Okorafor Benched For Naughty Words

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
ol skool
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:10 pm

Re: Okorafor Benched For Naughty Words

Post by ol skool » Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:17 pm

Smashmouth21 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 6:26 pm
ol skool wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 6:06 pm
Smashmouth21 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:37 pm
Chuks is about as meh as meh can be. At his salary he’s a goner. Expect OC and OT with two of the top four picks next draft.
I'll say it again: It's easy to play GM and find a RT and C in the draft and imagine them starting day one. I do it all the time. Hell, we do mocks with the goal in mind of fixing all of a team's problems in one draft. :lol:

It's more likely, however, that we'd grab either a RT or C in FA and use an early pick on the remaining position.

I just don't see any way we'd trot out an OL in 2024 where our LT, RT, and the C have a combined one year of NFL experience.

Given Chuks will be gone and Moore can't play RT (wasn't he drafted with swing tackle in mind?) I'd lean to a veteran C in FA and use the 1st or 2nd round pick on a RT who could start day one.
I wasn’t trying to imply those positions would necessarily be starters right away. Moore will likely be back and possibly extended. Dan and Jones would be the starters at tackle, with a draft pick backing them up. If a center is drafted in the first or second then perhaps he starts but the Steelers always plug the holes in free agency just in case.

Starting to get the feeling that the draft goes DL, CB, OT, OC in some order with the first four picks.
You could be right. Safety is a glaring need, as well. Don't be surprised if we take one in the first.



User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8178
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:35 pm

So he was apparently benched for saying what we all feel.

Better to take knees the rest of the way in the Jax game rather than run the same plays over and over.

Within earshot of Tomlin.

So instead of taking those words to heart, Tomlin benched him.

That sounds about right…
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Smashmouth21
Posts: 1126
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:03 am

Post by Smashmouth21 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:37 pm

jeemie wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:35 pm
So he was apparently benched for saying what we all feel.

Better to take knees the rest of the way in the Jax game rather than run the same plays over and over.

Within earshot of Tomlin.

So instead of taking those words to heart, Tomlin benched him.

That sounds about right…
You don’t want quitters on your team. Period. You also want to get your first round pick on the field. Truth or pretext, either way sounds like the right call to me.

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8178
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:40 pm

Smashmouth21 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:37 pm
jeemie wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:35 pm
So he was apparently benched for saying what we all feel.

Better to take knees the rest of the way in the Jax game rather than run the same plays over and over.

Within earshot of Tomlin.

So instead of taking those words to heart, Tomlin benched him.

That sounds about right…
You don’t want quitters on your team. Period. You also want to get your first round pick on the field. Truth or pretext, either way sounds like the right call to me.
Oh no doubt I think we proved Chuks should be on the bench.

But those weren’t the words of a quitter.

Those were the words of a frustrated player who questioned authority within authority’s earshot.

Multiple ways that could be handled without benching him.

Especially when the results bear out what he said.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Deebo
Posts: 2519
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:22 pm

Post by Deebo » Fri Nov 10, 2023 8:25 pm

Smashmouth21 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:37 pm
jeemie wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:35 pm
So he was apparently benched for saying what we all feel.

Better to take knees the rest of the way in the Jax game rather than run the same plays over and over.

Within earshot of Tomlin.

So instead of taking those words to heart, Tomlin benched him.

That sounds about right…
You don’t want quitters on your team. Period. You also want to get your first round pick on the field. Truth or pretext, either way sounds like the right call to me.
Can't disagree any more with this.
The means matter just as much as the results. If you want to argue that he shouldn't be questioning authority and he got punished for it, it's a fair counterpoint

But if this was just a way to get him to the bench, then it's a silly way to arrive at that conclusion. It should be performance based and anyone could see that Jones is the best Tackle on the team.

What message does that send to Jones: the only way you get to start is if someone runs their mouth and not based on my OWN performance? That's asinine

Smashmouth21
Posts: 1126
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:03 am

Post by Smashmouth21 » Fri Nov 10, 2023 8:43 pm

Deebo wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 8:25 pm
Smashmouth21 wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:37 pm
jeemie wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 7:35 pm
So he was apparently benched for saying what we all feel.

Better to take knees the rest of the way in the Jax game rather than run the same plays over and over.

Within earshot of Tomlin.

So instead of taking those words to heart, Tomlin benched him.

That sounds about right…
You don’t want quitters on your team. Period. You also want to get your first round pick on the field. Truth or pretext, either way sounds like the right call to me.
Can't disagree any more with this.
The means matter just as much as the results. If you want to argue that he shouldn't be questioning authority and he got punished for it, it's a fair counterpoint

But if this was just a way to get him to the bench, then it's a silly way to arrive at that conclusion. It should be performance based and anyone could see that Jones is the best Tackle on the team.

What message does that send to Jones: the only way you get to start is if someone runs their mouth and not based on my OWN performance? That's asinine
I think we are in agreement. I’m just saying it’s the right call. Some have speculated it’s pretext. We will never know.

stillthere
Posts: 8537
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am

Post by stillthere » Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:12 pm

Jobu wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:08 pm
AirRescueFF wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 4:23 pm
Dulac says outburst was about the same run plays being called.
And Dejan said it was because Chuks openly expressed that the Steelers should kneel out the final minute or so in the loss to the Jags.
https://dkpittsburghsports.com/2023/11/ ... lin-nfl-dk
Well, it shouldn't: Okorafor's a good player, a good teammate, a good guy. Who, I'm told by multiple locker-room sources, made a mistake near the end of the 20-10 loss to the Jaguars at Acrisure Stadium in remarking, apparently within earshot of Tomlin, that the offense should simply kneel out the remainder of the clock rather than continuing to run plays.
I heard DK mention this and Ramon Foster added that if you are not putting your hand in the pile to help win that you don't have a place in the locker room. What did Tomlin used to say about AB? I will deal with it until I have to replace you.

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 30406
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:27 pm

Hey, their head coach set the tone by quitting in not one, but two playoff games. Versus Cleveland he chose to punt from the opponent's side of the 50 and also on 4th and 1 near midfield. He did something similar in the second half vs Jacksonville.

That to me is worse than being frustrated and saying they should take a knee.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

Jizz Mop
Posts: 8780
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:44 pm

Post by Jizz Mop » Fri Nov 10, 2023 10:21 pm

Tomlin is a cunt

I realize “cunt” is a trademark of KC

I hope he is ok w my usage

User avatar
franco32
Posts: 4717
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 2:02 am

Post by franco32 » Sat Nov 11, 2023 1:59 am

The bigger problem is that Chuks should have been replaced a long time ago. He's a JAG who is terrible at run blocking. Yet we paid the man. He'd be a great backup in the league but shouldn't start.

Can we have more shitty players talk about kneeling?

User avatar
RemoAZ
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:56 am

Post by RemoAZ » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:42 am

Opposing defense calling out the plays the last few years. Many media people calling out the coaching. Former players saying the offensive concepts are too "basic" and same plays are run over and over. Last year Muth said they can't audible. This year a starter says they should just kneel rather than run the same shitty plays. Another player that was on the team during preseason pointing out how much more complex and detailed the Green Bay and Buffalo playbooks are. How big does this story have to get before the Rooney's have to do something to save face?
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked Griffith, “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”

User avatar
ol skool
Posts: 341
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:10 pm

Post by ol skool » Sat Nov 11, 2023 3:55 am

RemoAZ wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:42 am
Opposing defense calling out the plays the last few years. Many media people calling out the coaching. Former players saying the offensive concepts are too "basic" and same plays are run over and over. Last year Muth said they can't audible. This year a starter says they should just kneel rather than run the same shitty plays. Another player that was on the team during preseason pointing out how much more complex and detailed the Green Bay and Buffalo playbooks are. How big does this story have to get before the Rooney's have to do something to save face?
Let this put to rest the claim I heard (here and elsewhere) that Canada’s system is predicated on Brian Daboll’s offense in Buffalo.

https://steelersdepot.com/2023/11/forme ... o-packers/

User avatar
RemoAZ
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:56 am

Post by RemoAZ » Sat Nov 11, 2023 4:03 am

ol skool wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 3:55 am
RemoAZ wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:42 am
Opposing defense calling out the plays the last few years. Many media people calling out the coaching. Former players saying the offensive concepts are too "basic" and same plays are run over and over. Last year Muth said they can't audible. This year a starter says they should just kneel rather than run the same shitty plays. Another player that was on the team during preseason pointing out how much more complex and detailed the Green Bay and Buffalo playbooks are. How big does this story have to get before the Rooney's have to do something to save face?
Let this put to rest the claim I heard (here and elsewhere) that Canada’s system is predicated on Brian Daboll’s offense in Buffalo.

https://steelersdepot.com/2023/11/forme ... o-packers/
Yeah that's the latest article I read. Crazy how Tomlin continues to allow his team to run an offense anyone with any kind of legitimate knowledge says is far inferior to a real NFL offense.
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked Griffith, “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:44 am

I suspect Chuks comments aren’t genuinely the driving force here. Just convenient in that they provide a reason on the surface
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

Mick
Posts: 2684
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:35 pm

Post by Mick » Sat Nov 11, 2023 1:33 pm

I mean if you want your players to have any trade value, publicizing that you are benching them because they are terrible at football seems a bad idea.

Mick
Posts: 2684
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:35 pm

Post by Mick » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:04 pm

Midseason coverage data update.

https://twitter.com/arjunmenon100/statu ... 01/photo/1

So the steelers are still the worst offense in the league at creating open receivers, but not by a big margin anymore. Probably DJ getting open now that he’s healthy is helping.

But to be fair to canada, we’ve played like 4 of the top 5 coverage teams and only 1 team in the bottom 16.

User avatar
tbsteel
Posts: 10262
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:19 pm

Post by tbsteel » Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:04 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:44 am
I suspect Chuks comments aren’t genuinely the driving force here. Just convenient in that they provide a reason on the surface
.

This whole thing is so silly. Would it kill Tomlin to just come out and admit the truth?

"Look gang, we traded up to draft Broderick Jones in the top 15 of the draft. He's a better athlete and a better football player than Chuks, we need to get him on the field, and since Dan Moore can't play on the right side, what makes the most sense for us is putting Broderick at right tackle. We need our best 5 on the field, and Chuks isn't better than Broderick."
*reserves the right to roots for losses*

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:16 pm

tbsteel wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:04 pm
SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:44 am
I suspect Chuks comments aren’t genuinely the driving force here. Just convenient in that they provide a reason on the surface
.

This whole thing is so silly. Would it kill Tomlin to just come out and admit the truth?

"Look gang, we traded up to draft Broderick Jones in the top 15 of the draft. He's a better athlete and a better football player than Chuks, we need to get him on the field, and since Dan Moore can't play on the right side, what makes the most sense for us is putting Broderick at right tackle. We need our best 5 on the field, and Chuks isn't better than Broderick."
Fair point. I do think teams and especially the Steelers have culture of vet starters getting every opportunity to keep their job

The trade value idea might have some merit too


In the end if Chuks wasn’t on thin ice starter wise I’d have a hard time believing something said in game would be a huge issue
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

stillthere
Posts: 8537
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am

Post by stillthere » Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:47 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:16 pm
In the end if Chuks wasn’t on thin ice starter wise I’d have a hard time believing something said in game would be a huge issue
Down 10 with 30seconds I could understand kneeling it out or desiring to do so. Down 10 with 2 minutes to go I cannot agree with the idea ever.

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:33 pm

stillthere wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:47 pm
SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:16 pm
In the end if Chuks wasn’t on thin ice starter wise I’d have a hard time believing something said in game would be a huge issue
Down 10 with 30seconds I could understand kneeling it out or desiring to do so. Down 10 with 2 minutes to go I cannot agree with the idea ever.
Yeah I agree. And I agree he should be dealt with

If he was playing well no way he gets benched for it
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
tbsteel
Posts: 10262
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:19 pm

Post by tbsteel » Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:24 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:33 pm

If he was playing well no way he gets benched for it
.
*reserves the right to roots for losses*

User avatar
RemoAZ
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:56 am

Post by RemoAZ » Sun Nov 12, 2023 12:53 am

stillthere wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:47 pm
SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:16 pm
In the end if Chuks wasn’t on thin ice starter wise I’d have a hard time believing something said in game would be a huge issue
Down 10 with 30seconds I could understand kneeling it out or desiring to do so. Down 10 with 2 minutes to go I cannot agree with the idea ever.
The point wasn't that he thought they should quit. He thought kneeling would be about as effective as the shit they were running.
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked Griffith, “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”

stillthere
Posts: 8537
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:37 am

Post by stillthere » Sun Nov 12, 2023 1:31 am

RemoAZ wrote:
Sun Nov 12, 2023 12:53 am
stillthere wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:47 pm
SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:16 pm
In the end if Chuks wasn’t on thin ice starter wise I’d have a hard time believing something said in game would be a huge issue
Down 10 with 30seconds I could understand kneeling it out or desiring to do so. Down 10 with 2 minutes to go I cannot agree with the idea ever.
The point wasn't that he thought they should quit. He thought kneeling would be about as effective as the shit they were running.
Maye he should jump into coaching. Move on with his life's work for about 13 million less dollars a year.

User avatar
955876
Posts: 7064
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:30 pm

The trade value idea might have some merit too
But hasn't the trade deadline already passed?

And come offseason, there is a pretty good chance Chuks gets cut given his contract and the fact he has lost his job.

So doubt there is going to be any real trade interest.

User avatar
StillerInCT
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:45 pm

Post by StillerInCT » Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:42 pm

Orangesteel wrote:
Fri Nov 03, 2023 5:04 am
Broderick Jones is a mover. It was a great pick. Guy is gonna be real good for a long time.
I'm really excited for Jones's final form
"Work harder not smarter" - Mike Tomlin

R_S
Posts: 6623
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Mon Nov 13, 2023 12:59 am

bradshaw2ben wrote:
Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:27 pm
Hey, their head coach set the tone by quitting in not one, but two playoff games. Versus Cleveland he chose to punt from the opponent's side of the 50 and also on 4th and 1 near midfield. He did something similar in the second half vs Jacksonville.

That to me is worse than being frustrated and saying they should take a knee.
A fucking men!

User avatar
DP39
Posts: 2437
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:57 pm

Post by DP39 » Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:49 pm

955876 wrote:
Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:30 pm
The trade value idea might have some merit too
But hasn't the trade deadline already passed?

And come offseason, there is a pretty good chance Chuks gets cut given his contract and the fact he has lost his job.

So doubt there is going to be any real trade interest.
Yep. It isn't about trade value. It's all about MT not messing with another mans money. He won't do it -- even to the detriment of the team. He won't verbally "devalue" Chuks, all so he has a better chance of earning money -- even if it happen to be on another team.

When was the last time you heard MT seriously put down any players overall play ability (other than the rare, generic JV/below the line comment)? Doesn't really happen. Hell, he spends the first 5-10 minutes of every Tuesday presser basically blowing every playing (even the below average ones) of the upcoming opponent.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic