021/
How much will that be is a good question. The best that we can do to estimate anything is to look at the Packers financials which separate their revenue into National and Local income. Last year the Packers received National revenue of $274.3 million with $203.7 million coming from local income. The prior year the numbers were $255.9 and $199 million. Now the Packers may be understated a bit since they are considered a smaller market team and I don’t think these numbers would make it to the players share the last few years, but it would be close so lets say a fair estimate is that 45% of the league revenue is made up of local revenues and the rest comes from the revenue share from the big media packages.

Clearly this is going to be a big number. Based on the recent growth I think the Packers would likely have expected around $208 or $209 million in revenues. Lets just call it $210 and pretend that that goes for all teams. If you eliminate 70% of that figure about $78M of the losses would be attributed to the owners and $69M would be attributed to the players. Currently there is about an 80-20 split between salary cap and benefits for the player distribution which would mean we would be look at a decrease of around $55 million in cap space, assuming that the benefits are not sunk at a certain number, in which case the cap loss would be more. If you lost all local revenues you would probably be looking at an $80 million loss in cap space while a 40% loss would result in a $31 million drop in cap room.

None of this takes into account the loss of national revenues but even if that is a small number (and there will likely be some loss) my guess is that you are looking at the cap to drop anywhere from $40 million from projections to $85 million from projections for 2021. This would assume that 2021 growth remains steady pace from where 2020 was expected to be. We had projected a cap of about $215 million in 2021 based on players share increasing from 47 to 48% so anywhere from $130 million to $175 million. $130 million is where the NFL was in 2014 to give some context to it.

The higher number would result in about 14 teams projecting to be over the salary cap in 2021 and that doesn’t include rookies from this year since none are signed yet, so probably half the NFL. The big number would see all but four teams over the cap and really is not even workable.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

User avatar
El Kabong
Posts: 7561
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:18 pm

Post by El Kabong » Sat May 09, 2020 1:46 am

Steelafan77 wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 2:16 am
So then they jumped the gun making these game and player increases. Got it. Thanks
They failed to predict a pandemic, yes.
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
--Voltaire

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 7149
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Sat May 09, 2020 10:46 am

The TV networks are going to make an advertising KILLING once the league comes back; there are some ways to get some of that cash back if the NFL gets creative and aggressive. They are by leaps and bounds the most popular and powerful sports league in the country, they have their own TV network, streaming platform and DirecTV to distribute games themselves. They could simply strong arm another billion or so out of the networks to offset costs temporarily. You think they'd risk saying no? If CBS and Fox did, I'm sure NBC and ABC would be interested.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3026
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm

Burghboy wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 5:21 am

Yeah it's pretty straightforward and nothing new. It's just that no one ever figured there would be a situation where an NFL could take place in empty stadiums. I'd think they'd have to figure out some sort of special one year exemption but that would require both sides realizing they need to take a hit... So probably not.
If they negotiate, they can reach a deal. This will be all on the players and I think they would approve in a heartbeat. A lot of players stand to lose if the cap drops by $80M
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

User avatar
SteelPro
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Sat May 09, 2020 8:15 pm

Ice wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 10:46 am
The TV networks are going to make an advertising KILLING once the league comes back; there are some ways to get some of that cash back if the NFL gets creative and aggressive. They are by leaps and bounds the most popular and powerful sports league in the country, they have their own TV network, streaming platform and DirecTV to distribute games themselves. They could simply strong arm another billion or so out of the networks to offset costs temporarily. You think they'd risk saying no? If CBS and Fox did, I'm sure NBC and ABC would be interested.
Not likely. Companies are conserving cash and trimming their ad budgets due to uncertainty of the economic environment. The ads they are interested in running is more targeted than network TV can offer. As appealing as sports can be for network programming the ad dollars are still projected shrink when it comes to ad spend. That will be the case for quite a while.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Sat May 09, 2020 9:29 pm

SteelPro wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 8:15 pm
Ice wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 10:46 am
The TV networks are going to make an advertising KILLING once the league comes back; there are some ways to get some of that cash back if the NFL gets creative and aggressive. They are by leaps and bounds the most popular and powerful sports league in the country, they have their own TV network, streaming platform and DirecTV to distribute games themselves. They could simply strong arm another billion or so out of the networks to offset costs temporarily. You think they'd risk saying no? If CBS and Fox did, I'm sure NBC and ABC would be interested.
Not likely. Companies are conserving cash and trimming their ad budgets due to uncertainty of the economic environment. The ads they are interested in running is more targeted than network TV can offer. As appealing as sports can be for network programming the ad dollars are still projected shrink when it comes to ad spend. That will be the case for quite a while.
Only industries that don't require social interaction will be spending the money on adverts and brand marketing. Beer, cars, food delivery, insurance, the oil industry, hospitals, apple, google, microsoft, etc. might buy advert time at a reduced rate. Industries that require social interaction like hospitality, travel, local restaurants, and smaller companies will probably abstain. Just a guess.

I also won't count out feel good adverts by large corporations that attach themselves to the positive aspects of society. "We love healthcare professionals, humanity is wonderful, and so are we since we're here for you, and making donations to services for front line workers. Stay safe, we care." Just like Delta sending me emails telling me "we're in this together." But when my carry on doesn't fit into the minuscule cages, am squeezed into a seat for an astronaut that's 5'- 8," or get bumped from my flight, I'm in it alone.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Mon May 11, 2020 1:08 am

jebrick wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
If they negotiate, they can reach a deal. This will be all on the players and I think they would approve in a heartbeat. A lot of players stand to lose if the cap drops by $80M
I think it's more complicated than that. Players have leverage here - if the cap drops over $50M next year, the teams will be forced to cut big names and eat dead cap (an Antonio Brown/Lev Bell wet dream).

So I think the owners work out some sort of exemption to the cap, but I'm not sure they can without NFLPA approval. The cap decreasing won't affect guys currently under contract, and that's where the big logjam is going to occur.

I don't really see, for example, DAL going to Dak next year and saying "need you to give up 1/3 of that $35M salary". Now that I think about it, I wonder if that's why Dak hasn't signed that deal - which could turn out to be either brilliant or stupid.

No really sure. Lot of moving parts and considerations. But I think the players might have the owners by the short hairs. The question is if they can stand together - about half of the average team's cap is tied-up in 10-12 players. There might be a few mid-tier guys who could be at risk, but for the most part the guys making less than $1M (over half the team) don't have to agree to a 1/3 paycut. You have a CBA and they all have contracts, which also specifies league minimums - tell the multi-millionaires to work it out with the billionaires and leave me and my $435k alone.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

stillthere
Posts: 8537
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am

Post by stillthere » Mon May 11, 2020 1:23 am

Kodiak wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 1:08 am
I don't really see, for example, DAL going to Dak next year and saying "need you to give up 1/3 of that $35M salary". Now that I think about it, I wonder if that's why Dak hasn't signed that deal - which could turn out to be either brilliant or stupid.
I don't know how far apart they are in respect to a long term deal and money but not signing the franchise offer an leaving 30 million guaranteed is dumb in my opinion. At least get that cash and then you can work on a long term deal for the next few weeks but get that franchise money while it is there. Even if Dallas says fuck you and pulls the franchise offer he cannot get anywhere near that money on the open market since the teams already have most of their rosters set and salaries lined up for the upcoming season.

User avatar
RemoAZ
Posts: 3401
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:56 am

Post by RemoAZ » Mon May 11, 2020 3:30 am

They should add a game somewhere to increase TV revenue. Say a Friday night, Saturday night or hell, even add a 4th slot on Sunday. They could do something to get creative. The NFL is a cash machine. They just need an emergency revenue plan for one season. It can be done.
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked Griffith, “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Mon May 11, 2020 3:39 am

stillthere wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 1:23 am
I don't know how far apart they are in respect to a long term deal and money but not signing the franchise offer an leaving 30 million guaranteed is dumb in my opinion. At least get that cash and then you can work on a long term deal for the next few weeks but get that franchise money while it is there.
I didn't realize he hadn't signed the tender. But I wonder if he was advised not to - if there were no season and he didn't get paid, would there be a difference between having signed a tag or not? For example, what if the NFL rolled (tolled?) all the contracts and he was obligated to play under the tag next year, same as anyone else who would have been a FA after 2020. They tag him for 2021 - would that be the second tag, or still the first and is it different if he never signed the first tender?

I have no idea. I'm guessing agents are very busy trying to figure out all the scenarios and what the contracts say.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Mon May 11, 2020 3:43 am

RemoAZ wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:30 am
They should add a game somewhere to increase TV revenue.
The NFL is supposedly considering Saturday games if there is no college football. But sounds like not many games, nothing remotely like moving half of Sunday games to Saturday.

Seems like an easy way to make more money for everyone. Except with TNF, SNF (and double-header the first week or two), Sunday prime time plus the usual slate of early/late Sunday games....Already pretty saturated - I know I'm not going to watch 5-6 games a week.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

stillthere
Posts: 8537
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am

Post by stillthere » Mon May 11, 2020 4:21 am

Kodiak wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 3:39 am
stillthere wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 1:23 am
I don't know how far apart they are in respect to a long term deal and money but not signing the franchise offer an leaving 30 million guaranteed is dumb in my opinion. At least get that cash and then you can work on a long term deal for the next few weeks but get that franchise money while it is there.
I didn't realize he hadn't signed the tender. But I wonder if he was advised not to - if there were no season and he didn't get paid, would there be a difference between having signed a tag or not? For example, what if the NFL rolled (tolled?) all the contracts and he was obligated to play under the tag next year, same as anyone else who would have been a FA after 2020. They tag him for 2021 - would that be the second tag, or still the first and is it different if he never signed the first tender?

I have no idea. I'm guessing agents are very busy trying to figure out all the scenarios and what the contracts say.
No clue on the tolling or tag designation for a reduced or cancelled season or tolling contracts. I would sign the 30 million dollar franchise tag already and then tell the team what you expect and go from there.

User avatar
SteelPro
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Mon May 11, 2020 3:53 pm

Kodiak wrote:
Mon May 11, 2020 1:08 am
jebrick wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
If they negotiate, they can reach a deal. This will be all on the players and I think they would approve in a heartbeat. A lot of players stand to lose if the cap drops by $80M
I think it's more complicated than that. Players have leverage here - if the cap drops over $50M next year, the teams will be forced to cut big names and eat dead cap (an Antonio Brown/Lev Bell wet dream).

So I think the owners work out some sort of exemption to the cap, but I'm not sure they can without NFLPA approval. The cap decreasing won't affect guys currently under contract, and that's where the big logjam is going to occur.

I don't really see, for example, DAL going to Dak next year and saying "need you to give up 1/3 of that $35M salary". Now that I think about it, I wonder if that's why Dak hasn't signed that deal - which could turn out to be either brilliant or stupid.

No really sure. Lot of moving parts and considerations. But I think the players might have the owners by the short hairs. The question is if they can stand together - about half of the average team's cap is tied-up in 10-12 players. There might be a few mid-tier guys who could be at risk, but for the most part the guys making less than $1M (over half the team) don't have to agree to a 1/3 paycut. You have a CBA and they all have contracts, which also specifies league minimums - tell the multi-millionaires to work it out with the billionaires and leave me and my $435k alone.
Best option, and probably the fairest, is for players to agree to some percentage of their salary over the next two seasons to be deferred. Maybe 30% deferred, or something like that. Deferred money for 2020 and 2021 would be permanently excused from the cap. Would be a win win for all. Players still get their money eventually, owners get some easing on costs to deal with short term economic issues, and the cap doesn’t get perverted in a single year by a historic event that causes an unnatural revenue drop.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri May 15, 2020 3:00 am

I bet the nfl does monday thurs saturday sunday games.

Its very likely we get a much more severe nationwide lockdown during the nfl season.

Ratings and ad $$$ will be huge.

Every single team in the nfl could bend over and shit the total salary cap if they had to. They are all multi billionaires....except for maybe sad sack rooney and green bay.....

If you werent aware much of the nfl happens not as a true sporting event.....you will be this year
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3026
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Fri May 15, 2020 12:43 pm

But roughly 1/2of their revenue comes from butts in seats. No butts in seats, revenue drops and then the salary cap drops.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

StillMadAtSlobber
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:33 pm
Location: Houston

Post by StillMadAtSlobber » Fri May 15, 2020 12:55 pm

There are some signs that its gonna get rocky for the networks with ad revenue.
TV Ad Revenues To See Sharp 40% Decline in 2Q, Moderating Drops Through 2020by Wayne Friedman , March 26, 2020
Second-quarter TV advertising dollars for the April through June period could see a massive 40% decline in business, with lesser drops in the proceeding quarterly periods, according to one media analyst.

Bernstein Research estimates a “base case” scenario -- one where first-quarter 2020 will see a 10% decline in TV advertising, a 40% drop in the second quarter, a 15% pullback in the third quarter, and a 5% loss in the fourth quarter.

Todd Juenger, media analyst at Bernstein Research, says 2021 could see a 75% recovery of the TV advertising dollars lost in 2020. In a worse-case scenario, 2021 would only recover 20% of 2020’s decline in TV advertising dollars “given a prolonged recovery scenario as well as accelerated cord-cutting.”

“The underlying assumption is that advertisers will learn to live without TV and replace with more efficient/effective methods -- mostly digital. Much like what happened to print media in the last U.S. recession.”

advertisement

advertisement

Cord-cutting will accelerate in second and third quarters due to COVID-19 issues with consumers who are under pressure to cut costs. Juenger says this is will be “primarily driven from no sports” programming, which will lead to many cancellations at virtual pay TV distributors of networks.

The best-case scenario is that a 50% loss in business will be regained in the fourth quarter, when sports and the economy overall recover. The worst-case scenario is that the pay TV marketplace continues to decline with a 2021 recession causing cord-cutting to fall at annual rate of 9%.

“We have learned that COVID-19 is most dangerous to the population of people who are older and have preexisting underlying medical conditions. We believe that analogy also applies to media stocks.”

He adds: “Shareholders of stocks like Viacom, Discovery, and AMC Networks own underlying assets that rely almost entirely on an old business model with both severe adverse structural forces and cyclical risk, as well as the preexisting condition of overly extended balance sheets.”
https://www.mediapost.com/publications/ ... q-mod.html

[
From PepsiCo to GM, Big Advertisers Set to Cancel Commitments to TV Networks
Companies are seeking to take advantage of options that became available May 1 to cancel up to 50% of third-quarter spending
As movie theaters sit empty during the coronavirus pandemic, some films are being released direct to streaming services and digital platforms, shaking up a distribution model that's been in place for decades. WSJ explains.
By Suzanne Vranica
May 12, 2020 11:40 am ET
Big advertisers from General Motors Co. to PepsiCo Inc. to General Mills Inc. are seeking to walk back spending commitments they made to broadcast and cable networks, a dynamic that is testing the industry’s five-decade-old way of doing business.

TV ad spending fell in the initial weeks of the coronavirus pandemic, but was insulated from an even bigger drop. That is because the majority of the roughly $42 billion spent on national TV ads in the U.S. is bound by contractual commitments that are made well in advance of a new...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/from-pepsi ... 1589298017
Coronavirus could wipe out $10 billion in TV ad spending
March Madness signage
This year’s March Madness tournament was a bust. Signage as seen before the first round of the 2018 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament at PPG PAINTS Arena in Pittsburgh. (Rob Carr / Getty Images)
By MEG JAMESSTAFF WRITER
APRIL 20, 202012:04 PM
The shutdown of sports due to the coronavirus pandemic is propelling a historic decline in U.S. TV advertising: Sales could be down by as much as $10 billion in the first half of the year.

The projection, released Monday in a new report by digital research firm EMarketer, illustrates the financial pain facing U.S. broadcasters, particularly ESPN, CBS, Turner and NBC, which rely on live sports to boost their ratings and advertising hauls.

The New York firm said Monday that TV ad spending in the U.S. will decline by an estimated 22.3% to 29.3% — or $10 billion to $12 billion — during the first half of the year, compared with its previous projection for the period.

In the first half of 2019, broadcast and cable networks collected $33.9 billion in advertising spending, according to EMarketer. It now estimates that TV networks could collect $24 billion to $26.3 billion in the first six months of this year.

TV advertisers also are racing to adjust to their new reality. “TV networks will lose billions in ad revenues due to canceled or postponed March Madness, NBA, NHL and other major sports games,” the EMarketer report said.

The postponement of the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo wiped out more than $1.2 billion in advertising commitments to NBCUniversal.

Kantar Media, in a separate report, estimated that the cancellation of the NCAA basketball tournament and the professional NBA and NHL playoffs and finals could collectively obliterate as much as $2 billion in advertising spending. Research firm MoffettNathanson separately said that scuttling the NBA season because of COVID-19 could cost ESPN, ABC and TNT $700 million in advertising spending.

