Ice wrote:I think Williams will get play against the Patriots because they're going to come out run heavy on us, if they watched any of last year's tape.
Oh yeah, the cheats are gonna look to impose their will



Ice wrote:I think Williams will get play against the Patriots because they're going to come out run heavy on us, if they watched any of last year's tape.
Lynch wrote:Ice wrote:I think Williams will get play against the Patriots because they're going to come out run heavy on us, if they watched any of last year's tape.
Oh yeah, the cheats are gonna look to impose their willI fully expect them to come out with a fullback and tight end
We better see if we cant get a couple Casey Hampton's up front to keep our Williams' clean
Ice wrote:Not to mention our run defense was pretty piss poor last season, and is one of the major things we need to improve on this season. We will be tested early and often, starting with the Pats game.
Ice wrote:I should hope not, Jobu, but "starter" is going to be pretty much an honorary thing moving forward, anyway, with the amount of package defense being played. Can we stop the run with a big nickel package? Would certainly help if we could.
Something mentioned above that gives some hope is that both defensive FA signings are known to take pride in tackling. It's been an issue for a while.
Ice wrote:Not to mention our run defense was pretty piss poor last season, and is one of the major things we need to improve on this season. We will be tested early and often, starting with the Pats game.
Steelafan77 wrote:Ice wrote:Not to mention our run defense was pretty piss poor last season, and is one of the major things we need to improve on this season. We will be tested early and often, starting with the Pats game.
I'm thinking the run defense wasn't great because of the lack of speed in the middle. Shazier covered up a huge weakness for that defense. I think they may start DWill but could replace him by the 2nd quarter with Bush. DWill isn't known for his speed. I expect help from secondary as well. I think Austin/Bradley will have them coached up and ready for that scenario. The pass defense is still going to be a work in progress. I hope to see one or shockingly two INT's in this game with many PD's. That pretty much sets the tone IMO for this defense going into the 2019 campaign.
Scunge wrote:I scratch my head when people talk about how our run defense was piss poor, pathetic, terrible, whathaveyou. Really??
Explain it to me. How was our run defense so bad??
For the season of 2018 our run defense was:
6th fewest rushing yards per game, 96.1 yards per game. The Bears were the best, #1 in giving up just 80 rushing yards per game, the Arizona Cardinals worst, 32nd in giving up 155 yards per game. We were 6th, how is that terrible, how is that piss poor???
Tied for 9th with the Buffalo Bills in giving up 4.2 yards per carry, only 8 teams gave up fewer yards per carry. Teams like the KC Chiefs and LA Rams, Seahawks and Patriots were all giving up around 5.0 yards per carry. Again, enlighten me, how is that a poor run defense???
The Steeler defense was 12th in first down percentage, 22.8%. The Texans and Bears were around 19.8%. A lower ranking but still within spitting distance of a top 10 ranking.
The Steelers gave up just 1 40+ yard run, a 51 yard run, the Jaguars gave up 5 40+ yard runs, the Oakland Raiders gave up 7 40+ yard runs. In 2017 the Steeler defense gave up 3 40+ yard runs, one of them being a 90 yard TD. Sorry but that is improvement, to go from 3 to 1?
In terms of giving up 20+ yard runs, we were 10th overall, giving up 10 runs of 20+ yards. The Texans were first with giving up just 3, and the Ravens were 2nd in giving up 6 such runs, we gave up 10 and were ranked 10th overall. Now if we were the Jets and gave up a whopping 24 runs over 20+ yards then yeah, I would agree that our run defense was pathetic, piss poor, yada, yada, yada, but we are not the NY Jets, are we???
What about forcing fumbles on runs?? Yeah, that needs to improve, we were ranked 18th overall, getting 5 fumbles, which was an improvement over the previous year where we had 4. The Ravens by the way only had 2 and the Bears had the same amount that we did with 5.
Giving up rushing touchdowns?? Sure, we gave up 13 TDs on the year, which was tied for 15th. The Bears gave up the fewest with 5 and Arizona gave up the most with 25. Again, yes, could be much, much better but not really the disaster that many would make it out to be.
I don't know, if you ask me, even with the loss of Shazier, and the merry go round of Bostic and then LJ Fort partnering with Williams, the insertion of a rookie SS in Edmunds playing far too much then was planned, having Sean Davis playing FS for the first time, etc, etc, didn't this run defense actually do pretty damn well??
And doesn't it bode well for this season in that we have a shiny first round pick in Devin Bush at ILB as well as Mark Barron?? Sure it does, and it really makes all of this hand wringing about teams going to run against us at will seem rather silly. Doesn't it??
Lynch wrote:Speed has very little to do with it in that aspect. I could go out there and make a stop in most cases. In the short passing game you must be MUCH faster.
Steelafan77 wrote:Lynch wrote:Speed has very little to do with it in that aspect. I could go out there and make a stop in most cases. In the short passing game you must be MUCH faster.
Speed has EVERYTHING to do with Stopping the Run as well as Pass Defending. Losing Shazier was a tipping point (IMO) for this defense because of the loss of the speed he brought to the table. I guess I could have worded it 'overall defensive speed' or something...![]()
To Scunge, while 6th run defense is good and it is in the top 10..., still needs improvement. "Not Great" was the adjective I Used. Never stated it was poor, lousy, terrible, pathetic or any other over reactive description.
Further, I do agree with your point about the new shiny pieces the Steelers brought in through FA and the Draft. All Of Whom are shown to have SPEED! Even a blind man can see the Steelers focus is on SPEED for the defense.
Yup. I'm drowning in humidity here in NYC. 90+ and 65% humidity.Ice wrote:Edit: It's 93 and feels like 100 here in beautiful Dewey Beach, Delaware, so it's either cockeyed optimism or heat stroke.
Steelafan77 wrote:Lynch wrote:Speed has very little to do with it in that aspect. I could go out there and make a stop in most cases. In the short passing game you must be MUCH faster.
Speed has EVERYTHING to do with Stopping the Run as well as Pass Defending. Losing Shazier was a tipping point (IMO) for this defense because of the loss of the speed he brought to the table. I guess I could have worded it 'overall defensive speed' or something...![]()
To Scunge, while 6th run defense is good and it is in the top 10..., still needs improvement. "Not Great" was the adjective I Used. Never stated it was poor, lousy, terrible, pathetic or any other over reactive description.
Further, I do agree with your point about the new shiny pieces the Steelers brought in through FA and the Draft. All Of Whom are shown to have SPEED! Even a blind man can see the Steelers focus is on SPEED for the defense.
Scunge wrote:I scratch my head when people talk about how our run defense was piss poor, pathetic, terrible, whathaveyou. Really??
Explain it to me. How was our run defense so bad??
For the season of 2018 our run defense was:
6th fewest rushing yards per game, 96.1 yards per game. The Bears were the best, #1 in giving up just 80 rushing yards per game, the Arizona Cardinals worst, 32nd in giving up 155 yards per game. We were 6th, how is that terrible, how is that piss poor???
Tied for 9th with the Buffalo Bills in giving up 4.2 yards per carry, only 8 teams gave up fewer yards per carry. Teams like the KC Chiefs and LA Rams, Seahawks and Patriots were all giving up around 5.0 yards per carry. Again, enlighten me, how is that a poor run defense???
The Steeler defense was 12th in first down percentage, 22.8%. The Texans and Bears were around 19.8%. A lower ranking but still within spitting distance of a top 10 ranking.
The Steelers gave up just 1 40+ yard run, a 51 yard run, the Jaguars gave up 5 40+ yard runs, the Oakland Raiders gave up 7 40+ yard runs. In 2017 the Steeler defense gave up 3 40+ yard runs, one of them being a 90 yard TD. Sorry but that is improvement, to go from 3 to 1?
