Ben to the 49ers!

[SteelerDayTrader]

Way too many Steeler fans suck dick and hug nuts. Lolololz

Watt will never again break 12 sacks. Honestly I doubt he gets past 10.

That’s ^^^^ a good guess

What isnt a guess is he has NEVER really impacted a big game that ignited or closed out a big win.

Never

Ever

And yet Steeler Nut Hug Nation is unrelenting…..

Lolololz

[El Kabong]

Way too many Steeler suck dick and hug nuts

Watt will never again break 12 sacks. Honestly I doubt he gets past 10.

That’s ^^^^ a good guess

What isnt a guess is he has NEVER really impacted a big game that ignited or closed out a big win.

Never

Ever

And yet Steeler Nut Hug Nation is unrelenting…..

Lolololz

How does it continue to escape you that Watt, himself, may have put forth sufficient effort to win a game (say by tipping a pass in a playoff game so that it can be intercepted by a teammate and by recovering a fumble and scoring a TD) but the TEAM lost because the rest of the TEAM sucks. This constant blaming Watt for not being able to overcome the suckitude of the rest of the team is ridiculous.

I've asked you this several times before, and you've ignored it every time because you know very well what the answer is and what it means to your argument:

Why didn't BEN win the playoff game against the Chiefs?

[SteelerDayTrader]

@El Kabong

You hug Chokeasaurus Watt nuts without fail. Lolololz

Does it EVER strike you that you can’t refute my statements on Chokeasaurus Watt even with JUST ONE clear example ??

Lolololz

The guy is a stat whore mainly against bad teams

When it comes time to make plays on a championship level he disappears

[Professor Half Wit]

I suspect a lot of this trolling would be undermined if STD would define what he means by an impact play.

Also, given the importance of the QB position ( there’s no question it’s by far the mist important) I would think impact play would and should be different for the respective positions.

[Mick]

I suspect a lot of this trolling would be undermined if STD would define what he means by an impact play.

Also, given the importance of the QB position ( there’s no question it’s by far the mist important) I would think impact play would and should be different for the respective positions.

an impact play is a key play that allows the steelers to progress farther than they have in the postseason than they’ve done in the past 6 seasons.

[Professor Half Wit]

I suspect a lot of this trolling would be undermined if STD would define what he means by an impact play.

Also, given the importance of the QB position ( there’s no question it’s by far the mist important) I would think impact play would and should be different for the respective positions.

an impact play is a key play that allows the steelers to progress farther than they have in the postseason than they’ve done in the past 6 seasons.

How’d you settle on that definition?

[JackLambert58]

No Pro Bowlers to be seen anywhere on this team.

Except for Coach of course.

Smartest guy in the room.

[Mick]

I suspect a lot of this trolling would be undermined if STD would define what he means by an impact play.

Also, given the importance of the QB position ( there’s no question it’s by far the mist important) I would think impact play would and should be different for the respective positions.

an impact play is a key play that allows the steelers to progress farther than they have in the postseason than they’ve done in the past 6 seasons.

How’d you settle on that definition?

i’ve read enough std posts to understand how self-relocating goalpost expectations work.

[Professor Half Wit]

an impact play is a key play that allows the steelers to progress farther than they have in the postseason than they’ve done in the past 6 seasons.

How’d you settle on that definition?

i’ve read enough std posts to understand how self-relocating goalpost expectations work.

I was going to say, if that’s the definition, then Ben did not make any impact plays the past 6 years and that cannot be right for STD.

And THAT is why I’m curious what his def of an impact play is.

[Orangesteel]

It’s true Watt has never taken over a playoff game. But it’s also true that a Steelers defense hasn’t taken over a playoff game in ages. It’s not a Watt problem. It’s a Tomlin doesn’t know what the hell he’s doing problem.

[El Kabong]

@El Kabong

You hug Chokeasaurus Watt nuts without fail. Lolololz

Does it EVER strike you that you can’t refute my statements on Chokeasaurus Watt even with JUST ONE clear example ??

Lolololz

The guy is a stat whore mainly against bad teams

When it comes time to make plays on a championship level he disappears

You're the one who's dodging.

Answer my question: why didn't Ben beat the Chiefs in the playof game?

Answer 95's question: specifically on what other teams would Watt not be a starter?

Watt's efforts in the playoff game against the Chiefs would be enough to win it if the rest of the defense were as good as he is.

