KC wrote:
Jesse James won't be on the receiving end of any of these throws, I hope.
....at least not in a big situation.
Uh...why? James has made his fair share of clutch plays this season.
KC wrote:
Jesse James won't be on the receiving end of any of these throws, I hope.
....at least not in a big situation.
StillerInCT wrote:KC wrote:
Jesse James won't be on the receiving end of any of these throws, I hope.
....at least not in a big situation.
Uh...why? James has made his fair share of clutch plays this season.
fortythree wrote:the-other-burg wrote:If we play NE in the AFCCG, and Harrison steps on the field, he will have an impact. Even if he doesnt step on the field, he will have provided enough intel to the NE braintrust. They know how to use information to their advantage. A team in the hunt for the SB shouldn't let this happen.
What information can James give them that they don't already have the ability to learn through film study?
KC wrote:fortythree wrote:
You wished death on multiple people because the team cut Harrison.
Okay? I've done that hundreds of times in many different situations.
fortythree wrote:KC wrote:fortythree wrote:
You wished death on multiple people because the team cut Harrison.
Okay? I've done that hundreds of times in many different situations.
Imagine admitting this. Holy fuck.
KC wrote:StillerInCT wrote:KC wrote:
Jesse James won't be on the receiving end of any of these throws, I hope.
....at least not in a big situation.
Uh...why? James has made his fair share of clutch plays this season.
Because he fucked up his biggest opportunity maybe?
swissvale72 wrote:BarryFoster wrote:Not for his play making ability, but more for insight
They're weak in that spot though. Steelers brain trust should have forseen this; maybe they think it's a non-issue. Maybe Deebo was too much a malcontent. All we need to see....#92 putting heat on Ben in the AFCCG.
KC wrote:Imagine me not giving a fuck?
StillerInCT wrote:Based on a shitty rule. 3 years ago that's a game winner. I hardly blame that play on James being "un-clutch".
We don't beat Baltimore the 2nd time if it weren't for him.
fortythree wrote:KC wrote:Imagine me not giving a fuck?
But you give so much of a fuck about a game that you regularly wish death upon people.
Talk about arrested development.
KC wrote:fortythree wrote:Gonna be hilarious when James is either not signed or he is signed, and gets on the field and looks like shit.
Arthur Moats kinda shit or Jervis Jones kinda shitty?
Suwanee88 wrote:KC wrote:fortythree wrote:Gonna be hilarious when James is either not signed or he is signed, and gets on the field and looks like shit.
Arthur Moats kinda shit or Jervis Jones kinda shitty?
Nope....Bob Smizik stale coffee and tea bag shitty
KC wrote:StillerInCT wrote:Based on a shitty rule. 3 years ago that's a game winner. I hardly blame that play on James being "un-clutch".
We don't beat Baltimore the 2nd time if it weren't for him.
Don't like the rule but if we have to go to Gillette and we lose, that's on James.
I mean, people hate Toussaint for the Denver playoff loss (and rightfully so), James has to be at fault for the Pats loss.
Just gotta hope they upgrade that position in April.
VASteelerGuy wrote:Say what you want, he'll give away everything he can about the Steelers organization to remind them how stupid this decision was. Sorry, I don't see him as the last guy on the roster that could have been cut. We're going to regret this.
StillerInCT wrote:KC wrote:StillerInCT wrote:Based on a shitty rule. 3 years ago that's a game winner. I hardly blame that play on James being "un-clutch".
We don't beat Baltimore the 2nd time if it weren't for him.
Don't like the rule but if we have to go to Gillette and we lose, that's on James.
I mean, people hate Toussaint for the Denver playoff loss (and rightfully so), James has to be at fault for the Pats loss.
Just gotta hope they upgrade that position in April.
Toussaint fumbling in the playoffs is completely different than a call that was overturned on very little evidence.
I'd be happy with an upgrade there, but James has had a damn fine season.
fortythree wrote:
You realize the home team hands out the sacks right? Ray Lewis used to get credit for tons of phantom tackles. Hayward not being given half a sack means nothing.
955876 wrote:VASteelerGuy wrote:Say what you want, he'll give away everything he can about the Steelers organization to remind them how stupid this decision was. Sorry, I don't see him as the last guy on the roster that could have been cut. We're going to regret this.
According to Tomlin article on the matter Harrison was least important player on roster. Everyone else more important. I’d be fine with the decision if I also agreed with our coach. But I don’t.
McCullers plays even less and isn’t expected back. He also doesn’t play teams and likely won’t even be back next season.
Harrison was nice insurance. McCullers is nothing more than a wasted spot. Especially if you consider he wasn’t even first or second man up in event of an injury along the dline.
Harrison was.
Tomlin shown before he isn’t very good at contingency planning.
His experience alone was worth hanging onto him as the games gets bigger. We do have two talented but inconsistent first rounders at his position. If I’m a coach I want a guy like Harrison around to be in their ears. One tip could make a difference. Hey T.J., the tackle has been doing this all game. Try this...
Not getting that from Big Dan.
KC wrote:
Nah, the ball was on the ground. There's plenty of photographic evidence out there if you look.
I feel for James, just like I felt for Toussaint. Frankly, James' fuck up was worse than Toussaint's because Toussaint was a 4th string player forced into action.
James was a trusted vet who plays a ton.
Decent player who made a massive mistake. That can't be denied.
Suwanee88 wrote:Brain trust? Hahahahahahaha
KC wrote:fortythree wrote:KC wrote:Imagine me not giving a fuck?
But you give so much of a fuck about a game that you regularly wish death upon people.
Talk about arrested development.
Gets under your skin, huh?
StillerInCT wrote:KC wrote:
Nah, the ball was on the ground. There's plenty of photographic evidence out there if you look.
I feel for James, just like I felt for Toussaint. Frankly, James' fuck up was worse than Toussaint's because Toussaint was a 4th string player forced into action.
James was a trusted vet who plays a ton.
Decent player who made a massive mistake. That can't be denied.
I guess I just don't see the massive mistake. Unless you consider him reaching for the TD the mistake because that's ultimately why it was "incomplete". But to put it in context again, 3 years ago and we're talking about how great of a play that was.
fortythree wrote:Not at all. I find you to be very clownish and someone who isn't to be taken seriously. Just recently took you off ignore. I won't be making that mistake again.
KC wrote:fortythree wrote:Not at all. I find you to be very clownish and someone who isn't to be taken seriously. Just recently took you off ignore. I won't be making that mistake again.
You're not going to believe how much sleep I'm going to lose over some coffee boy turd like you putting me on ignore.
Fuck you and yours, sweetie.
fortythree wrote:KC wrote:fortythree wrote:Not at all. I find you to be very clownish and someone who isn't to be taken seriously. Just recently took you off ignore. I won't be making that mistake again.
You're not going to believe how much sleep I'm going to lose over some coffee boy turd like you putting me on ignore.
Fuck you and yours, sweetie.triggered
Amazingly predictable coffee reference too. Aren't you like twice my age too?
Anyhoo, back on topic.
Harrison couldn't see the field to act like he's suddenly going to make some huge difference is much more akin to bedwetting than it is to being a smart, informed fan.
BarryFoster wrote:KC vs IC getting a run for its money with KC vs 43
KC wrote:Guess I'm not on the "triggered" crying Company Man/Coffee Boy's ignore list yet.
fortythree wrote:KC wrote:Guess I'm not on the "triggered" crying Company Man/Coffee Boy's ignore list yet.
Not yet. Waiting until I get home. You're welcome!
KC wrote:BarryFoster wrote:KC vs IC getting a run for its money with KC vs 43
IC wasn't an absolute moron.
43 is.
IC was a pretender to be sure and he wasn't nearly as smart as he believed, but 43 is......a coffee boy for a reason.