Supplement question for fitness posters

This is where old posts that do not fit into any of the new forum categories are dumped.
Steeldrama
Posts: 1877
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:44 pm

Supplement question for fitness posters

Post by Steeldrama » Tue May 28, 2019 5:33 pm

Can any of you recommend a product that will cut belly fat but not reduce muscle mass elsewhere? Any advice greatly appreciated


Nick Markakis on Astros: "Every guy over there needs a beating."

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue May 28, 2019 6:56 pm

Water and dietary fat or fasting. There is no magic pill. Creatine will store more water but that's not what you're looking for.

You will not lose skeletal muscle (DEXA scans confirm this), but your chest and thigh measurements will go down because some of that was fat. Guys with 46 inch chests tend to be shocked how much of that is fat when they get in shape for real.

Waist size or height to waist ratio is the key parameter. Pay no attention to BMI if you are muscular.

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 2992
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Wed May 29, 2019 12:28 pm

I'll echo what BYU says.

And I'll add that you can't really "target" specific areas for fat loss. Your body uses its fat stores in whatever order it feels like.

You can build muscle in areas to help them look better once the fat is gone, but you don't have control over where the fat is taken from.

In other words, doing a million situps will build your core muscles, but isn't going to force your body to burn any more fat in that area than it would anywhere else.


Eat a bunch of protein, drink a lot of water, build muscle in areas you want muscle, and bust your butt to lose weight in general.

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5644
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Wed May 29, 2019 5:16 pm

Louis Lipps Service wrote:I'll echo what BYU says.

And I'll add that you can't really "target" specific areas for fat loss. Your body uses its fat stores in whatever order it feels like.

You can build muscle in areas to help them look better once the fat is gone, but you don't have control over where the fat is taken from.

In other words, doing a million situps will build your core muscles, but isn't going to force your body to burn any more fat in that area than it would anywhere else.


Eat a bunch of protein, drink a lot of water, build muscle in areas you want muscle, and bust your butt to lose weight in general.


That's always the first complaint of women: when they lose weight, it's normally their boobs get hit first

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7902
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Wed May 29, 2019 9:57 pm

Louis Lipps Service wrote:I'll echo what BYU says.

And I'll add that you can't really "target" specific areas for fat loss. Your body uses its fat stores in whatever order it feels like.

You can build muscle in areas to help them look better once the fat is gone, but you don't have control over where the fat is taken from.

In other words, doing a million situps will build your core muscles, but isn't going to force your body to burn any more fat in that area than it would anywhere else.


Eat a bunch of protein, drink a lot of water, build muscle in areas you want muscle, and bust your butt to lose weight in general.

Sadly, this is true. Eat right, exercise and you'll look & feel better.

Any person/product that says it can target fat burning in specific areas is lying.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu May 30, 2019 1:03 am

Look at Hartings or Faneca...when they lost all that weight, their chests and biceps went down but a lot of that diameter was actually fat...I'm sure Faneca's DEXA measured fat probably went from 40 to 12 or something like that. But they are much more toned and defined. I'm guessing Faneca went from a 52 to a 42 jacket. WR biceps always look better than OG biceps.

The thing about situps is that they exercise primarily the psoas...which is an invisible muscle going from the back to the front of the femur and running under the abs. It's an important muscle but not a vanity muscle. Leg raises and yoga are actually better for that. There are good crunches and other things that isolate abs, but abs are really earned at the dinner table not the gym.

If you're worried about muscle mass, get a pre-workout DEXA and then repeat after. These scans are now cheap.

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5644
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Thu May 30, 2019 7:01 pm

Dan Smith--BYU wrote:
The thing about situps is that they exercise primarily the psoas...which is an invisible muscle going from the back to the front of the femur and running under the abs. It's an important muscle but not a vanity muscle. Leg raises and yoga are actually better for that. There are good crunches and other things that isolate abs, but abs are really earned at the dinner table not the gym.
.


Funny, my trainer always says "Abs are made in the kitchen"

Sadly I enjoy chocolate and all kinds of other shit that prevents me from accomplishing that

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri May 31, 2019 4:34 am

Chocolate is one of the healthiest things you can put in your body if it's over 85%.

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5644
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Fri May 31, 2019 12:13 pm

Dan Smith--BYU wrote:Chocolate is one of the healthiest things you can put in your body if it's over 85%.


Do you think I'm eating the high quality Cacao?
I am not

In fact I stopped at McD's last night for a hot fudge sundae after dinner- went completely out of my way to get my fix

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 2992
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Fri May 31, 2019 1:07 pm

Donnie Brasco wrote:Funny, my trainer always says "Abs are made in the kitchen"

Sadly I enjoy chocolate and all kinds of other shit that prevents me from accomplishing that



Haha. Exactly my problem, too. I actually work out a TON, but you'd never know it by looking at me. Waaaay too much greasy food and beer.

