955876 wrote:You seem think everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as it matches yours. That's not OK
So you are saying that Nick is a liberal democrat then? Got it..![]()
I digress...
Haha.
955876 wrote:You seem think everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as it matches yours. That's not OK
So you are saying that Nick is a liberal democrat then? Got it..![]()
I digress...
955876 wrote:You seem think everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as it matches yours. That's not OK
So you are saying that Nick is a liberal democrat then? Got it..![]()
I digress...
Nick79 wrote:The thing is, if they'd leave him the fuck alone, let him smoke his weed and play ball at the same time, we'd continue to see the fantastic play he's been putting up the last two years. It's more the NFL and their boner playing police agency than it is him. He hasn't hurt anybody, others hurt him.
THAT's THE TRUTH!
955876 wrote:You seem think everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as it matches yours. That's not OK
So you are saying that Nick is a liberal democrat then? Got it..![]()
I digress...
955876 wrote:You seem think everyone is entitled to their opinion as long as it matches yours. That's not OK
So you are saying that Nick is a liberal democrat then? Got it..![]()
I digress...
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
And months, possibly even years before that. Every time this subject comes up, you repeat the same things over and over and over again, insisting it's your opinion and you're right to have it, while simultaneously knocking down anyone who dares have an opposing viewpoint.
Old School Steeler wrote: MB is useless to us now and if he can't manage his addiction he'll be useless to himself.
Naelae wrote:Nick79 wrote:The thing is, if they'd leave him the fuck alone, let him smoke his weed and play ball at the same time, we'd continue to see the fantastic play he's been putting up the last two years. It's more the NFL and their boner playing police agency than it is him. He hasn't hurt anybody, others hurt him.
THAT's THE TRUTH!
Yeah let's just ignore the law and every other rule so you can enjoy some thug football on Sunday's. So you think the only rule he will ever have problem following is the one that says he can't smoke marijuana ? You are incredibly naive and stupid. If Bryant ever plays another down for this team it will be a miracle, and rightfully so. He had multiple chances and still screwed up. That's not someone you can depend on for anything
Nick79 wrote:Louis Lipps Service wrote:
And months, possibly even years before that. Every time this subject comes up, you repeat the same things over and over and over again, insisting it's your opinion and you're right to have it, while simultaneously knocking down anyone who dares have an opposing viewpoint.
And every time this subject comes up, others repeat the same things over and over and over again, like 'that's just how it is', 'it was his responsibility', 'it's the NFL policy, like it or not', and on and on, I'm not doing anything different from what they are doing.
Nick79 wrote:Naelae wrote:Nick79 wrote:The thing is, if they'd leave him the fuck alone, let him smoke his weed and play ball at the same time, we'd continue to see the fantastic play he's been putting up the last two years. It's more the NFL and their boner playing police agency than it is him. He hasn't hurt anybody, others hurt him.
THAT's THE TRUTH!
Yeah let's just ignore the law and every other rule so you can enjoy some thug football on Sunday's. So you think the only rule he will ever have problem following is the one that says he can't smoke marijuana ? You are incredibly naive and stupid. If Bryant ever plays another down for this team it will be a miracle, and rightfully so. He had multiple chances and still screwed up. That's not someone you can depend on for anything
LOL, you're a fucking retard! Of course "we can't depend on him now", it's not because he isn't capable, it' s because the NFL is beating him down. he could play the 2016 season, smoking weed 5 days a week, and he'd catch 80 balls, 1500 yards and 10 TDs. We could depend on him and he'd deliver if the NFL wasn't beating him down, and YES, FUCK YOU RETARD, I'm RIGHT, this NFL bullshit, is SPECIFIC to the NFL, the other sports aren't doing stuff like this.
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Retard?
Wow, way to show your maturity.
Spend some time around people with disabilities.
You're a waste of life.
Nick79 wrote:Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Retard?
Wow, way to show your maturity.
Spend some time around people with disabilities.
You're a waste of life.
I enjoy using politically incorrect words. I do it on purpose. That's OK, I get a lot of personal attacks against me all the time, just for voicing valid opinions, toughen up, take it, embrace it like I do.
Louis Lipps Service wrote:Nick79 wrote:Louis Lipps Service wrote:
And months, possibly even years before that. Every time this subject comes up, you repeat the same things over and over and over again, insisting it's your opinion and you're right to have it, while simultaneously knocking down anyone who dares have an opposing viewpoint.
And every time this subject comes up, others repeat the same things over and over and over again, like 'that's just how it is', 'it was his responsibility', 'it's the NFL policy, like it or not', and on and on, I'm not doing anything different from what they are doing.
They say it once or twice and move on from the subject. You berate the point over and over and over again, making it a point to respond to every single person in the thread who doesn't agree with you. No one else does that.
Louis Lipps Service wrote:Nick79 wrote:Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Retard?
Wow, way to show your maturity.
Spend some time around people with disabilities.
You're a waste of life.
I enjoy using politically incorrect words. I do it on purpose. That's OK, I get a lot of personal attacks against me all the time, just for voicing valid opinions, toughen up, take it, embrace it like I do.
So you're a troll. Got it.
Nick79 wrote:Louis Lipps Service wrote:Nick79 wrote:I enjoy using politically incorrect words. I do it on purpose. That's OK, I get a lot of personal attacks against me all the time, just for voicing valid opinions, toughen up, take it, embrace it like I do.
So you're a troll. Got it.
What? how does using unPC words make you a troll, are you saying you can't use those words and if you do it's trolling? What if you just feel you have the right to not follow PC language sensoring?
Nick79 wrote: Who decides when I have to quit? I know it's not you, you are not some sort of authority here. I'm even backing up my assertions with actual data, and it still seems to bother you?
I would further state that if your workforce is always high, regardless of when, it's possible that your product will be reduced in quality. Get high before a game? Sure!!!! Get high before speaking to the press? No problem!!!! Get high while doing community service and child services? Why the fuck not? We don't care that 10 year olds are being coached by a guy who doesn't know where the goal line is and reeks of pot, hacking away. Culturally condition kids to think smoking pot while making $10 mil a year is standard practice. See where this is going?Poltargyst wrote:I think most if not all of us think the NFL should not be testing for weed. I think we can all agree, though, that no matter how stupid they may be, your employer has rules and if you want to stay employed you follow the rules. If your employer insists that you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work, then you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work.
People seem to agree on both points, so I'm not sure where the argument is.
COR-TEN wrote:... We don't care that 10 year olds are being coached by a guy who doesn't know where the goal line is and reeks of pot, hacking away. Culturally condition kids to think smoking pot while making $10 mil a year is standard practice. See where this is going?
COR-TEN wrote:...As a business, there needs to be a line somewhere.
Poltargyst wrote:I think most if not all of us think the NFL should not be testing for weed. I think we can all agree, though, that no matter how stupid they may be, your employer has rules and if you want to stay employed you follow the rules. If your employer insists that you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work, then you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work.
People seem to agree on both points, so I'm not sure where the argument is.
Stosh-67 wrote:Poltargyst wrote:I think most if not all of us think the NFL should not be testing for weed. I think we can all agree, though, that no matter how stupid they may be, your employer has rules and if you want to stay employed you follow the rules. If your employer insists that you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work, then you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work.
People seem to agree on both points, so I'm not sure where the argument is.
well put.
sums it up.
end thread.
If my employer asked me to wear fuzzy slippers to work, I'd level a lawsuit.Stosh-67 wrote:Poltargyst wrote:I think most if not all of us think the NFL should not be testing for weed. I think we can all agree, though, that no matter how stupid they may be, your employer has rules and if you want to stay employed you follow the rules. If your employer insists that you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work, then you wear fuzzy bunny slippers to work.
People seem to agree on both points, so I'm not sure where the argument is.
well put.
sums it up.
end thread.
Louis Lipps Service wrote:
Most agree that the NFL rule is messed up. If you had an ounce of intelligence, you'd see that.
What people are arguing is that Bryant still needs to adhere by those rules, whether they're agreeable or not.
Louis Lipps Service wrote:Your "data" does absolutely nothing to argue that point one way or another. So get the hell out of here with your "data".
Louis Lipps Service wrote: Right. And hence my issue with Nick. He's creating arguments out of nothing but his sheer desire for attention and self-admitted trolling.
Nick79 wrote:Louis Lipps Service wrote:Your "data" does absolutely nothing to argue that point one way or another. So get the hell out of here with your "data".
You obviously didn't look at it closely. It clearly, CLEARLY shows that the NFL vs. NBA and vs. MLB, has more suspensions for drug use in the last 2-3-4 years than the other sports do in their entire history. That was the point I wanted to make, and those links, if you look at them closely ABSOLUTELY DO MAKE THAT POINT. Probably within the LAST YEAR ALONE, the NFL has suspended more players than the NBA has in their entire history. Go look and actually read it.
BarryFoster wrote:Sorry I started this thread