[SteelerDayTrader]

Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !! Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !!

All Nut Hug Nation members report to aisle 5 !!!

[K_C_]

Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !! Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !!

All Nut Hug Nation members report to aisle 5 !!!

Why did Watt personally outscore Ben at the half of a playoff game, basement dweller?

[El Kabong]

Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !! Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !!

All Nut Hug Nation members report to aisle 5 !!!

Dodge alert!! Dodge alert!!! Still not answering questions put to you!!!

[Professor Half Wit]

Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !! Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !!

All Nut Hug Nation members report to aisle 5 !!!

Dodge alert!! Dodge alert!!! Still not answering questions put to you!!!

Are you surprised?

STD is the posting equivalent of a prominent American figure.

Instead of arguments, he uses catchy belittling nicknames (while bemoaning when others belittle him).

He thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room and brags about how great he is constantly.

Instead of answering challenges directly, he deflects and attacks the credibility of his inquisitor.

And when he’s attacked for being an asshole, he plays the victim.

It’s pretty uncanny, actually, how much he resembles that prominent American figure.

[langer]

Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !! Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !!

All Nut Hug Nation members report to aisle 5 !!!

Dodge alert!! Dodge alert!!! Still not answering questions put to you!!!

Are you surprised?

STD is the posting equivalent of a prominent American figure.

Instead of arguments, he uses catchy belittling nicknames (while bemoaning when others belittle him).

He thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room and brags about how great he is constantly.

Instead of answering challenges directly, he deflects and attacks the credibility of his inquisitor.

And when he’s attacked for being an asshole, he plays the victim.

It’s pretty uncanny, actually, how much he resembles that prominent American figure.

Are you talking about the guy who beat the shit out of Corn Pop, a Bad Dude? It certainly fits this list of inadequacies, being the top of his class at Harvard.

Sorry, forgot, no politics. This could also describe Coach Mike.
LOL

[Deebo]

Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !! Nut Hug Alert Aisle 5 !!

All Nut Hug Nation members report to aisle 5 !!!

Dodge alert!! Dodge alert!!! Still not answering questions put to you!!!

Are you surprised?

STD is the posting equivalent of a prominent American figure.

Instead of arguments, he uses catchy belittling nicknames (while bemoaning when others belittle him).

He thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room and brags about how great he is constantly.

Instead of answering challenges directly, he deflects and attacks the credibility of his inquisitor.

And when he’s attacked for being an asshole, he plays the victim.

It’s pretty uncanny, actually, how much he resembles that prominent American figure.

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

[bradshaw2ben]

Dodge alert!! Dodge alert!!! Still not answering questions put to you!!!

Are you surprised?

STD is the posting equivalent of a prominent American figure.

Instead of arguments, he uses catchy belittling nicknames (while bemoaning when others belittle him).

He thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room and brags about how great he is constantly.

Instead of answering challenges directly, he deflects and attacks the credibility of his inquisitor.

And when he’s attacked for being an asshole, he plays the victim.

It’s pretty uncanny, actually, how much he resembles that prominent American figure.

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

Ouch that is a low blow

[Kodiak.]

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

Ouch that is a low blow

I'm pretty sure if we assigned wins and losses to posts that STD would have more than a couple of losing seasons....

[SteelerDayTrader]

Dodge alert!! Dodge alert!!! Still not answering questions put to you!!!

Are you surprised?

STD is the posting equivalent of a prominent American figure.

Instead of arguments, he uses catchy belittling nicknames (while bemoaning when others belittle him).

He thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room and brags about how great he is constantly.

Instead of answering challenges directly, he deflects and attacks the credibility of his inquisitor.

And when he’s attacked for being an asshole, he plays the victim.

It’s pretty uncanny, actually, how much he resembles that prominent American figure.

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

You are a well known board dum dum. I can’t think of anything you’ve ever posted I thought was meritoriously driven

[SteelerDayTrader]

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

Ouch that is a low blow

I'm pretty sure if we assigned wins and losses to posts that STD would have more than a couple of losing seasons....

I think of myself as the Santonio Holmes of this board.


Big time plays at big time moments.

The Honcho of HIG

The King of Clutch

The High Watt Hammer

The Nietzsche of Knowledge

No need to thank me or worship me

I do it all out of love

I love me some me

[Professor Half Wit]

Ouch that is a low blow

I'm pretty sure if we assigned wins and losses to posts that STD would have more than a couple of losing seasons....

