James Conner
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
Re: James Conner
i think there's a fair point to be made about Conner's lack of vision, general lack of NFL polish as compared to Bell, etc.; the stuff the podcast crew has been (correctly) harping on for weeks
he strikes me as a guy who if granted the starting role is always going to impress one week and get completely stonewalled the next, at least as a rusher (though he's shown he can still contribute as a pass-catcher even in those games)
if you're looking for a consistent 4 ypc and 100-yard games, Bell is probably your guy
but in today's NFL i'd gladly trade that consistency for the big-play potential Conner gives you
our offense is completely dead in the water the other day without Conner's 'chunk plays'
not just the 30-yard run that's a near-impossibility for Bell at this point, but the 6-8 yard carries on first down, the conversion on the ridiculous 3rd-and-long screen call, etc.
he's so clearly the better option in short yardage situations that i think there's a wing and a prayer we continue to use him in that role, but the other stuff is essentially gone with Bell's return and we know it
he strikes me as a guy who if granted the starting role is always going to impress one week and get completely stonewalled the next, at least as a rusher (though he's shown he can still contribute as a pass-catcher even in those games)
if you're looking for a consistent 4 ypc and 100-yard games, Bell is probably your guy
but in today's NFL i'd gladly trade that consistency for the big-play potential Conner gives you
our offense is completely dead in the water the other day without Conner's 'chunk plays'
not just the 30-yard run that's a near-impossibility for Bell at this point, but the 6-8 yard carries on first down, the conversion on the ridiculous 3rd-and-long screen call, etc.
he's so clearly the better option in short yardage situations that i think there's a wing and a prayer we continue to use him in that role, but the other stuff is essentially gone with Bell's return and we know it
-
stillthere
- Posts: 8537
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am
Chidi Iwuoma wrote:but in today's NFL i'd gladly trade that consistency for the big-play potential Conner gives you
our offense is completely dead in the water the other day without Conner's 'chunk plays'
not just the 30-yard run that's a near-impossibility for Bell at this point, but the 6-8 yard carries on first down, the conversion on the ridiculous 3rd-and-long screen call, etc.
Add to that the leap over the line for the TD. I didn't think that was in his tool bag.
Bell's 2017 season, showing some of his worst yards per carry games.
10 carries 32 yards 3.20 avg
27 carries 87 yards, 3.22 avg
15 carries 47 yards, 3.13 avg
35 carries 134 yards, 3.83 avg
25 carries 76 yards, 3.04 avg
26 carries 80 yards, 3.08 avg
12 carries 46 yards, 3.83 avg
13 carries 48 yards, 3.69 avg
Bell's 2017 season, showing some of his worst yards per catch games.
3 catches for 15 yards, 5.0 avg
4 catches for 4 yards, 1.0 avg
10 catches for 46 yards, 4.6 avg
3 catches for 12 yards, 4.0 avg
2 catches for 5 yards, 2.5 avg
5 catches for 32 yards, 6.4 avg
9 catches for 57 yards, 6.33 avg
5 catches for 28 yards, 5.6 avg
Now that is 8 games showing him with a pretty awful yards per carry, and that is 8 games where he had equally awful yards per catch.
This narrative that somehow Bell has more dominant games, or is more even keeled than James Conner looks to be false to me.
Some of those games, yikes, 4 catches for 4 yards? A 1 yard average??
Conner is averaging 10.9 yards a catch, Bell averaged 7.7 yards per catch last season. Conner is averaging more than 3.2 yards per catch over Bell.
You look at the games last season against Detroit and Indy, they kept giving carries to Bell, did not abandon the run, and he still only averaged 3.04 yards, 3.08 yards. Don't tell me that Bell is so consistent from game to game, no, he is not. That same game against Detroit he had 2 catches for 5 yards, a 2.5 yard average.