If I stopped working out and kept my current diet, I'd be over 300 pounds within a month.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri May 31, 2019 7:23 pm

Once you cut out sugar and grains for six months, and have sweet chocolate, it actually tastes so sweet it makes you sick. 85% is sweet enough. Coffee with no added sugar actually can taste sweet to me depending on the origin. It's amazing how much flavor receptors upregulate on the standard American diet when you flood them with sugar all the time.

Unless you are genetically exceptional, your diet has to be damn near perfect to get abs after 35.

Kodiak
Posts: 19242
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:02 am

Dan Smith--BYU wrote:Unless you are genetically exceptional, your diet has to be damn near perfect to get abs after 35.


I still say it's a function of diet and exercise. Most people over 30 simply don't have the time or discipline to get it done. I did it in my 20's a couple of times, because I only had to drop 10-15 pounds and I still had a lot of muscle.

15 years of laziness later, though, is another story. Definitely a delicate balance battling metabolism counteractions.....but most people fail only because most people don't have the patience/commitment for a proper program. Most either quit after not getting results quickly enough, or they burn out on the opposite extreme diving in with an unsustainable pace.

I'm both types. I need to recalibrate goals. Get back in the gym regularly. Walk/job regularly. Eat healthier. Do that first, and then start looking at modifications to get fit.

Nobody significantly overweight climbs Everest. But I do think we'd be surprised at some of the body types that manage the feat. The mirror is not a good gauge of fitness. To be lean, I think it takes diet and 10-12 hours of quality exercise a week. I didn't need the diet in my 20's, but I probably did hit 10-12 hours a week of cardio and lifting. It takes a good bit less to be fit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:07 am

...and of course....you have to give up alcohol...

If your middle age shoulders and elbows can handle it (mine are starting to revolt) in addition to jogging, I cannot praise doing chin ups and pull ups enough...your back, your abs, your chest, your forearms, your biceps, triceps, all of it gets worked.

I jog twice a week, do chin ups and pull ups twice a week, and try my best to hit the rowing machine everyday for at least half an hour.

Kids, mortgage, work...be kind to yourself...life is what it is...just make sure you’re not in less shape than your wife. :D

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Sat Jun 01, 2019 7:53 pm

I recently found a variation on the dumbbell chest press which is pretty cool.

Most of the time the move involves either a straight raise or a natural pronation at the top.

Instead, if you supinate at the top (think "sup" like you'd hold a bowl of soup, the right wrist rotates clockwise) then this engages your upper outer pec major in a way that bench presses with a barbell or conventional dumbbell presses don't. Combine with negative holding the supination as long as you can at least five times the duration of the up move on the inhale. For full effect work it to failure.

The pump afterwards is great and you can actually feel that the whole muscle is engaged.

Thinking of getting a trap (or "hex") squat bar, anyone have experience with that?

SteelPro
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Sat Jun 01, 2019 9:12 pm

I use a hex bar for deadlifts all the time. I feel I can hold form with it better. And with back issues I’ve had in the past (L4/L5 fusion), I don’t want to fuck around and have some poor form lifts screw shit up back there.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:58 pm

Hex seems to intuitively make so much sense it's becoming harder to come up with excuses not to do it. I've been doing pistols and other single leg work but there is clearly value to both. One thing about squats is you're obviously working out the shoulders, back and arms at the same time. Single leg spares the back but double leg strengthens is so there are tradeoffs if either knees or back are issues. Getting a full squat rack set up seems like a project and it's obviously worse for your back. I can see it if you're under 35 and free of issues.

Besides lifts, are you doing the farmer's walks and other exercises with the hex?

By the way, there are some amazing studies on the cognitive benefits of heavy leg work and Rhonda Patrick talks about this a lot.

As you get older, sarcopenia, or muscle wasting and decreased mobility is a threat and could cause something fatal like a hip fracture.

Strong legs solve so many problems.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:00 pm

On the other hand Andy Ruiz just demonstrated fitness is a complete waste of time!

SteelPro
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Sun Jun 02, 2019 11:38 pm

Dan Smith--BYU wrote:Hex seems to intuitively make so much sense it's becoming harder to come up with excuses not to do it. I've been doing pistols and other single leg work but there is clearly value to both. One thing about squats is you're obviously working out the shoulders, back and arms at the same time. Single leg spares the back but double leg strengthens is so there are tradeoffs if either knees or back are issues. Getting a full squat rack set up seems like a project and it's obviously worse for your back. I can see it if you're under 35 and free of issues.