I think of myself as the Santonio Holmes of this board.


Big time plays at big time moments.

The Honcho of HIG

The King of Clutch

The High Watt Hammer

The Nietzsche of Knowledge

No need to thank me or worship me

I do it all out of love

I love me some me

Since Nietzsche embraces epistemic perspectivalism (not that you understand why) you're only right relative to yourself—and no one else—if you're the Nietzsche of Knowledge. Or do you quote the Twilight of the Idols to imply you "Post with a hammer"?

[SteelerDayTrader]

I'm pretty sure if we assigned wins and losses to posts that STD would have more than a couple of losing seasons....

I think of myself as the Santonio Holmes of this board.


Big time plays at big time moments.

The Honcho of HIG

The King of Clutch

The High Watt Hammer

The Nietzsche of Knowledge

No need to thank me or worship me

I do it all out of love

I love me some me

Since Nietzsche embraces epistemic perspectivalism (not that you understand why) you're only right relative to yourself—and no one else—if you're the Nietzsche of Knowledge. Or do you quote the Twilight of the Idols to imply you "Post with a hammer"?

You have a convoluted but common understanding of Nietzsche

[Deebo]

Are you surprised?

STD is the posting equivalent of a prominent American figure.

Instead of arguments, he uses catchy belittling nicknames (while bemoaning when others belittle him).

He thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room and brags about how great he is constantly.

Instead of answering challenges directly, he deflects and attacks the credibility of his inquisitor.

And when he’s attacked for being an asshole, he plays the victim.

It’s pretty uncanny, actually, how much he resembles that prominent American figure.

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

You are a well known board dum dum. I can’t think of anything you’ve ever posted I thought was meritoriously driven

Wow, you don't have to be so harsh! I mean if anyone else said such a thing about me, I'd blow it off. But coming from you, it really says something.
I'll quietly reflect on my actions. Maybe I'll quote my posts as that seems to be an indicator of posting that is "meritoriously driven"

I'll await your needed validation.

[Professor Half Wit]

I think of myself as the Santonio Holmes of this board.


Big time plays at big time moments.

The Honcho of HIG

The King of Clutch

The High Watt Hammer

The Nietzsche of Knowledge

No need to thank me or worship me

I do it all out of love

I love me some me

Since Nietzsche embraces epistemic perspectivalism (not that you understand why) you're only right relative to yourself—and no one else—if you're the Nietzsche of Knowledge. Or do you quote the Twilight of the Idols to imply you "Post with a hammer"?

You have a convoluted but common understanding of Nietzsche

Explain. Can’t wait. You stepped on the wrong rake this time, chump. Nietzsche denies substantial being which leads him to adopt moral and epistemic perspectivalism. Happy to cite the text.

First you can explain what substantial being is. We can take it from there.

[SteelerDayTrader]

I said this in the other forum: STD is the Mike Tomlin of this message board

You are a well known board dum dum. I can’t think of anything you’ve ever posted I thought was meritoriously driven

Wow, you don't have to be so harsh! I mean if anyone else said such a thing about me, I'd blow it off. But coming from you, it really says something.
I'll quietly reflect on my actions. Maybe I'll quote my posts as that seems to be an indicator of posting that is "meritoriously driven"

I'll await your needed validation.

No need to apologize. I take no pleasure in vanquishing the likes of you

However you may continue posting

Try to do better

[SteelerDayTrader]

Since Nietzsche embraces epistemic perspectivalism (not that you understand why) you're only right relative to yourself—and no one else—if you're the Nietzsche of Knowledge. Or do you quote the Twilight of the Idols to imply you "Post with a hammer"?

You have a convoluted but common understanding of Nietzsche

Explain. Can’t wait. You stepped on the wrong rake this time, chump. Nietzsche denies substantial being which leads him to adopt moral and epistemic perspectivalism. Happy to cite the text.

First you can explain what substantial being is. We can take it from there.

Well since you obviously need help……I will help you…..again

1 the first thing you need to understand about Nietzsche is he German and like all Germans that means one thing. He drinks a lot of beer and has a good deal of Fascism in his heart. This why he insists on the will to power as major tenant.


2 the second thing you need to understand about Nietzsche is that like many philosophers he tries too hard to connect dots with continuous lines in order to support his view as relevant. For Nietzsche this means standing in opposition to both the unknown and the unuseful.

Like many philosophers he has come up with some great statements in the short narrative but ultimately fails in the long narrative mainly because he attempts to go too far.

[Professor Half Wit]

You have a convoluted but common understanding of Nietzsche

Explain. Can’t wait. You stepped on the wrong rake this time, chump. Nietzsche denies substantial being which leads him to adopt moral and epistemic perspectivalism. Happy to cite the text.

First you can explain what substantial being is. We can take it from there.

Well since you obviously need help……I will help you…..again

1 the first thing you need to understand about Nietzsche is he German and like all Germans that means one thing. He drinks a lot of beer and has a good deal of Fascism in his heart. This why he insists on the will to power as major tenant.


2 the second thing you need to understand about Nietzsche is that like many philosophers he tries too hard to connect dots with continuous lines in order to support his view as relevant. For Nietzsche this means standing in opposition to both the unknown and the unuseful.

Like many philosophers he has come up with some great statements in the short narrative but ultimately fails in the long narrative mainly because he attempts to go too far.

This response reads like a shitty opening paragraph in a freshman paper from a student who did not read the text. In fact, it's a lot like a Mike Tomlin presser: a lot of words that say nothing.

You said my claim that Nietzsche is a moral and epistemic perspectivalist is convoluted. Your vapid response doesn't address this.

Here, let ME help you:

“just as the popular mind separates the lightening from the flash and takes the latter for an action, for the operation of a subject called lightening, so popular morality also separates strength from expression of strength, as if there were a neutral substratum behind the strong man, which was free to express strength or not to do so. But there is no such substratum; there is no 'being' behind doing, effecting, becoming; the 'doer' is merely a fiction added to the deed -- the deed is everything” (Genealogy of Morality I: 13)

You see here in the GM (he does this also in On Truth and Lying in the Extra Moral Sense from the Twilight of the Idols) he denies that there is substantial being. This is the basis for the moral perspectivalism he advocates.

We both know you're totally full of shit. Why not just admit it.

[SteelerDayTrader]

Explain. Can’t wait. You stepped on the wrong rake this time, chump. Nietzsche denies substantial being which leads him to adopt moral and epistemic perspectivalism. Happy to cite the text.

First you can explain what substantial being is. We can take it from there.

Well since you obviously need help……I will help you…..again

1 the first thing you need to understand about Nietzsche is he German and like all Germans that means one thing. He drinks a lot of beer and has a good deal of Fascism in his heart. This why he insists on the will to power as major tenant.


2 the second thing you need to understand about Nietzsche is that like many philosophers he tries too hard to connect dots with continuous lines in order to support his view as relevant. For Nietzsche this means standing in opposition to both the unknown and the unuseful.

Like many philosophers he has come up with some great statements in the short narrative but ultimately fails in the long narrative mainly because he attempts to go too far.

This response reads like a shitty opening paragraph in a freshman paper from a student who did not read the text. In fact, it's a lot like a Mike Tomlin presser: a lot of words that say nothing.

You said my claim that Nietzsche is a moral and epistemic perspectivalist is convoluted. Your vapid response doesn't address this.

Here, let ME help you:

“just as the popular mind separates the lightening from the flash and takes the latter for an action, for the operation of a subject called lightening, so popular morality also separates strength from expression of strength, as if there were a neutral substratum behind the strong man, which was free to express strength or not to do so. But there is no such substratum; there is no 'being' behind doing, effecting, becoming; the 'doer' is merely a fiction added to the deed -- the deed is everything” (Genealogy of Morality I: 13)

You see here in the GM (he does this also in On Truth and Lying in the Extra Moral Sense from the Twilight of the Idols) he denies that there is substantial being. This is the basis for the moral perspectivalism he advocates.

We both know you're totally full of shit. Why not just admit it.

You understand Nietzsche on the level of what you are told

I understand Nietzsche on a level of what exists

Very big difference

You’ll get there one day

Probably


Not everything fits within the confines of great texts

Thats why there are so many great texts

[Ice]

Ouch that is a low blow

I'm pretty sure if we assigned wins and losses to posts that STD would have more than a couple of losing seasons....

I think of myself as the Santonio Holmes of this board.


Big time plays at big time moments.

The Honcho of HIG

The King of Clutch

The High Watt Hammer

The Nietzsche of Knowledge

No need to thank me or worship me

I do it all out of love

I love me some me

Mark Madden, is that you?