Walt Disney Co., which owns ESPN, has been devastated by the pandemic because of the nature of its portfolio mix. ESPN’s entire game schedule was erased, leaving the network to cobble together lineups devoid of its biggest draw. Meanwhile, movie theaters are closed, crimping the film studio’s profits. Disney’s vast theme parks, resorts and cruise lines also have been shut down since mid-March and the company is furloughing employees.

The pandemic also disrupted plans by Sinclair Broadcast Group to launch a new sports network with the Chicago Cubs. The Maryland TV station owner, which also owns the Tennis Channel, was hoping to benefit from its takeover last year of the Fox Regional Sports networks, including Fox Sports West and Prime Ticket in Los Angeles. But there are no NHL or Major League Baseball games to broadcast.

“With consumers stuck at home, many find themselves having more time on their hands and thus greater interest in watching TV,” EMarketer principal analyst Nicole Perrin said in a statement. “But that coincides with millions of newly unemployed or underemployed consumers who will have to keep an eye on their personal finances.”

The TV industry expects a return to more healthy levels in the second half of the year, thanks to hoped-for political ad spending. TV station owners initially thought political spending would be spread throughout much of 2020. But campaign spending also shut down in early March. Candidates for president stepped aside, all but assuring the Democratic nomination to former Vice President Joe Biden. “The election season itself and the apparent insensitivity of campaigning during the pandemic” has put political spending “largely on hold,” the report said.

EMarketer’s new estimates erase a rosy forecast the firm issued on March 6, which called for a 2% increase in ad spending for the full year. That prediction came nine days before the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended scrapping gatherings of 50 people or more.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-a ... -no-sports
Mike Tomlin: Bringing mediocrity to the 'Burgh for over a decade.

User avatar
SteelPro
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Fri May 15, 2020 4:36 pm

StillMadAtSlobber wrote:
Fri May 15, 2020 12:55 pm
There are some signs that its gonna get rocky for the networks with ad revenue.
Yep. The idea that these leagues can sustain simply on advertising is just not reality. Not during a recession. The good thing going for network advertising right now is this being an election year. The one card the NFL could play is a major streaming deal. That could make a dent in the revenue shortfalls.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Fri May 15, 2020 9:50 pm

SteelPro wrote:
Fri May 15, 2020 4:36 pm
Yep. The idea that these leagues can sustain simply on advertising is just not reality. Not during a recession. The good thing going for network advertising right now is this being an election year. The one card the NFL could play is a major streaming deal. That could make a dent in the revenue shortfalls.
But what kind of impact will 35M people out of work have Sunday Ticket sales?

By the fall, I think the pipeline of original content (tv and movies) is going to be pretty dry. That would, in theory, make NFL games the prime candidate for advertising dollars. Except to capitalize on that, they would have to get a lot more games on primetime.

I still think re-negotiating the CBA/cap next year is going to be a huge challenge. The average guy who plays 3 years in the league, along with guys like Ben in the final year of a deal, are NOT going to give up 1/3 of their salary without a fight. I think the solution will be to spread the $80M cap hit next year over the 10 years of the CBA. Maybe that works out to like 1% less in revenues to the players. Cap could be flat next year, and then resume it's $8-10M annual increases.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3026
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Sat May 16, 2020 12:24 am

The NFL must be still kicking them selves for not a'la carting the games on demand. Sticking with Dish Network can't work.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

stillthere
Posts: 8537
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am

Post by stillthere » Sat May 16, 2020 1:20 am

jebrick wrote:
Sat May 16, 2020 12:24 am
The NFL must be still kicking them selves for not a'la carting the games on demand. Sticking with Dish Network can't work.
Sell a game for 5 - 15 dollars would be great.

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2703
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Sat May 16, 2020 2:35 am

El Kabong wrote:
Sat May 09, 2020 1:46 am
Steelafan77 wrote:
Thu May 07, 2020 2:16 am
So then they jumped the gun making these game and player increases. Got it. Thanks
They failed to predict a pandemic, yes.
Yeah cause this wasn't something that just popped up last month... December this country knew about it. It was October that China began to unravel and not hide it anymore...Not Us?! It can Never happen to US!!! :roll:

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic