BR without AB is an unknown entity.
Two Super Bowl rings says differently.
swissvale72 wrote:Still Lit wrote:Here’s some nuance, Swiss: you keep equating having more talent as meaning the team will be better and less talent as meaning it will be worse. Are you sure that the one follows the other, that “having more/less talent” = “team being better/worse”? Bc what some are claiming is that AB is elite in talent and an elite asshole so that his sticking around as he now is would do more harm than good. You may suppose that ABs talent is so great that no amount of disruptiveness on his part can overtake the benefits of his talents, but the idea that his assholeishness has outstripped the benefits of his talent is not unreasonable. You will say your take is reasonable. It is but most find the other position more so. We’ll see!
Yes Professor....I have made the determination, in my sovereign capacity to do so, that the objective benefit of this guy's talent outweighs the subjective and somewhat rumored disruptive effects of his "assholeishness. "
And Lit, I'm frankly a bit surprised that such a learned man as you resorts to the italicized word above.
KC wrote:swissvale72 wrote:Still Lit wrote:Here’s some nuance, Swiss: you keep equating having more talent as meaning the team will be better and less talent as meaning it will be worse. Are you sure that the one follows the other, that “having more/less talent” = “team being better/worse”? Bc what some are claiming is that AB is elite in talent and an elite asshole so that his sticking around as he now is would do more harm than good. You may suppose that ABs talent is so great that no amount of disruptiveness on his part can overtake the benefits of his talents, but the idea that his assholeishness has outstripped the benefits of his talent is not unreasonable. You will say your take is reasonable. It is but most find the other position more so. We’ll see!
Yes Professor....I have made the determination, in my sovereign capacity to do so, that the objective benefit of this guy's talent outweighs the subjective and somewhat rumored disruptive effects of his "assholeishness. "
And Lit, I'm frankly a bit surprised that such a learned man as you resorts to the italicized word above.
I love ya, Swiss but.......it's like you don't understand exactly what this piece of shit did.
He forced his way off the team. It was a coordinated effort requiring a bullshit story of a problem with Roethlisberger.
He did it to get a new contract because the piece of shit (rightfully) understood he wasn't going to get anymore money from the Steelers.
It doesn't matter if his talent outweighed him being a piece of shit.
THE GUY WANTED A NEW CONTRACT AND KNEW HE WOULD HAVE TO LEAVE TO GET ONE.
So he orchestrated his way off the Steelers.
Not Ben's fault. AT ALL.
It wasn't anybody's fault except the piece of shit and his agent.
DESTROYED a legacy in Pittsburgh it took him nearly a decade to build.
He thinks the cash is worth it.
You and I both know it isn't.
Jobus Rum wrote:BR without AB is an unknown entity.
Two Super Bowl rings says differently.
Jobus Rum wrote:BR without AB is an unknown entity.
Two Super Bowl rings says differently.
Still Lit wrote:swissvale72 wrote:Still Lit wrote:Here’s some nuance, Swiss: you keep equating having more talent as meaning the team will be better and less talent as meaning it will be worse. Are you sure that the one follows the other, that “having more/less talent” = “team being better/worse”? Bc what some are claiming is that AB is elite in talent and an elite asshole so that his sticking around as he now is would do more harm than good. You may suppose that ABs talent is so great that no amount of disruptiveness on his part can overtake the benefits of his talents, but the idea that his assholeishness has outstripped the benefits of his talent is not unreasonable. You will say your take is reasonable. It is but most find the other position more so. We’ll see!
Yes Professor....I have made the determination, in my sovereign capacity to do so, that the objective benefit of this guy's talent outweighs the subjective and somewhat rumored disruptive effects of his "assholeishness. "
And Lit, I'm frankly a bit surprised that such a learned man as you resorts to the italicized word above.
Vulgarity and ugly neologisms are not incommensurate with having read a lot of old books.
AB quit on the team. That’s not a rumor. AB forced his way out of town. That’s not a rumor. You suppose playing hardball and keeping him would have been the way to go. I understand that.
You also think had hardball been played AB would get in line enough such that his talents would supersede actions that would follow from that unhappiness. That’s about all I feel like typing on an iPad.
Jobus Rum wrote:BR without AB is an unknown entity.
Two Super Bowl rings says differently.
COR-TEN wrote:I'm gonna play devils advocate here for a sec and side with swiss.
AB- BR telepathy is a known entity. We've seen it for years. Lots of catches, lots of splash plays, etc. AB is a talented guy. We all know what he brings.
BR without AB is an unknown entity. This team and it's offense has yet to be defined. Therefore, he (swiss) can't make the leap and say it's going to be better, until he sees it. A doubting thomas, so to speak, if you will, obviously. I personally have faith it will be better, more rounded, and will make defending them harder since BR won't constantly eyefucking AB and force the ball. Belichick knew if you shut AB down. . .
Last one 10 years ago.
swissvale72 wrote:Jobus Rum wrote:BR without AB is an unknown entity.
Two Super Bowl rings says differently.
Last one 10 years ago.
955876 wrote:Last one 10 years ago.
AB on team 9 of those 10 years.
swissvale72 wrote:955876 wrote:Last one 10 years ago.
AB on team 9 of those 10 years.
So it's somehow AB's fault that Steelers didn't win a SB?
955876 wrote:But it’s not irrelevant that AB quit on the entire organization & fans with a playoff game on the line.
I get your point about the talent level on the field taking a hit.
However, what in the world can be done about it when you have an immature diva acting out like a spoiled 6 year old?
Give him more money?
Tell him he can skip all of training camp?
Tell him he Only needs to show up on game day?
Guarantee he will see X number of targets per game?
You don’t solve the problem of a spoiled little bitch by spoiling that bitch even more.
My biggest issue with the way it played out was how dummy Deuce announced to the league that he was implementing his own deadline. Essentially guaranteeing he gets lowballed.
Kodiak wrote:Moss, TO, OchoCinco.....and now AB.
Never won a ring. If you can't admit the success Ben has had with a revolving door at WR, "next man up".....then at least acknowledge NE has proven you can plug-n-play pretty much every position except QB.
My major point, as I've said repeatedly, is that I'm not buying this fantasy that Steelers can lose this guy, get shit in return, coached by the same idiot, and somehow come out better.
treat88 wrote:He not only forced his way off the team, he intentionally minimized his trade value in the process. The whole process could have played out behind the scenes and been handled quietly between Brown and the Steelers with the exact same end result of him in another uniform. His need to be a public assclown dumped any hope the Steelers had of getting commensurate value for him in a deal.
They gave him what he wanted and he gave them the finger on the way out the door.
swissvale72 wrote:Still Lit wrote:AB quit on the team. That’s not a rumor. AB forced his way out of town. That’s not a rumor. You suppose playing hardball and keeping him would have been the way to go. I understand that.
You also think had hardball been played AB would get in line enough such that his talents would supersede actions that would follow from that unhappiness. That’s about all I feel like typing on an iPad.
I have no idea about the hardball deal, Lit. Been saying throughout that my primary contention is this wishful thinking, bordering on delusional, that somehow Steelers are now a better team minus Antonio Brown.
955876 wrote:How would you feel about AB had we ended up losing that game against Cincy while the Ravens lost to Cleveland?
Lose a very winnable game all because AB was off pouting like a spoiled little c*nt over personal BS.
Still in his corner then?
AB, and Bell to a larger degree (IMO) became crutches and allowed the offensive staff to become lazy.
For example, they had to actually get creative when Conner went down and Samuels was forced to make that start against NE.
They got lazy far too often when they could pencil in X number of carries for bell and X number of targets for AB.
Losing their talent forces our below the line coaching staff to come up with an actual plan rather than tie rinse repeat BS of handing it to Bell and forcing it to AB.
Still Lit wrote:swissvale72 wrote:Still Lit wrote:AB quit on the team. That’s not a rumor. AB forced his way out of town. That’s not a rumor. You suppose playing hardball and keeping him would have been the way to go. I understand that.
You also think had hardball been played AB would get in line enough such that his talents would supersede actions that would follow from that unhappiness. That’s about all I feel like typing on an iPad.
I have no idea about the hardball deal, Lit. Been saying throughout that my primary contention is this wishful thinking, bordering on delusional, that somehow Steelers are now a better team minus Antonio Brown.
The response as phrased is possibly misleading for two reasons.
First, it is misleading bc as phrased it perhaps pretends that ABs behavior has nothing to do with whether the team is better with or without him. What you should be posting for the sake of clarity is that you think the team would be better were AB still on the team AND acting as he was prior to getting traded bc that is the current incarnation of AB.
Second, it is perhaps misleading bc it suggests that people are simply saying the team will be better minus ABs talent. In fact, what people are arguing is that AB became a cancer to such an extent that he would make the team worse despite his talent had he been kept.
Would the team be better with AB on it acting like he did? All world talent skipping out on practice and bailing on his team and so forth? What good does the talent do when you decide to blow off the team?
You keep saying the product without AB will be inferior to a product that results from ABs services. Well, which AB? The one that exists now or the one that wasn’t acting like a douche bag? Because if he were still on the team, we’d have the douche bag.
Still Lit wrote:Well his douchebaggery included him blowing off the team and having other players threaten to tear his pads off if he tried to play. Hard to make the team better if your actions prevent you from getting on the field.
So, my point is that your position is reasonable, but the other side’s position is hardly “delusional.”
955876 wrote:How would you feel about AB had we ended up losing that game against Cincy while the Ravens lost to Cleveland?
Lose a very winnable game all because AB was off pouting like a spoiled little c*nt over personal BS.
Still in his corner then?
AB, and Bell to a larger degree (IMO) became crutches and allowed the offensive staff to become lazy.
For example, they had to actually get creative when Conner went down and Samuels was forced to make that start against NE.
They got lazy far too often when they could pencil in X number of carries for bell and X number of targets for AB. I’m
Losing their talent forces our below the line coaching staff to come up with an actual plan rather than tie rinse repeat BS of handing it to Bell and forcing it to AB.
swissvale72 wrote:Did he become a douchebag all of a sudden?