Tomlin Tuesday Presser

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 30390
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Tomlin Tuesday Presser

Post by bradshaw2ben » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:55 pm

I like that the supposed medical expert and MD doesn't know what a compound fracture is.


“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2691
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:15 pm

StillMadAtSlobber wrote:
Steelafan77 wrote:Ike had a plate surgically implanted in his arm. What exactly are the details of that? A Plate? I kinda expected a pin but...
The details are ... read the link in the 1st page from Steeler Depot.

Meh... I'll pass.....

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8173
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:42 pm

The Pierogi wrote:
fortythree wrote:It was relevant because of the current issues in the NFL.

Tomlin completely whiffed on the question too.


I guess it's relevant if someone really believes the NFL is going to start suspending guys seven years after the fact.

Maybe they can ask about Jerome Bettis getting a beej at St. Vincent next Tuesday.


It's relevant because Art Rooney is the co-leader of the investigation as to how seriously the NFL took domestic violence issues.

Yes- it happened seven years ago, and it's kinda unfair to be brought up now, but, as they say in politics, it's "bad optics".

The NFL turned this into a shitshow. I personally think the whole thing is sound and fury, but this is the path the NFL chose to go down, so they are going to suffer the consequences for it.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

User avatar
jebrick
Posts: 3019
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 5:59 pm

Post by jebrick » Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:44 pm

Jeemie wrote:
The Pierogi wrote:
fortythree wrote:It was relevant because of the current issues in the NFL.

Tomlin completely whiffed on the question too.


I guess it's relevant if someone really believes the NFL is going to start suspending guys seven years after the fact.

Maybe they can ask about Jerome Bettis getting a beej at St. Vincent next Tuesday.


It's relevant because Art Rooney is the co-leader of the investigation as to how seriously the NFL took domestic violence issues.

Yes- it happened seven years ago, and it's kinda unfair to be brought up now, but, as they say in politics, it's "bad optics".

The NFL turned this into a shitshow. I personally think the whole thing is sound and fury, but this is the path the NFL chose to go down, so they are going to suffer the consequences for it.


Good article on BSPN by Gregg Eastbrook on why the NFL is getting all this grief. Basically, they used up all of their goodwill.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8173
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:00 pm

jebrick wrote:Good article on BSPN by Gregg Eastbrook on why the NFL is getting all this grief. Basically, they used up all of their goodwill.


I agree with both premises.

The NFL has no goodwill, and the NFL is receiving a lot of misdirected anger.

But because owners are arrogant pricks who have long stopped trying to establish a long-term fanbase but instead are going for maximum profit now...I don't weep for them.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:04 pm

R S wrote:
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Iron_City wrote:My early thoughts are Ike played his last snap with the Steelers and probably in the NFL

I 100% disagree with you


what was said that makes you think that , IC?


He's just at age where shit hurts more and takes longer to heal. Not to mention it takes longer to get your legs back and shake off 10 weeks worth of rust at that age too.

Also, my opinion is this was his last year anyhow. I think Cortez Allen and Bill Gay can be capable starters.

I'm an Ike fan, always have been. I just think he punched his ticket. He may get some PT later in the year, just not hanging my hat on it

FortyThree
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:00 am

Post by FortyThree » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:05 pm

SP wrote:
fortythree wrote:It was relevant because of the current issues in the NFL.

Tomlin completely whiffed on the question too.


I just hope the next time an ESPN reporter asks one of these questions to any NFL personnel, they turn the tables and asks about how they feel working for an organization that employs a guy in Ray Lewis who was convicted of obstructing justice in a double murder trial. Or Jay Mariotti being arrested for domestic violence. Or Chris Berman, Erik Kusileas, Sean Salisbury and Mike Tirico all sexually harrassing co-workers. Or Stewart Scott having an affair with a co-worker. Or Doug Gotleib being a convicted credit card thief.


An excellent point. The Ray Lewis thing is definitely one ESPN should answer. But they're not real journalists anyway.

Tomlin answer they question just fine. He should have came firing back stronger at the person asking the dumb question though.


He really didn't though. He kinda, sorta blamed Harrison's girlfriend for the issue. Then again his response was nothing compared to the Chairman of the entire fucking franchise basically applauding Harrison for hitting her.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:09 pm

forty three is in the media. He thinks everyone owes him an answer

Journalism is nothing more than shock value. If you dig up a video of James Harrison hitting his ex you'll get the same response. As it stands, a clear picture isn't painted so its a "he said she said" thing

Ray Lewis served his time in my book and paid for his sins. No reason to bring it back up. When Ray Rice serves his time, I'll feel the same way

FortyThree
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:00 am

Post by FortyThree » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:15 pm

jebrick wrote:Good article on BSPN by Gregg Eastbrook


This is the first time in history anyone has said this.

FortyThree
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:00 am

Post by FortyThree » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:19 pm

Iron_City wrote:forty three is in the media. He thinks everyone owes him an answer


Was.

I don't think anyone owes me anything. But the reporters who go there have jobs to do and those jobs involve writing shit about football, the business of the NFL, etc. They aren't owed an answer any more than you or me but if there's a media availability then the media have the right to ask the questions they see fit.

Sometimes questions are really fucking stupid. See any question John Shumway ever asked anyone. Sometimes, like the question about Harrison, it's relevant to a much broader issue than the on-field product.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:22 pm

fortythree wrote:
Iron_City wrote:forty three is in the media. He thinks everyone owes him an answer


Was.

I don't think anyone owes me anything. But the reporters who go there have jobs to do and those jobs involve writing shit about football, the business of the NFL, etc. They aren't owed an answer any more than you or me but if there's a media availability then the media have the right to ask the questions they see fit.

Sometimes questions are really fucking stupid. See any question John Shumway ever asked anyone. Sometimes, like the question about Harrison, it's relevant to a much broader issue than the on-field product.


As you stated, having the right to ask a question isn't the same as being owed an answer. So why judge on the answers they give? They obviously don't think its any of their business or aren't going to get trapped behind a statement.

They only go to that podium because they're contractually obligated. Not because any of those reporters are worth a rats ass

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8173
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:23 pm

fortythree wrote:An excellent point. The Ray Lewis thing is definitely one ESPN should answer. But they're not real journalists anyway.


I loved Ray Lewis' comments on ESPN last night as to how there are "some things you can cover up, and some things you can't".

That was priceless.

I could hear ESPN execs' brains explode up in Bristol all the way down here in Philadelphia.

:lol: :lol:
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

User avatar
955876
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:24 pm

Not to mention it takes longer to get your legs back


He broke his arm not his leg.

No reason he can't be doing lots of running while his wing heals.

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8173
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:25 pm

Iron_City wrote:As you stated, having the right to ask a question isn't the same as being owed an answer. So why judge on the answers they give? They obviously don't think its any of their business or aren't going to get trapped behind a statement.

They only go to that podium because they're contractually obligated. Not because any of those reporters are worth a rats ass


We can't judge the answers because we aren't owed any answers?

What kind of logic is that.

Forty Three wasn't claiming Tomlin and Rooney owed the press any answers. He said the answers they gave were shit and, again, as they say in politics, really bad optics.

They were terrible answers, and indeed, could be read as pretty much blaming Harrison's girlfriend for the entire incident.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:44 pm

fortythree wrote:
jebrick wrote:Good article on BSPN by Gregg Eastbrook


This is the first time in history anyone has said this.


:lol:

Greggggggggggggggggggggg.

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:22 pm

fortythree wrote:
He really didn't though. He kinda, sorta blamed Harrison's girlfriend for the issue. Then again his response was nothing compared to the Chairman of the entire fucking franchise basically applauding Harrison for hitting her.

I didn't get that impression at all. It seems he said Harrison has evolved and matured, and his relationship with his "woman" has done the same. They are after all, still together I think.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:34 pm

Jeemie wrote:
Iron_City wrote:As you stated, having the right to ask a question isn't the same as being owed an answer. So why judge on the answers they give? They obviously don't think its any of their business or aren't going to get trapped behind a statement.

They only go to that podium because they're contractually obligated. Not because any of those reporters are worth a rats ass


We can't judge the answers because we aren't owed any answers?

What kind of logic is that.

Forty Three wasn't claiming Tomlin and Rooney owed the press any answers. He said the answers they gave were shit and, again, as they say in politics, really bad optics.

They were terrible answers, and indeed, could be read as pretty much blaming Harrison's girlfriend for the entire incident.


why judge an answer when someone is only giving you half truths because you're a schmuck?

Like this one

User avatar
Nick79
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:54 pm

Post by Nick79 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:56 pm

Iron_City wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
Iron_City wrote:As you stated, having the right to ask a question isn't the same as being owed an answer. So why judge on the answers they give? They obviously don't think its any of their business or aren't going to get trapped behind a statement.

They only go to that podium because they're contractually obligated. Not because any of those reporters are worth a rats ass


We can't judge the answers because we aren't owed any answers?

What kind of logic is that.

Forty Three wasn't claiming Tomlin and Rooney owed the press any answers. He said the answers they gave were shit and, again, as they say in politics, really bad optics.

They were terrible answers, and indeed, could be read as pretty much blaming Harrison's girlfriend for the entire incident.


why judge an answer when someone is only giving you half truths because you're a schmuck?

Like this one

A "schmuck"? Honestly, can't you refrain from name calling? Is it that hard to be polite with your fellow Steelers fans?

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:07 pm

Nick79 wrote: A "schmuck"? Honestly, can't you refrain from name calling? Is it that hard to be polite with your fellow Steelers fans?



Image

User avatar
Nick79
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:54 pm

Post by Nick79 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:13 pm

Iron_City wrote:
Nick79 wrote: A "schmuck"? Honestly, can't you refrain from name calling? Is it that hard to be polite with your fellow Steelers fans?



Image


Is that what you get when you breed Dr. Phil with the Michelin man?

