Bell's suspension reduced from three games to two

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
DP39
Posts: 2434
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:57 pm

Bell's suspension reduced from three games to two

Post by DP39 » Tue Jul 28, 2015 6:59 pm

The NFL has reduced Le'Veon Bell's suspension for violating the league's substance-abuse policy from three games to two.

https://twitter.com/JarrettBell



rooneytunes
Posts: 3092
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:21 pm

Post by rooneytunes » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:04 pm

Sweet
Image

stillcajun
Posts: 5326
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:57 am

Post by stillcajun » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:33 pm

Awesome!

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:40 pm

Good news, give that knee a few extra weeks rest. Deangelo will be just fine for 2 weeks.

steelclan
Posts: 652
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 4:52 pm

Post by steelclan » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:41 pm

Nice! Bizarro world in NFL: Brady upheld and Bell reduced.

User avatar
BethlehemSteel
Posts: 1286
Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:39 pm
Location: IGZF'S

Post by BethlehemSteel » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:52 pm

Def nice.
"If our team doesn't face enough adversity early on in a season, I create it. Nothing builds a team like adversity." ~ Mike Tomlin
Image

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Tue Jul 28, 2015 7:55 pm

2 is better than 3, but should have been 1.

The upside is that's two less games for Tomlin to "run the wheels off"...assuming those 2 games don't cost us a playoff spot, it's probably a plus.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2203
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:16 am

Not over happy about this. More or less one of those bitter/sweet deals. Had Bell been smarter he wouldn't be suspended at all. On the other side of the coin I'll take the one game reduction. Woo Hoo!

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 7503
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:35 am

Kodiak wrote:2 is better than 3, but should have been 1.

The upside is that's two less games for Tomlin to "run the wheels off"...assuming those 2 games don't cost us a playoff spot, it's probably a plus.


Bell averaged 18 carries per game last year, and another 3-4 touches on passes.

That's hardly "running the wheels off".
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Steel Mike
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:34 pm

Post by Steel Mike » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:25 pm

Jeemie wrote:
Kodiak wrote:2 is better than 3, but should have been 1.

The upside is that's two less games for Tomlin to "run the wheels off"...assuming those 2 games don't cost us a playoff spot, it's probably a plus.


Bell averaged 18 carries per game last year, and another 3-4 touches on passes.

That's hardly "running the wheels off".


There's no room for logic here.
Twitter: @MikeDForThree

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 7503
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:33 pm

Steel Mike wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
Kodiak wrote:2 is better than 3, but should have been 1.

The upside is that's two less games for Tomlin to "run the wheels off"...assuming those 2 games don't cost us a playoff spot, it's probably a plus.


Bell averaged 18 carries per game last year, and another 3-4 touches on passes.

That's hardly "running the wheels off".


There's no room for logic here.


There's no doubt the Steelers should have tried to sign another RB after Blount left (Tate was not available immediately but was available a few weeks later) but in the games that followed there were limited opportunities to get Josh Harris actual playing time. A lot of those games were close, and so you weren't going to take Bell out just to get Harris experience.

Bell only had 25+ total touches 6 games last year. He averaged 18 carries a game and (I was wrong) 5 receptions a game...about 23 total touches.

That's what you want out of a guy as dynamic as he is.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Wed Jul 29, 2015 12:57 pm

Jeemie wrote:
Kodiak wrote:2 is better than 3, but should have been 1.

The upside is that's two less games for Tomlin to "run the wheels off"...assuming those 2 games don't cost us a playoff spot, it's probably a plus.


Bell averaged 18 carries per game last year, and another 3-4 touches on passes.

That's hardly "running the wheels off".


A number of backs have broken down over the years after a season with 370 touches...23 a game, RIGHT WHERE Bell was last year (and above that the last 6 games or so).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 7503
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:08 pm

Kodiak wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
Kodiak wrote:2 is better than 3, but should have been 1.

The upside is that's two less games for Tomlin to "run the wheels off"...assuming those 2 games don't cost us a playoff spot, it's probably a plus.


Bell averaged 18 carries per game last year, and another 3-4 touches on passes.

That's hardly "running the wheels off".


A number of backs have broken down over the years after a season with 370 touches...23 a game, RIGHT WHERE Bell was last year (and above that the last 6 games or so).


The only game where they might have inserted Harris in those last five after Blount was released was the first Cincinnati game...and even that was close until the 4th Quarter.

And lo and behold, when the Steelers got a big lead, Harris was inserted.

I have a feeling that DeAngelo Williams will not disappear once Bell's suspension is lifted.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

User avatar
Drummer Boy
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:26 pm

Post by Drummer Boy » Wed Jul 29, 2015 3:03 pm

Kodiak wrote:A number of backs have broken down over the years after a season with 370 touches...23 a game, RIGHT WHERE Bell was last year (and above that the last 6 games or so).


That's 370 carries, not touches. According to Football Outsiders, who originally popularized that number, the number of receptions has zero effect (or maybe even a positive effect) on yards-per-carry the following season.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri Aug 07, 2015 4:53 pm

Steel Drummer wrote:
Kodiak wrote:A number of backs have broken down over the years after a season with 370 touches...23 a game, RIGHT WHERE Bell was last year (and above that the last 6 games or so).


That's 370 carries, not touches. According to Football Outsiders, who originally popularized that number, the number of receptions has zero effect (or maybe even a positive effect) on yards-per-carry the following season.


Exactly...touches not carries. No one is running his wheels off like Earl Campbell.

Bell's games are far more like Roger Craig.....guys who are dangerous receivers. Craig played in a far more violent league (although much different offense) and still had a great career.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic