Bell Is Back. Who Goes?
-
steelmann58
- Posts: 5828
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:38 pm
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
Martavis Bryant so he can smoke all the reefer he wants
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
stealforlife wrote:Martavis Bryant so he can smoke all the reefer he wants
I'd like to see him play some more myself.
-
StillMadAtSlobber
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:33 pm
- Location: Houston
The Pierogi wrote:Jeemie wrote:The Pierogi wrote:I put unrealized potential in quotes for a reason. They compared him to Jamaal Charles when he was drafted, then used him like he was Stefan Logan.
Because he didn't prove he could do anything else.
And I think it was McCluster they compared him to, not Charles.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000357692/article/dri-archer-drawing-comparisons-to-jamaal-charlesThe runner out of Kent State "has been tagged internally as a miniature version of Jamaal Charles" in Todd Haley's offense, per Breer.
That is really scary. Too think that someone in the FO would favorable compare Archer to Charles. That shows a devastating level of ineptitude.
Mike Tomlin: Bringing mediocrity to the 'Burgh for over a decade.
-
StillMadAtSlobber
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:33 pm
- Location: Houston
The Pierogi wrote:I'll be disappointed if it's Archer because of the draft pick investment and "unrealized potential" but not surprised. Giving a 3rd-round pick less than 20 games to pan out isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of the front office.
I disagree, its actually the opposite:
The non-ringing endorsement of the FO was when they picked him on Day 1.
The non-ringing endorsement of the FO continued with the blind refusal to not admit the mistake and cut him.
Cutting him is the first positive for the FO in the Dri Archer experiment.
Mike Tomlin: Bringing mediocrity to the 'Burgh for over a decade.
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
Hopefully it's Nix or Lyons.
-
bradshaw2ben
- Site Admin
- Posts: 30407
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
pitty smitty wrote:Hopefully it's Nix or Lyons.
I completely disagree. I like both players as assets for this team
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
Dri JJ Handoff Monkey.....got to be one of those
Anybody else and I will be pissed
Anybody else and I will be pissed
bradshaw2ben wrote:well said
Should be Archer. Probably will be Todman, under the last-in, first out policy. Dark horse: Cashaud Lyons.
It's a shame that they will keep Archer, he's really useless, I wish they could just admit mistakes and move on.
stealforlife wrote:Martavis Bryant so he can smoke all the reefer he wants
Really? Are you an idiot or a Ratbirds fan? Or maybe Martavis banged your sister or mom or both? Why in God's name would a true Steelers fan want Martavis Bryant gone? Cripes if Bryant were playing Sunday the Steelers would have probably laid a 60-burger on the Niners.
#NoMoTomlin
-
BethlehemSteel
- Posts: 1293
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:39 pm
- Location: IGZF'S
Obviously wrote:stealforlife wrote:Martavis Bryant so he can smoke all the reefer he wants
Really? Are you an idiot or a Ratbirds fan? Or maybe Martavis banged your sister or mom or both? Why in God's name would a true Steelers fan want Martavis Bryant gone? Cripes if Bryant were playing Sunday the Steelers would have probably laid a 60-burger on the Niners.
with a handle called stealforlife, you can be certain it's a troll......Gayven or Cheatriot fan
“We Do Not Care”........"I expect guys to make routine plays routinely"
StillMadAtSlobber wrote:The Pierogi wrote:I'll be disappointed if it's Archer because of the draft pick investment and "unrealized potential" but not surprised. Giving a 3rd-round pick less than 20 games to pan out isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of the front office.
I disagree, its actually the opposite:
The non-ringing endorsement of the FO was when they picked him on Day 1.
The non-ringing endorsement of the FO continued with the blind refusal to not admit the mistake and cut him.
Cutting him is the first positive for the FO in the Dri Archer experiment.
Exactly, admitting mistakes and then correcting them is a positive.
Labriola doesn't necessarily think it's going to be someone from the RB group, but could be someone else - waived and re-signed to the practice squad. Can Archer sit on the practice squad? Why, I don't know, but it's not looking like elf on a shelf is going anywhere.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.
-
FortyThree
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:00 am
Archer is a WR.
And he's not eligible for the practice squad.
And he's not eligible for the practice squad.
-
Legacy User
- Posts: 288947
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am
Watch it be Tyler Murphy and the whole board have a simultaneous mental breakdown...
The Pierogi wrote:Watch it be Tyler Murphy and the whole board have a simultaneous mental breakdown...
If it's anyone but Archer I'll be disappointed but not mental.
If you look at it as asset control, Murphy is the logical choice...doubt anyone snaps him up off our practice squad.
But I'd like the Archer Experiment to be over...be a sign the coaches are learning from their mistakes.
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)
Seriously, how much faster is archer than Murphy? They already have two guys that can blow the top off coverage.
At least Murphy is taller than archer, and knows a bit about the qb position.
Wouldn't it be wild if they got rid of archer and laundry in one fell swoop and picked up a safety?
At least Murphy is taller than archer, and knows a bit about the qb position.
Wouldn't it be wild if they got rid of archer and laundry in one fell swoop and picked up a safety?
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.