In terms of giving up 20+ yard runs, we were 10th overall, giving up 10 runs of 20+ yards. The Texans were first with giving up just 3, and the Ravens were 2nd in giving up 6 such runs, we gave up 10 and were ranked 10th overall. Now if we were the Jets and gave up a whopping 24 runs over 20+ yards then yeah, I would agree that our run defense was pathetic, piss poor, yada, yada, yada, but we are not the NY Jets, are we???
What about forcing fumbles on runs?? Yeah, that needs to improve, we were ranked 18th overall, getting 5 fumbles, which was an improvement over the previous year where we had 4. The Ravens by the way only had 2 and the Bears had the same amount that we did with 5.
Giving up rushing touchdowns?? Sure, we gave up 13 TDs on the year, which was tied for 15th. The Bears gave up the fewest with 5 and Arizona gave up the most with 25. Again, yes, could be much, much better but not really the disaster that many would make it out to be.
I don't know, if you ask me, even with the loss of Shazier, and the merry go round of Bostic and then LJ Fort partnering with Williams, the insertion of a rookie SS in Edmunds playing far too much then was planned, having Sean Davis playing FS for the first time, etc, etc, didn't this run defense actually do pretty damn well??
And doesn't it bode well for this season in that we have a shiny first round pick in Devin Bush at ILB as well as Mark Barron?? Sure it does, and it really makes all of this hand wringing about teams going to run against us at will seem rather silly. Doesn't it??
Ice wrote:Not to mention our run defense was pretty piss poor last season, and is one of the major things we need to improve on this season. We will be tested early and often, starting with the Pats game.
So Far, So Good! Looking like Moncrief all but assured himself the #2 WR role. No doubt a lock for the roster already. Seems like the Steelers may have struck Gold in free agency this season, again. Wait and see mode as we hope all this good news translates to the regular season and dare I say Postseason?“When he came in, I wasn’t sure what to expect,” Roethlisberger said. “Obviously, we played against him and I’ve seen him go against us in game situations, but I didn’t know him. Now, you see his work ethic, the type of person he is, the desire to be great. He has a knowledge of the offense already.
“I’ll give him no-huddle stuff, and I’ll give him a signal, and I’ll say, ‘Are you good?’ and he’ll say, yeah. … I’ve enjoyed the ability to work with him and opportunity to know him so far.”
“I’ve been extremely proud of what he’s done since the day he got here,” Fichtner said. “I don’t know if he’s missed one day in this building. That’s been exciting. He brings an unbelievable professional attitude, and that’s encouraging.”
“For a guy that hadn’t been in the system, he’s really done some things that are innate,” Drake said. “He does some things that come natural. Picking up the system, there are times when you get a guy, you bring him in and he’s been in two or three different systems and those systems start running together.
“But he’s been able to distinguish the differences and go out there and do things that make my job a lot easier because he has a feel for the position. One thing he’s doing is playing with a lot of confidence, and Ben has confidence in him. He’s just got to continue to grow.”
https://triblive.com/sports/receiver-do ... -steelers/
Ice wrote:A lot of those are dependent statistics, Scunge.
Scunge wrote:Ice wrote:A lot of those are dependent statistics, Scunge.
Dependent on what exactly Ice?? When we won Super Bowls in 05 and 08, I believe we gave up 80 and 86 yards rushing per game on defense those seasons. Casey Hampton was the NT, he was surrounded by a lot of Pro Bowlers and a lot of players that had years, years, of experience playing together. There were battle tested, they had cohesion, they had trust and a mind meld thing going on.
Many criticize Hargrave for not being a Casey Hampton traditional NT. Many say we suck at playing the run, yet we gave up just one run over 40+ yards (2nd fewest in the NFL), gave up just 4.2 yards per carry (9th lowest total), and gave up 96 yards per game rushing (6th lowest total).
Wow, so the terrible NT that we had in Hargrave, those incompetent ILBs that we had in Bostic, Fort and Williams, those terrible safeties that we had in Davis and Edmunds, those bums that we had in Dupree and Watt at OLB, is it any wonder we gave up 96 yards per game???
steel wrote: ....So maybe that's why our current run Defense stats look "good" in comparison to 2005. Because we get regularly shredded by the passing game, so teams do not need to run on us.