Pabst wrote:Hacksaw Jim Duggan wrote:Kuemper is actually a great comparable if using your criteria. He came off a season with a .932 save% as a backup and went to a team needing a goaltender. $1.85. He had experience and years of prior success as a backup.
Kuemper had a .932% in LA - he was traded to Arizona mid season where his save % plummeted to .899. Career-wise, DeSmith has much better numbers (albeit in fewer games).
And I was just spitballing with the other players & teams - who knows how it will play out.
I don't get your point.
DeSmith is a backup goaltender. So far, he's proven that he can play as a starter in a limited window. He has started 31 career games. Even if we expound that out and say DeSmith will end with say a .918 save percentage and maybe 45 games started for the Penguins, a very comparable contract would be either what Mrazek got coming off a bad year (1/1.5) or what Kuemper got after being traded (3/1.8). Oh, and I'm glad we have now established that Kuemper was not an RFA at the time of his contract. These players represent guys who have proven to be solid backups that can sometimes play above their level of play and start a string of games. To even say DeSmith is to their level at this point would be actually degrading the longevity of success those goaltenders have had.
I even went as far as to provide Kuemper as an example, as he had similar numbers pre-extension to what DeSmith has now, and he still only got 1.8. Kuemper signed his contract extension immediately after being traded to Arizona (when he had that high save%), so what he did after that really doesn't make a damn difference.
You then went to put DeSmith on the level of two coveted backup goaltenders at their times in Raanta and Grubauer. Not only that, they were/are goalies who are being paid as starters. Has Fleuryitis now turned into DeSmith Derangement now? The dude has started 31 games! We're already suggesting teams dump their Vezina goalies and look at DeSmith.
So, yes, a guy with his limited track record is likely to only demand 1.5 to 2 million as a backup at most. Might some dumb team go overboard? Sure, it's happened less than a handful of times with teams like Buffalo, Carolina, and Ottawa. The key is that it's happened less than a handful of times. It's more likely that DeSmith follows the contracts guys like Dell got from San Jose, Domingue got from Tampa Bay, or any countless other goalies throughout the last half decade to decade that have hovered around that mark. Or, hell, even teams like the Penguins did in the past with similar but a lot more established backups like Greiss and Johnson. Or maybe even guys like Ty Conklin, who was absolutely incredible for the Penguins the year Fleury got hurt. He signed with the Red Wings the following season to be a backup for 1 yr/1 million.
Would I offer DeSmith closer to 2.5, realizing Murray has been prone to injury? Maybe. Probably not. At that point I'd probably see what was going on with Jarry. It's a pretty volatile position, and I wouldn't want to pull a Philly or Chicago and pay a guy like Cam Ward 3+, even though he is a legitimate starter.
That is, unless we're all convinced DeSmith's .924 save % will continue for the rest of his career. That would put him #1 all-time or something. I don't know seems pretty sketchy.