In 2016 these are some of Bell's yards per carry games:
20 carries for 66 yards, 3.3 avg
21 carries for 81 yards, 3.86 avg
14 carries for 32 yards, 2.29 avg
17 carries for 57 yards, 3.35 avg
Those last 3 games I listed all came in a 3 week period, all losses, and yes, we fell behind, felt the need to abandon the run and pass more, how is that any different than what Conner was faced with in games 2-4 this season? Really no difference at all.
Look, I think Bell coming back will be good for the offense in that Conner can stay fresh and maintain his physical running style. If he were to play the rest of the season like he did against Atlanta he might find himself wore down at the end of the season. I am all for Bell coming in and playing some, I don't know if I just give him his starting job back.
I think it is dubious to think he is going to be able to step on the field and not be rusty and out of sync. Happened last season and now he has a much longer layoff working against him.
10 carries 32 yards 3.20 avg
27 carries 87 yards, 3.22 avg
15 carries 47 yards, 3.13 avg
35 carries 134 yards, 3.83 avg
25 carries 76 yards, 3.04 avg
26 carries 80 yards, 3.08 avg
12 carries 46 yards, 3.83 avg
13 carries 48 yards, 3.69 avg
Bell's 2017 season, showing some of his worst yards per catch games.
3 catches for 15 yards, 5.0 avg
4 catches for 4 yards, 1.0 avg
10 catches for 46 yards, 4.6 avg
3 catches for 12 yards, 4.0 avg
2 catches for 5 yards, 2.5 avg
5 catches for 32 yards, 6.4 avg
9 catches for 57 yards, 6.33 avg
5 catches for 28 yards, 5.6 avg
Now that is 8 games showing him with a pretty awful yards per carry, and that is 8 games where he had equally awful yards per catch.
This narrative that somehow Bell has more dominant games, or is more even keeled than James Conner looks to be false to me.
Some of those games, yikes, 4 catches for 4 yards? A 1 yard average??
Conner is averaging 10.9 yards a catch, Bell averaged 7.7 yards per catch last season. Conner is averaging more than 3.2 yards per catch over Bell.
You look at the games last season against Detroit and Indy, they kept giving carries to Bell, did not abandon the run, and he still only averaged 3.04 yards, 3.08 yards. Don't tell me that Bell is so consistent from game to game, no, he is not. That same game against Detroit he had 2 catches for 5 yards, a 2.5 yard average.
In 2016 these are some of Bell's yards per carry games:
20 carries for 66 yards, 3.3 avg
21 carries for 81 yards, 3.86 avg
14 carries for 32 yards, 2.29 avg
17 carries for 57 yards, 3.35 avg
Those last 3 games I listed all came in a 3 week period, all losses, and yes, we fell behind, felt the need to abandon the run and pass more, how is that any different than what Conner was faced with in games 2-4 this season? Really no difference at all.
Look, I think Bell coming back will be good for the offense in that Conner can stay fresh and maintain his physical running style. If he were to play the rest of the season like he did against Atlanta he might find himself wore down at the end of the season. I am all for Bell coming in and playing some, I don't know if I just give him his starting job back.
I think it is dubious to think he is going to be able to step on the field and not be rusty and out of sync. Happened last season and now he has a much longer layoff working against him.
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
LakecrestSteeler wrote:That near fumble was another great play by the DB. If you watch it in slow motion, I think JC has awareness of where everyone is on the field. The DB whiffs on JC because he lifts his arm like a matador to prevent a fumble from a smashed helmet to forearm most likely, then he puts his arm down for more ball security and the DB because of his whiff does this back hand flail and miraculously strikes the ball. That man should have been out of the equation! JC will enter that into the vault. .
Did I see a different play? JC had his helmet yanked forward by Riley right before Kazee takes a shot at it. JC had just stiff-armed Riley and was turned toward the sideline. He was beginning to turn back towards the endzone as the ball got hit. I credit the fumble more to the surprise of his helmet being yanked than anything.
-
W&M_Steeler
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:55 am
Scunge wrote:Bell's 2017 season, showing some of his worst yards per carry games.
