Who on our offense is a top 20 player at their position?

[Roeth2Rudolph]

Reading comprehension.

Can I emphasize that enough?

Well now this turned out to be funny.

Here is some cheap advice, next time before commenting on a thread read the title....

Careful man. Corten won't want to invest with you. You don't want to miss out on that chunk of revenue.

[yygy]

I’d put Najee top 20. He can do a lot of things we’ll now and will get better.

WR is a bigger pool. Talking about 100 guys there. I’d put DH in the 20s. Hate to say it but put claypool in buffalo or la or kc and probably is talked about a lot more.

I’ve been critical of Ben (with good reason) but I bet the big lug finishes in the top.

Good point about how qb ratinf alone pretty good indicator of overall team performance.

[Roeth2Rudolph]

I’ve been critical of Ben (with good reason) but I bet the big lug finishes in the top.
performance.

What are you drinking this evening?

[SteelPro]

Are there even 20 Fullbacks in the NFL? I don’t think so. Therefore Derek Watt is top 20 at his position.

[Jizz Mop]

Are there even 20 Fullbacks in the NFL? I don’t think so. Therefore Derek Watt is top 20 at his position.

0 rushes for 0 yards

1 catch for 3 yards

Lucky to have him

[Steeler Owl]

But your assertion still stands?

And you can prove otherwise?

Yeah. I thought so, smart ass .

What are you drunk? You cant prove your assertion--which wasnt a response to OP. Mick didnt ask who has the potential to be top 20. Every player in the NFL has the potential to be top 20 at his pos. My opinion is that no one on Steelers off right now is top 20. My proof is the season so far. If the Steelers first drive vs Denver is the new standard I will reconsider.

[COR-TEN]

But your assertion still stands?

And you can prove otherwise?

Yeah. I thought so, smart ass .

What are you drunk?

I could ask you the same question.

[Steeler Owl]

Yeah you could if I had

1. Totally misread the initial post then

2. Lectured us on the importance of context then

3. Based an unprovable assertion on an incorrect premise then

4. Just kept stridently arguing while sprinkling in some unibrow namecalling.

[COR-TEN]

Yeah you could if I had

1. Totally misread the initial post then

2. Lectured us on the importance of context then

3. Based an unprovable assertion on an incorrect premise then

4. Just kept stridently arguing while sprinkling in some unibrow namecalling.

So. Lets review, smart ass.

1 yes. I misread the initial post. Thank you for giving me the benefit of the doubt. Not.
2. I lectured those that cherry picked my post to fit their narrative.
3; An assertion that you can't refute and is based on an assumption of yours that isn't verified either.
4. I'm not name calling. You come here acting like a smart ass, so if the shoe fits.

Fine. Fuck off. I'm done here. You don't give a shit about content. You, like others, give as shit about winning an ideological battle on a footbal forum than content. That's apparent.

I realize you aren't some one that I would like to spend time with or even waste my intellectual energy on. So we are clear on that. Carry on.

[Steeler Owl]

I bow to your genius and your sparkling other-directed personality.