Besides lifts, are you doing the farmer's walks and other exercises with the hex?

By the way, there are some amazing studies on the cognitive benefits of heavy leg work and Rhonda Patrick talks about this a lot.

As you get older, sarcopenia, or muscle wasting and decreased mobility is a threat and could cause something fatal like a hip fracture.

Strong legs solve so many problems.

I’ve really only used the hex for deadlifts. I occasionally do carries to mix up my routine, and when I do I use kettlebells. I really don’t do a lot of target exercise. I don’t have the time, and I’m 44 now and if work a body part too hard the recovery is too long that it impacts my other activities... mainly cycling. I do a 3x week total body routine that mostly looks like this. Pull ups, dumb bell presses, single arm clean and press, inverted rows, lat flys, bicep curls, either deadlift or goblet squat, box jumps, and finish with some push-ups. I only do two sets of each and I’m in and out of the gym in 40 minutes. It is a good maintenance workout. And I generally cycle 20-30 miles three times a week.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:03 am

I think the other winner for leg workout is the Bulgarian squat with dumbells. It gets in the glutes and hip the way pullups get into the shoulder. And all the ball and socket accessory muscles too.

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 2992
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:20 am

I’m a big proponent of sandbags.

My all time favorite movement is sandbag getups. I can promise you that if you can do 100 of those with an 80# SB, you’re well on your way to doing just about anything you want in fitness.

That said, the best workouts are the ones with a lot of variance and balance, and I’m a huge believer in that. Doing too much of the same movement trains the body to get really good at the one thing, and not much else.

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6089
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Fri Jun 07, 2019 6:06 pm

I never sit down at work, and consequently walk about 9-10 miles a day between that and walking the dog. It's worked so far, but I'm hitting 36 this summer, so I'm guessing my struggles are likely ahead of me.

Getting myself up on vacation to get several miles in before the sweltering sun hits is the fun part in the summers.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 2992
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Sat Jun 08, 2019 12:10 am

Ice wrote:I never sit down at work, and consequently walk about 9-10 miles a day between that and walking the dog. It's worked so far, but I'm hitting 36 this summer, so I'm guessing my struggles are likely ahead of me.

Getting myself up on vacation to get several miles in before the sweltering sun hits is the fun part in the summers.



I've been on vacation in Nag's Head this week. My wife and I have been up at 6:30 every morning to get some 3-6 mile runs in.

I am NOT a morning person, so it has been pretty awful for me. But I'm definitely glad I got them all in. Makes me feel slightly better about all the beer and bad foods I've eaten. Granted, those things don't come even remotely close to evening out, but I at least maintained my momentum with being active, instead of going home and being completely lethargic and not wanting to get back into my workouts.

I'm considering signing up for a 12 hour endurance event in August. Which isn't a lot of time to train, but I definitely need something to get my motivated to go hardcore again and get my diet right.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:06 am

I've come to believe as many claim that jogging is the red-haired stepchild of mobility, not conferring the all around benefits of sprinting, and not as safe as walking the same distance which basically gets you the same calorie burn without injury risk. I've also started to frown on endurance events as I know three people who have developed afib, and that's a widely reported problem in endurance athletes even in some cases with fatal results. The other problem is how much time do you have? A quick HIIT or quick hard lift with some yoga mixed in seems a better use of time. As you get older, sarcopenia or loss of muscle mass lead to a whole host of problems and endurance can actually exacerbate that. And who wants to negate muscle mass gains?

I really don't see the benefit of training for a marathon vs. a fast mile or even a quarter, which adds the benefit of strength minus the relative risk of injury. I think for a lot of people they like it because they can disengage and tune out, but I've come to prefer activities that require concentration and intensity.

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 2992
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:39 am

Dan Smith--BYU wrote:I've come to believe as many claim that jogging is the red-haired stepchild of mobility, not conferring the all around benefits of sprinting, and not as safe as walking the same distance which basically gets you the same calorie burn without injury risk. I've also started to frown on endurance events as I know three people who have developed afib, and that's a widely reported problem in endurance athletes even in some cases with fatal results. The other problem is how much time do you have? A quick HIIT or quick hard lift with some yoga mixed in seems a better use of time. As you get older, sarcopenia or loss of muscle mass lead to a whole host of problems and endurance can actually exacerbate that. And who wants to negate muscle mass gains?

I really don't see the benefit of training for a marathon vs. a fast mile or even a quarter, which adds the benefit of strength minus the relative risk of injury. I think for a lot of people they like it because they can disengage and tune out, but I've come to prefer activities that require concentration and intensity.



My endurance events don’t let you tune out at all. They’re team oriented with many varied evolutions within the event, including problem solving qualities.

Which is what I really love about them. You can’t just run a bunch of miles and think you can go into one of these events and thrive. A well rounded fitness routine is an absolute must. Running is actually pretty pointless when training for them. And preparation is as much mental as it is physical. We do much of our training overnight to simulate the mental fatigue aspect of it because being able to think when exhausted is vital.

R_S
Posts: 6526
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:17 pm

Don't eat from 7pm to 11am....or 8pm to 12pm. No toast, no eggs. Coffee is fine, no cream or sugar though. If you do that for a year you likely won't be a fatass anymore. It's the easiest no brain way to keep from turning into an obese slob like 80% of US citizenry. If you wanna really be in the top 5% of fitness in the United States of Gluttony try working out 3-4 days a week with the fasting.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:18 pm

"Don't eat from 7pm to 11am....or 8pm to 12pm. No toast, no eggs. Coffee is fine, no cream or sugar though. If you do that for a year you likely won't be a fatass anymore. It's the easiest no brain way to keep from turning into an obese slob like 80% of US citizenry. If you wanna really be in the top 5% of fitness in the United States of Gluttony try working out 3-4 days a week with the fasting."

I agree with this though I would tell most people don't eat after 9 pm and skip breakfast and lunch if you can. Terry Crews waits until 2 pm every day (though he sort of cheats with BCAAs). The point is to keep the feeding window under 8 hours or 6. You don't even have to do this every day. Then it's really not that big of a deal to do a 24 hour fast which is eating dinner only. And if you really want to go hard core, extended fasts, but be careful with minerals and have it medically supervised.

The other advantage to skipping lunch or avoiding carbs at lunch is no crashes in the afternoon.

Get before and after bloodwork from a good primary care doc including insulin and inflammatory markers and measurements (waist is more important than BMI), so if you backslide you can figure out what the problem is. If you're in an HMO you might have to seek out someone privately because they are not keen on this and simply give the same advice that doesn't work, like calories in calories out.

One other thing I've experimented with is eating more game and organ meat. There really is no food better than liver. And nothing more delicious than elk backstrap.

R_S
Posts: 6526
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Wed Jun 19, 2019 4:05 pm

The point is to make it easy for people to try it.

We've been so ingrained with the bullshit premise of breakfast being so important and even the more recent bullshit fad of eat 8-9 small meals a day because it will speed up your metabolism.

Telling them to wait until dinner to eat anything will likely lead to most people not even trying fasting. Saying don't eat until lunch is much less shock to the morbidly obese system.

SteelPro
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Wed Jun 19, 2019 5:35 pm

R S wrote:The point is to make it easy for people to try it.

We've been so ingrained with the bullshit premise of breakfast being so important and even the more recent bullshit fad of eat 8-9 small meals a day because it will speed up your metabolism.

Telling them to wait until dinner to eat anything will likely lead to most people not even trying fasting. Saying don't eat until lunch is much less shock to the morbidly obese system.


I dunno. I consider condensed eating windows a fad as much numerous small meals. Every person is a bit different. I'm up at 5:30 every morning. I need breakfast to function. Some people do well with many small meals. Some people struggle trying that, either because of life style or they just don't feel satiated with 300 calorie meals. Some people can do condensed windows of eating like you are suggesting. Others cant. Key is really to eat a balanced diet of nutritious foods, sensible portions, as little processed foods as possible, and limit refined sugars and alcohol. Whatever you need to do lifestyle-wise to make that happen can work. Whether that be many small meals, or limited eating windows, or a near religious tracking of food intake in a food app (what I do). Lots of tricks out there to help people accomplish the same thing.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

R_S
Posts: 6526
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Thu Jun 20, 2019 1:36 am

You only THINK you need breakfast to function.

Stlcrtn1974
Posts: 2257
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 2:19 pm

Post by Stlcrtn1974 » Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:20 am

Sorry to say, but most of this is genetics along with/or processed food. As I have crept in to my 40's, I have noticed I have to watch my carbs more and really limit alcohol, but that's my makeup. I still weigh pretty much the same as I did in my 20's. Some people burn calories faster then others, exercise helps with this. Laziness is probably one of the biggest culprits. Much easier to pick up 2 double cheeseburger then it is to make a veggie drink. I eat mostly all organic food, fruits and vegetables daily, and exercise 5 to 6 times a week (walking, light weights). People still cant believe my age, again genetics. If your lucky enough to not have to watch every calorie you eat, or fast, or Atkins, or Keto, or whatever the fuck, count yourself lucky and remember without your genetics, you would more.then likely be a fat fuck too.

Locked Previous topicNext topic