Look, I think Bell coming back will be good for the offense in that Conner can stay fresh and maintain his physical running style. If he were to play the rest of the season like he did against Atlanta he might find himself wore down at the end of the season. I am all for Bell coming in and playing some, I don't know if I just give him his starting job back.
I think it is dubious to think he is going to be able to step on the field and not be rusty and out of sync. Happened last season and now he has a much longer layoff working against him.
I think that it's almost guaranteed that Bell will come in rusty and out of sync. As you pointed out, it happened last year, and this year's holdout has been much longer. Judging from his wave runner video he doesn't look to be in great shape. Plus there's a new OC, so there are almost certainly new wrinkles (at least) the Bell will need to learn. Barring injury to Conner, I'd rather Bell not show up this year. Chances are he'd be more of a distraction and hindrance than a positive.
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
W&M_Steeler wrote:Scunge wrote:Bell's 2017 season, showing some of his worst yards per carry games.
Look, I think Bell coming back will be good for the offense in that Conner can stay fresh and maintain his physical running style. If he were to play the rest of the season like he did against Atlanta he might find himself wore down at the end of the season. I am all for Bell coming in and playing some, I don't know if I just give him his starting job back.
I think it is dubious to think he is going to be able to step on the field and not be rusty and out of sync. Happened last season and now he has a much longer layoff working against him.
I think that it's almost guaranteed that Bell will come in rusty and out of sync. As you pointed out, it happened last year, and this year's holdout has been much longer. Judging from his wave runner video he doesn't look to be in great shape. Plus there's a new OC, so there are almost certainly new wrinkles (at least) the Bell will need to learn. Barring injury to Conner, I'd rather Bell not show up this year. Chances are he'd be more of a distraction and hindrance than a positive.
THIS
W&M_Steeler wrote:Scunge wrote:Bell's 2017 season, showing some of his worst yards per carry games.
Look, I think Bell coming back will be good for the offense in that Conner can stay fresh and maintain his physical running style. If he were to play the rest of the season like he did against Atlanta he might find himself wore down at the end of the season. I am all for Bell coming in and playing some, I don't know if I just give him his starting job back.
I think it is dubious to think he is going to be able to step on the field and not be rusty and out of sync. Happened last season and now he has a much longer layoff working against him.
I think that it's almost guaranteed that Bell will come in rusty and out of sync. As you pointed out, it happened last year, and this year's holdout has been much longer. Judging from his wave runner video he doesn't look to be in great shape. Plus there's a new OC, so there are almost certainly new wrinkles (at least) the Bell will need to learn. Barring injury to Conner, I'd rather Bell not show up this year. Chances are he'd be more of a distraction and hindrance than a positive.
Bell wants his workload limited.
He'll likely be James Conner's biggest fan (meaning: the more Conner plays, the less wear and tear on Bell's body.)
They will coexist just fine.
"...It's very difficult to keep the line between the past and the present... Do you know what I mean...?"
Edith 'Little Edie' Bouvier Beale
Edith 'Little Edie' Bouvier Beale
I have changed my mind in this topic
James Conner should be th starting rb even when bell comes back.
For a number of reasons
Chief of which in my mind is that this team desparatly needs some guys fighting for everything
I have little doubt Tomlin gives bell his job back but I wouldn't
James Conner should be th starting rb even when bell comes back.
For a number of reasons
Chief of which in my mind is that this team desparatly needs some guys fighting for everything
I have little doubt Tomlin gives bell his job back but I wouldn't
Gonzo wrote:I have changed my mind in this topic
James Conner should be th starting rb even when bell comes back.
For a number of reasons
Chief of which in my mind is that this team desparatly needs some guys fighting for everything
I have little doubt Tomlin gives bell his job back but I wouldn't
We'll likely need both to make a run this year.
"...It's very difficult to keep the line between the past and the present... Do you know what I mean...?"
Edith 'Little Edie' Bouvier Beale
Edith 'Little Edie' Bouvier Beale
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
KC wrote:Gonzo wrote:I have changed my mind in this topic
James Conner should be th starting rb even when bell comes back.
For a number of reasons
Chief of which in my mind is that this team desparatly needs some guys fighting for everything
I have little doubt Tomlin gives bell his job back but I wouldn't
We'll likely need both to make a run this year.
Exactly. I’m not totally convinced bell will ere play this year, but let all these teams get banged up to shit.
Do I want to see bell on fresh legs in week 12? Yeah
Make that hell yeah.
The news on bell is so hard to figure out. But near as I can decipher he is not pleased about the prospect of Steelers using the transition tag on him. And sounds like he may be willing to play this season so he can get to true FA with no strings or even resign with Steelers. I seriously think that’s a possibility now.
Any rate one of the top O players in the game today returns to the fold for the stretch you don’t look that gift horse in the mouth
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
And James Conner to me is like Jessie James or Ramon foster. You need value guys like these. There’s nothing wrong with guys like these.
But when James Conner is featured Steelers tie the browns. When lev bell is featured Steelers win out the season and clinch home playoff game.
Not knocking Conner the dude or his season. He clearly belongs and I hope he’s part of the team long term.
But let’s not confuse contributor to season defining player
But when James Conner is featured Steelers tie the browns. When lev bell is featured Steelers win out the season and clinch home playoff game.
Not knocking Conner the dude or his season. He clearly belongs and I hope he’s part of the team long term.
But let’s not confuse contributor to season defining player
When James Conner was featured, they beat the Falcons. Two of their non-losses featured Conner. Both their losses didn't.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...
it's still yggy wrote:And James Conner to me is like Jessie James or Ramon foster. You need value guys like these. There’s nothing wrong with guys like these.
But when James Conner is featured Steelers tie the browns. When lev bell is featured Steelers win out the season and clinch home playoff game.
Not knocking Conner the dude or his season. He clearly belongs and I hope he’s part of the team long term.
But let’s not confuse contributor to season defining player
Maybe if we had a few more guys that gave a shit the steelers would have a season worthy of some definition in the last ten
Gonzo wrote:it's still yggy wrote:And James Conner to me is like Jessie James or Ramon foster. You need value guys like these. There’s nothing wrong with guys like these.
But when James Conner is featured Steelers tie the browns. When lev bell is featured Steelers win out the season and clinch home playoff game.
Not knocking Conner the dude or his season. He clearly belongs and I hope he’s part of the team long term.
But let’s not confuse contributor to season defining player
Maybe if we had a few more guys that gave a shit the steelers would have a season worthy of some definition in the last ten
Agreed.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...
-
stillthere
- Posts: 8537
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am
it's still yggy wrote:And James Conner to me is like Jessie James or Ramon foster. You need value guys like these. There’s nothing wrong with guys like these.
But when James Conner is featured Steelers tie the browns. When lev bell is featured Steelers win out the season and clinch home playoff game.
Not knocking Conner the dude or his season. He clearly belongs and I hope he’s part of the team long term.
But let’s not confuse contributor to season defining player
While Conner had a fumble in the Browns game I would say the fact that the QB was involved with another 5 turnovers is why you tie the browns. Also it is clear that Conner is a better football player than either James or Foster. That comparison is disingenuous.
- bradshaw2ben
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30411
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
stillthere wrote:it's still yggy wrote:And James Conner to me is like Jessie James or Ramon foster. You need value guys like these. There’s nothing wrong with guys like these.
But when James Conner is featured Steelers tie the browns. When lev bell is featured Steelers win out the season and clinch home playoff game.
Not knocking Conner the dude or his season. He clearly belongs and I hope he’s part of the team long term.
But let’s not confuse contributor to season defining player
While Conner had a fumble in the Browns game I would say the fact that the QB was involved with another 5 turnovers is why you tie the browns. Also it is clear that Conner is a better football player than either James or Foster. That comparison is disingenuous.
Conner is not a better player than Foster, sorry.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin
B2B, yeah, comparing a player who has some 120 starts to a player who has started just 5 games, who is to say who is a better player??
Again, who is to say that Conner won't develop into a real good RB? Maybe he will end up being a better player than Foster as we look at him two years from now?
I think we shouldn't dismiss that Conner is probably a MORE Valuable player than Foster at this point. If Foster goes down we can just insert Finney and perhaps not really miss much. If Conner goes down? It is debatable if Ridley can do what Conner has done, especially as a receiver and probably as a pass blocker too.
In terms of Bell coming back I hope that they take Bell OFF the field on obvious passing situations. What? Is that laughter I hear? Making fun of my idea to take Bell off the field for Conner??
Yes, I am totally serious. Bell last year averaged 7.7 yards per catch. He had 85 catches and only produced 31 first downs, a 36.5% first down rate.
Conner this season is averaging 10.9 yards per catch, has 22 catches and has produced 10 first downs, a 45.5% first down rate. Lev Bell fans can suck it, Conner is the more effective pass catcher out of the backfield.
All of this nonsense that Bell is special as a pass catcher, that he is elite, what a joke. Defenses want the Steelers to throw to Bell, it means less first downs converted, less big plays. What Conner is doing this year proves it. Bell can't break tackles like Conner and his diminishing speed and quickness does not let him evade tacklers like he did in 2014.
Again, who is to say that Conner won't develop into a real good RB? Maybe he will end up being a better player than Foster as we look at him two years from now?
I think we shouldn't dismiss that Conner is probably a MORE Valuable player than Foster at this point. If Foster goes down we can just insert Finney and perhaps not really miss much. If Conner goes down? It is debatable if Ridley can do what Conner has done, especially as a receiver and probably as a pass blocker too.
In terms of Bell coming back I hope that they take Bell OFF the field on obvious passing situations. What? Is that laughter I hear? Making fun of my idea to take Bell off the field for Conner??
Yes, I am totally serious. Bell last year averaged 7.7 yards per catch. He had 85 catches and only produced 31 first downs, a 36.5% first down rate.
Conner this season is averaging 10.9 yards per catch, has 22 catches and has produced 10 first downs, a 45.5% first down rate. Lev Bell fans can suck it, Conner is the more effective pass catcher out of the backfield.
All of this nonsense that Bell is special as a pass catcher, that he is elite, what a joke. Defenses want the Steelers to throw to Bell, it means less first downs converted, less big plays. What Conner is doing this year proves it. Bell can't break tackles like Conner and his diminishing speed and quickness does not let him evade tacklers like he did in 2014.
I think quality teams love it when we focus on the run and run extension passing
Gonzo wrote:I think quality teams love it when we focus on the run and run extension passing
With the exception of the Miami Dolphins and Kansas City Chefs in the playoffs the other year.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...
-
stillthere
- Posts: 8537
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am
For those of you who have facebook this link has some nice ground level camera angles of Conner vs the Falcons in wk 5. It is like 3 mins long.
https://www.facebook.com/steelers/videos/437342753461022/
https://www.facebook.com/steelers/videos/437342753461022/
- bradshaw2ben
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30411
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Adjusted for Defenses faced:
27th in yards above avg replacement (-12)
24th in DVOA (-11.9)
22nd in success rate (45%)
As RB receiver:
6th in DYAR (62)
6th in DVOA (29.1)
18th in catch rate (79%
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb
27th in yards above avg replacement (-12)
24th in DVOA (-11.9)
22nd in success rate (45%)
As RB receiver:
6th in DYAR (62)
6th in DVOA (29.1)
18th in catch rate (79%
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin
- Drummer Boy
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 8:26 pm
bradshaw2ben wrote:Adjusted for Defenses faced:
27th in yards above avg replacement (-12)
24th in DVOA (-11.9)
22nd in success rate (45%)
As RB receiver:
6th in DYAR (62)
6th in DVOA (29.1)
18th in catch rate (79%
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb
Thanks. Was wondering about the Football Outsiders take.