Fury
Posts: 637
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:48 pm

Post by Fury » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:38 pm

Can we knock this stupid bullshit off? Who gives a fuck?

User avatar
Obviously
Posts: 8120
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:03 pm

Post by Obviously » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:59 pm

Fury wrote:Can we knock this stupid bullshit off? Who gives a fuck?
#NoMoTomlin

User avatar
Nick79
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:54 pm

Post by Nick79 » Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:13 pm

Fury wrote:Can we knock this stupid bullshit off? Who gives a fuck?


OK, I totally agree. Let's see if this stops anyone else, but I'm in.

Old School Steeler
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 11:59 am

Post by Old School Steeler » Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:57 am

Jeemie wrote:
fortythree wrote:An excellent point. The Ray Lewis thing is definitely one ESPN should answer. But they're not real journalists anyway.


I loved Ray Lewis' comments on ESPN last night as to how there are "some things you can cover up, and some things you can't".

That was priceless.

I could hear ESPN execs' brains explode up in Bristol all the way down here in Philadelphia.

:lol: :lol:


Not as loud as the Universal Harry Potter explosions over the release of Emma's porn shots.

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 8173
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:40 am

Old School Steeler wrote:
Jeemie wrote:
fortythree wrote:An excellent point. The Ray Lewis thing is definitely one ESPN should answer. But they're not real journalists anyway.


I loved Ray Lewis' comments on ESPN last night as to how there are "some things you can cover up, and some things you can't".

That was priceless.

I could hear ESPN execs' brains explode up in Bristol all the way down here in Philadelphia.

:lol: :lol:


Not as loud as the Universal Harry Potter explosions over the release of Emma's porn shots.


They've been released?

I thought that was just a threat.

PS just checked- they are launching...something...in 18 minutes.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

Gonzo
Posts: 1911
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:23 am

Post by Gonzo » Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:28 am

Jeemie wrote:
jebrick wrote:Good article on BSPN by Gregg Eastbrook on why the NFL is getting all this grief. Basically, they used up all of their goodwill.


I agree with both premises.

The NFL has no goodwill, and the NFL is receiving a lot of misdirected anger.

But because owners are arrogant pricks who have long stopped trying to establish a long-term fanbase but instead are going for maximum profit now...I don't weep for them.


I think Easterbrook is still exaggerating the relevance or importance of anything some NFL dope does as it related to general social issues.
Although, I do agree about the NFL pissing away Goodwill (but for different reasons) and that is how Roger has failed and why I do not like the comments that -- well he has increased profits. He is a beneficiary of past actions and he and his taskmasters are screwing ir up IMHO. I like the below article as well as the Deadspin piece more than Easterbrooks

http://thefieldsofgreen.com/2014/09/03/ ... 0bgEXhg%3D

FortyThree
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:00 am

Post by FortyThree » Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:58 pm

Iron_City wrote:
fortythree wrote:
Iron_City wrote:forty three is in the media. He thinks everyone owes him an answer


Was.

I don't think anyone owes me anything. But the reporters who go there have jobs to do and those jobs involve writing shit about football, the business of the NFL, etc. They aren't owed an answer any more than you or me but if there's a media availability then the media have the right to ask the questions they see fit.

Sometimes questions are really fucking stupid. See any question John Shumway ever asked anyone. Sometimes, like the question about Harrison, it's relevant to a much broader issue than the on-field product.


As you stated, having the right to ask a question isn't the same as being owed an answer. So why judge on the answers they give? They obviously don't think its any of their business or aren't going to get trapped behind a statement.

They only go to that podium because they're contractually obligated. Not because any of those reporters are worth a rats ass


You judge on the answer they give because their answer is what they want to be judged on. Whatever a player, coach, owner, etc. says to the media is clearly something they want to get out there so why should we not judge them on it?

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:01 pm

fortythree wrote:
You judge on the answer they give because their answer is what they want to be judged on. Whatever a player, coach, owner, etc. says to the media is clearly something they want to get out there so why should we not judge them on it?


Is that even serious? You think they want to answer all those questions so some half assed journalism major can fish for clicks?

The only answers they probably want to give is to counter all the false journalism that takes place

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:02 pm

But the problem is, those same journalists are a necessity to them. The league makes money keeping a fan based reeled in. No better way to do that than get them the information they want ASAP.

A necessary evil

FortyThree
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:00 am

Post by FortyThree » Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:15 pm

Iron_City wrote:
fortythree wrote:
You judge on the answer they give because their answer is what they want to be judged on. Whatever a player, coach, owner, etc. says to the media is clearly something they want to get out there so why should we not judge them on it?


Is that even serious? You think they want to answer all those questions so some half assed journalism major can fish for clicks?

The only answers they probably want to give is to counter all the false journalism that takes place


It doesn't matter if they want to or not. They still have an obligation to talk to the media. So when they know they're talking to the media they should only say things they want to get out. Sports media is typically nothing but PR. So they should use it like PR and say only what they want getting out. If they don't, then that's their problem, not the media's.

I get that you hate the media but your act is tiresome. You are wrong in this instance, and that's okay.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic