Poltargyst wrote:Why do I keep seeing Romo's name in this conversation? Romo shouldn't be anywhere near this conversation.
Probably overstepping, but f it, Romo might be the most underrated QB of the modern era.
Poltargyst wrote:Why do I keep seeing Romo's name in this conversation? Romo shouldn't be anywhere near this conversation.
Lifelongsteel wrote:For perspective here are the top 10 passer ratings (+ a few other "modern" guys with conf titles and SB titles) and years
1. Rodgers (1/1) - 14
2. Wilson (2/1) - 7
3. Brees (1/1) - 18
4. Brady (8/5) - 19
5. Romo (0/0) - 13
6. Young (1/1) - 15
7. P. Manning (4/2) - 18
8. Rivers (0/0) - 15
9. COUSINS! (0/0) - 7
10. Ryan (1/0) - 11
11. Ben (3/2) - 15
12. Warner (3/1) - 12
16. Luck (0/0) - 7
31. Favre (2/1) - 20
41. Flacco (1/1) - 11
42. E. Manning (2/2) - 15
bradshaw2ben wrote:Romo all time ranks
5th in passer rating
6th in YPA
17th in 4th Quarter comebacks
20th in GWD
18th in career win pct (min 75 wins)... just ahead of Dan Marino
Since 1994, 3rd highest in 4th Quarter Comeback success rate per opportunity (.471), behind only Andrew Luck (somewhere around .520)
Tom Brady (somewhere around .500)
Peyton Manning (.489)
and just ahead of
Ben Roethlisberger (around .450)
Bingo. I came here to post exactly this.Stlcrtn1974 wrote:Actually Jordan is smart. The last asshole, Jalen Ramsey, to make a comment about Ben not being elite caused him to play like shit for 3 quarters. If he plays like shit for 3 quarters, Saint's will win. Just trying to get in his head.
Stlcrtn1974 wrote:Actually Jordan is smart. The last asshole, Jalen Ramsey, to make a comment about Ben not being elite caused him to play like shit for 3 quarters. If he plays like shit for 3 quarters, Saint's will win. Just trying to get in his head.
Poltargyst wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:Romo all time ranks
5th in passer rating
6th in YPA
17th in 4th Quarter comebacks
20th in GWD
18th in career win pct (min 75 wins)... just ahead of Dan Marino
Since 1994, 3rd highest in 4th Quarter Comeback success rate per opportunity (.471), behind only Andrew Luck (somewhere around .520)
Tom Brady (somewhere around .500)
Peyton Manning (.489)
and just ahead of
Ben Roethlisberger (around .450)
And yet somehow when I think of Romo, the enduring image is of him choking away playoff games.
W&M_Steeler wrote:Without the allegations, I think Ben would be treated like this generation's Elway. He's probably lost tens of million of dollars in endorsement deals. I also think that the NFL and the media would like to keep him out of the HoF if possible. It'll be interesting to see how ESPN responds to Jordan's comment tomorrow. Will there be segments on First Take and Golic and the Greenie show debating where Ben is in the era and concluding that he is not top 5? I wouldn't be surprised. I think they'll use Eli as an argument for keeping Ben out of the Top 5 / HoF and vice versa.
W&M_Steeler wrote:W&M_Steeler wrote:Without the allegations, I think Ben would be treated like this generation's Elway. He's probably lost tens of million of dollars in endorsement deals. I also think that the NFL and the media would like to keep him out of the HoF if possible. It'll be interesting to see how ESPN responds to Jordan's comment tomorrow. Will there be segments on First Take and Golic and the Greenie show debating where Ben is in the era and concluding that he is not top 5? I wouldn't be surprised. I think they'll use Eli as an argument for keeping Ben out of the Top 5 / HoF and vice versa.
They just discussed Cam Jordan's comments on Golic & Wingo. The three of them (Golic, Golc Jr. & Wingo) all agreed that Ben is a Hall of Famer, but they also all agreed that he is the 6th best QB of the era, behind P. Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Brees, and Rivers.
W&M_Steeler wrote:W&M_Steeler wrote:Without the allegations, I think Ben would be treated like this generation's Elway. He's probably lost tens of million of dollars in endorsement deals. I also think that the NFL and the media would like to keep him out of the HoF if possible. It'll be interesting to see how ESPN responds to Jordan's comment tomorrow. Will there be segments on First Take and Golic and the Greenie show debating where Ben is in the era and concluding that he is not top 5? I wouldn't be surprised. I think they'll use Eli as an argument for keeping Ben out of the Top 5 / HoF and vice versa.
They just discussed Cam Jordan's comments on Golic & Wingo. The three of them (Golic, Golc Jr. & Wingo) all agreed that Ben is a Hall of Famer, but they also all agreed that he is the 6th best QB of the era, behind P. Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Brees, and Rivers.
Poltargyst wrote:Steelafan77 wrote:I think it's debatable Ben is Better than Both Mannings. There I said it.
Eli yes Peyton maybe not.
SP wrote:W&M_Steeler wrote:W&M_Steeler wrote:Without the allegations, I think Ben would be treated like this generation's Elway. He's probably lost tens of million of dollars in endorsement deals. I also think that the NFL and the media would like to keep him out of the HoF if possible. It'll be interesting to see how ESPN responds to Jordan's comment tomorrow. Will there be segments on First Take and Golic and the Greenie show debating where Ben is in the era and concluding that he is not top 5? I wouldn't be surprised. I think they'll use Eli as an argument for keeping Ben out of the Top 5 / HoF and vice versa.
They just discussed Cam Jordan's comments on Golic & Wingo. The three of them (Golic, Golc Jr. & Wingo) all agreed that Ben is a Hall of Famer, but they also all agreed that he is the 6th best QB of the era, behind P. Manning, Brady, Rodgers, Brees, and Rivers.
How the fuck is Rivers better than Ben? Played in sunny SoCal his entire career and has similar stats to Ben, but not the wins, no rings, nothing historic about him.
Stlcrtn1974 wrote:Actually Jordan is smart. The last asshole, Jalen Ramsey, to make a comment about Ben not being elite caused him to play like shit for 3 quarters. If he plays like shit for 3 quarters, Saint's will win. Just trying to get in his head.
the-other-burg wrote:Ben won a Super Bowl with Mike Tomlin as his head coach. That right there makes him a first ballot HOF'er.
bradshaw2ben wrote:All I know is: if a team is playing one game to decide whether I live or die, there are only a handful of guys from the Super Bowl Era I'd ever have in that conversation. A big factor is: a QB who can win in any style of game the opponent wants to play, in any weather, in any stadium, in any timeframe/rules of that Super Bowl era.
Bradshaw
Montana
Ben
Brady
Favre
Brees
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Rodgers
Warner
Romo
Starr
I think that's the beginning and the end of the discussion. I'm knocking Marino & Romo for inability to do whatever it takes to win more of the biggest games than not. Elway & Favre at their peak could beat anyone, but they had a lot less consistency than some others. Starr would have issues in the modern game. Brady would be destroyed in a 70s era game after the second hit in the face. Guys like Lambert & Greene would listen to about 5 seconds of that guy whining and introduce him to a forearm shiver or head shot and they'd call the ambulance. Brees is an inconsistent winner with loads of talent but inflated success from playing in sunny SD and a dome for his career. If you play the game for your life in a dome or in Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers might get it done... but a road game or a close game, GTFO. Peyton's sphincter got the best of him in big games much too consistently. That leaves Bradshaw, Montana, Ben, Staubach, Warner. In my mind, those are the best 5 QBs of the Super Bowl era.
bradshaw2ben wrote:W&M_Steeler wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:All I know is: if a team is playing one game to decide whether I live or die, there are only a handful of guys from the Super Bowl Era I'd ever have in that conversation. A big factor is: a QB who can win in any style of game the opponent wants to play, in any weather, in any stadium, in any timeframe/rules of that Super Bowl era.
Bradshaw
Montana
Ben
Brady
Favre
Brees
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Rodgers
Warner
Romo
Starr
I think that's the beginning and the end of the discussion. I'm knocking Marino & Romo for inability to do whatever it takes to win more of the biggest games than not. Elway & Favre at their peak could beat anyone, but they had a lot less consistency than some others. Starr would have issues in the modern game. Brady would be destroyed in a 70s era game after the second hit in the face. Guys like Lambert & Greene would listen to about 5 seconds of that guy whining and introduce him to a forearm shiver or head shot and they'd call the ambulance. Brees is an inconsistent winner with loads of talent but inflated success from playing in sunny SD and a dome for his career. If you play the game for your life in a dome or in Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers might get it done... but a road game or a close game, GTFO. Peyton's sphincter got the best of him in big games much too consistently. That leaves Bradshaw, Montana, Ben, Staubach, Warner. In my mind, those are the best 5 QBs of the Super Bowl era.
No way would I put Warner ahead of guys like Elway or Favre. I don't see how you can criticize them for inconsistency but not Warner, who had five middling to poor seasons in the middle of his career.
That's fair, but Kurt was $$$ in the postseason. Got ripped off by the Pats and beaten last second by the Steelers--facing a legendary defense, the GOAT coach and two HOF QBs plus no slouch Steve McNair.
SP wrote:Doug Gotleib and Robert Klemko have been quick to join in. Klemko compared Ben to Dave Krieg. Gotleib has hated Ben and the Steelers for years.
W&M_Steeler wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:All I know is: if a team is playing one game to decide whether I live or die, there are only a handful of guys from the Super Bowl Era I'd ever have in that conversation. A big factor is: a QB who can win in any style of game the opponent wants to play, in any weather, in any stadium, in any timeframe/rules of that Super Bowl era.
Bradshaw
Montana
Ben
Brady
Favre
Brees
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Rodgers
Warner
Romo
Starr
I think that's the beginning and the end of the discussion. I'm knocking Marino & Romo for inability to do whatever it takes to win more of the biggest games than not. Elway & Favre at their peak could beat anyone, but they had a lot less consistency than some others. Starr would have issues in the modern game. Brady would be destroyed in a 70s era game after the second hit in the face. Guys like Lambert & Greene would listen to about 5 seconds of that guy whining and introduce him to a forearm shiver or head shot and they'd call the ambulance. Brees is an inconsistent winner with loads of talent but inflated success from playing in sunny SD and a dome for his career. If you play the game for your life in a dome or in Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers might get it done... but a road game or a close game, GTFO. Peyton's sphincter got the best of him in big games much too consistently. That leaves Bradshaw, Montana, Ben, Staubach, Warner. In my mind, those are the best 5 QBs of the Super Bowl era.
No way would I put Warner ahead of guys like Elway or Favre. I don't see how you can criticize them for inconsistency but not Warner, who had five middling to poor seasons in the middle of his career.
bradshaw2ben wrote:All I know is: if a team is playing one game to decide whether I live or die, there are only a handful of guys from the Super Bowl Era I'd ever have in that conversation. A big factor is: a QB who can win in any style of game the opponent wants to play, in any weather, in any stadium, in any timeframe/rules of that Super Bowl era.
Bradshaw
Montana
Ben
Brady
Favre
Brees
Staubach
Elway
Marino
Rodgers
Warner
Romo
Starr
I think that's the beginning and the end of the discussion. I'm knocking Marino & Romo for inability to do whatever it takes to win more of the biggest games than not. Elway & Favre at their peak could beat anyone, but they had a lot less consistency than some others. Starr would have issues in the modern game. Brady would be destroyed in a 70s era game after the second hit in the face. Guys like Lambert & Greene would listen to about 5 seconds of that guy whining and introduce him to a forearm shiver or head shot and they'd call the ambulance. Brees is an inconsistent winner with loads of talent but inflated success from playing in sunny SD and a dome for his career. If you play the game for your life in a dome or in Green Bay, Aaron Rodgers might get it done... but a road game or a close game, GTFO. Peyton's sphincter got the best of him in big games much too consistently. That leaves Bradshaw, Montana, Ben, Staubach, Warner. In my mind, those are the best 5 QBs of the Super Bowl era.
GreekSteel wrote:When did Brady face Chuck Noll?