no trolling, no nonsense, no stupidity
a simple block, and you can cut straight to actual discussion rather than nonsense.
Starve the gorilla, just block him


FalseProfessor Half Wit wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:05 pmFriendly reminder:
When someone tells you no one has ever proved them wrong, that in no way entails that they have demonstrated that they are right.
Even though STD has been refuted with ample evidence, let him claim the contrary. What has he done to demonstrate Watt is not an elite player other than to assume without justification that his preferred standard for measuring such is the only plausible standard for such?
Answer: nothing.
Carry on
SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 2:35 pmFalseProfessor Half Wit wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:05 pmFriendly reminder:
When someone tells you no one has ever proved them wrong, that in no way entails that they have demonstrated that they are right.
Even though STD has been refuted with ample evidence, let him claim the contrary. What has he done to demonstrate Watt is not an elite player other than to assume without justification that his preferred standard for measuring such is the only plausible standard for such?
Answer: nothing.
Carry on
I am quoting you so I will agree that you are wrong on this.SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 11:38 amLolololzstillthere wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 5:02 amSo, no games are important according to that argument there. I guess that would make it difficult to show up in an important game since you say there are no important games in the NFL.
Now you’re just being obtuse
Mainly because you are incorrect on this
Yeah butRemoAZ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 4:55 pmDefensive Player of the Month
https://steelersdepot.com/2023/09/t-j-w ... the-month/
Hard to do in only 3 weeks he must be LowWattJizz Mop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 5:10 pmYeah butRemoAZ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 4:55 pmDefensive Player of the Month
https://steelersdepot.com/2023/09/t-j-w ... the-month/
STD, Is this not enough evidence for an impact player? Surely you must see the value of TJ.stillthere wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:02 pmHard to do in only 3 weeks he must be LowWattJizz Mop wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 5:10 pmYeah butRemoAZ wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 4:55 pmDefensive Player of the Month
https://steelersdepot.com/2023/09/t-j-w ... the-month/
I never said he wasn’t valuableTexas Black & Gold wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:18 pmSTD, Is this not enough evidence for an impact player? Surely you must see the value of TJ.
I dismiss your dumb standard a priori for what makes a player elite. There's no obligation to agree with you. You haven't given any reason for anyone to accept your standard: you assume without justification that your preferred standard for measuring elite players is the only plausible standard for such.SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:26 pmI never said he wasn’t valuableTexas Black & Gold wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:18 pmSTD, Is this not enough evidence for an impact player? Surely you must see the value of TJ.
He disappears in big moments
Like 0-for a career disappears
SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:26 pmI never said he wasn’t valuableTexas Black & Gold wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:18 pmSTD, Is this not enough evidence for an impact player? Surely you must see the value of TJ.
He disappears in big moments
Like 0-for a career disappears
STD is restricting impact play to "crucial moments" (real obvious what that isTexas Black & Gold wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 5:45 pm"He is probably the most impactful defensive player in the league right now," said Ryans.
Even opposing coaches realize how impactful Watt is to the league.
So why can't a "fan" recognize the same?
I think we can all agree that all plays matter.ALL plays matter in ALL games because ALL plays affect the outcome. And if one accepts all plays matter in all games,,,
I remember discussing that Browns game back when it happened. Watt didn't play poorly at all - the left side of the front 7 (Wormley/Marsh/Highsmith) were painfully bad and there were loads of blown coverages. Here's that thread: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19009&start=120W&M_Steeler wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 11:31 pmWatt played in 3 playoff games. In the first two, (Jags 2017, Browns 2020) he didn't do much, but neither did anyone else on D. Besides, he was a rookie in 2017. I ding him a bit for not doing much in the Browns game, but he more than made up for it in the Chiefs playoff game. Unfortunately, that Steelers team had no business being in the playoffs and was totally outmatched by the Chiefs. That's not TJ's fault. He rose to the occasion.
To be clear, I also deny Watt never makes crucial plays in crucial moments. I'm saying that even if you concede this nonsense to STD (which allows his position to be at its strongest), you can still dismiss him. And when the stongest reading of your argument can be dismissed, you're argument must not be very good.955876 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:42 pmI think we can all agree that all plays matter.ALL plays matter in ALL games because ALL plays affect the outcome. And if one accepts all plays matter in all games,,,
However, the founders & followers of “Crucial Plays Matter” will take offense to this. They will say that you can’t say that all plays matter because it degrades the importance & significance of claiming that crucial plays matter.
And until you accept that crucial plays matter more, it’s disrespectful and offensive to say that all plays matter.
Plus, it’s easy to scheme away a certain player's impact when you jump out to a 24-0 lead. So easy, even a special teams coach can do it!Pabst wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:53 pmI remember discussing that Browns game back when it happened. Watt didn't play poorly at all - the left side of the front 7 (Wormley/Marsh/Highsmith) were painfully bad and there were loads of blown coverages. Here's that thread: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19009&start=120W&M_Steeler wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 11:31 pmWatt played in 3 playoff games. In the first two, (Jags 2017, Browns 2020) he didn't do much, but neither did anyone else on D. Besides, he was a rookie in 2017. I ding him a bit for not doing much in the Browns game, but he more than made up for it in the Chiefs playoff game. Unfortunately, that Steelers team had no business being in the playoffs and was totally outmatched by the Chiefs. That's not TJ's fault. He rose to the occasion.
There's one play in particular where Watt beats Wyatt Teller on a bull rush only for Baker to flip it to an uncovered Nick Chubb.
Do weighty downs matter more than other plays though? Inquiring minds and all that.....955876 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:42 pmI think we can all agree that all plays matter.ALL plays matter in ALL games because ALL plays affect the outcome. And if one accepts all plays matter in all games,,,
However, the founders & followers of “Crucial Plays Matter” will take offense to this. They will say that you can’t say that all plays matter because it degrades the importance & significance of claiming that crucial plays matter.
And until you accept that crucial plays matter more, it’s disrespectful and offensive to say that all plays matter.
Weighty downs plays certainly matter. But not as much as weighty downs during crucial moments against a quality opponent in a big game matter.stillthere wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:49 pmDo weighty downs matter more than other plays though? Inquiring minds and all that.....955876 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:42 pmI think we can all agree that all plays matter.ALL plays matter in ALL games because ALL plays affect the outcome. And if one accepts all plays matter in all games,,,
However, the founders & followers of “Crucial Plays Matter” will take offense to this. They will say that you can’t say that all plays matter because it degrades the importance & significance of claiming that crucial plays matter.
And until you accept that crucial plays matter more, it’s disrespectful and offensive to say that all plays matter.
Don’t need to explain it to me. This whole argument is dumb.Professor Half Wit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:53 pmTo be clear, I also deny Watt never makes crucial plays in crucial moments. I'm saying that even if you concede this nonsense to STD (which allows his position to be at its strongest), you can still dismiss him. And when the stongest reading of your argument can be dismissed, you're argument must not be very good.955876 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:42 pmI think we can all agree that all plays matter.ALL plays matter in ALL games because ALL plays affect the outcome. And if one accepts all plays matter in all games,,,
However, the founders & followers of “Crucial Plays Matter” will take offense to this. They will say that you can’t say that all plays matter because it degrades the importance & significance of claiming that crucial plays matter.
And until you accept that crucial plays matter more, it’s disrespectful and offensive to say that all plays matter.
FalseProfessor Half Wit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:53 pmTo be clear, I also deny Watt never makes crucial plays in crucial moments. I'm saying that even if you concede this nonsense to STD (which allows his position to be at its strongest), you can still dismiss him. And when the stongest reading of your argument can be dismissed, you're argument must not be very good.955876 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:42 pmI think we can all agree that all plays matter.ALL plays matter in ALL games because ALL plays affect the outcome. And if one accepts all plays matter in all games,,,
However, the founders & followers of “Crucial Plays Matter” will take offense to this. They will say that you can’t say that all plays matter because it degrades the importance & significance of claiming that crucial plays matter.
And until you accept that crucial plays matter more, it’s disrespectful and offensive to say that all plays matter.
If declarative statements were evidence you’d be in business. Too bad.SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:24 pmFalseProfessor Half Wit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:53 pmTo be clear, I also deny Watt never makes crucial plays in crucial moments. I'm saying that even if you concede this nonsense to STD (which allows his position to be at its strongest), you can still dismiss him. And when the stongest reading of your argument can be dismissed, you're argument must not be very good.955876 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:42 pm
I think we can all agree that all plays matter.
However, the founders & followers of “Crucial Plays Matter” will take offense to this. They will say that you can’t say that all plays matter because it degrades the importance & significance of claiming that crucial plays matter.
And until you accept that crucial plays matter more, it’s disrespectful and offensive to say that all plays matter.
Jobu wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:38 pmPlus, it’s easy to scheme away a certain player's impact when you jump out to a 24-0 lead. So easy, even a special teams coach can do it!Pabst wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:53 pmI remember discussing that Browns game back when it happened. Watt didn't play poorly at all - the left side of the front 7 (Wormley/Marsh/Highsmith) were painfully bad and there were loads of blown coverages. Here's that thread: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=19009&start=120
There's one play in particular where Watt beats Wyatt Teller on a bull rush only for Baker to flip it to an uncovered Nick Chubb.
From the thread:W&M_Steeler wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:31 pmPerhaps, but let's not forget that the Defense had a significant role in letting the score get to 21-0. They gave up TD drives of 46 and a 65 yards immediately after the opening fumble debacle. Ben and the offense bear most of the responsibility for losing that game, but the Defense didn't exactly cover itself in glory either. I don't think that TJ had a bad game per se, but he was a non-entity. Disappointing. You wouldn't think such a transcendent talent could be completely schemed out of the game. I know the Steelers were playing Cassius Marsh that game, but even still they had a ton of talent on the field.
-Browns first possession- 3rd and 4. Busted coverage leads to a Landry TD. Watt was double teamed (chipped by Hunt)
- Browns' next possession features runs of 28, 27, and 11 yards for a TD. ALL 3 RUNS ARE AWAY FROM WATT.
- Browns next possession starts on the Steelers' 15 yard line. Hunt runs for an 8 yard TD.....AWAY FROM WATT.
- Next possession is a punt
- Last possession of the first half. On 2nd & 9, Watt is double teamed, and Chubb takes a screen 21 yards. Next, Hunt runs 12 yards AWAY FROM WATT. Then Cleveland scores on a blown coverage (where Watt still gets pressure on Baker).
At this point the game is 35-7.
So yeah, the reason Watt "didn't show up" in the Cleveland game was that the Browns avoided him and went straight after Highsmith/Marsh (who were awful).
FalsePabst wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:40 pmFrom the thread:W&M_Steeler wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:31 pmPerhaps, but let's not forget that the Defense had a significant role in letting the score get to 21-0. They gave up TD drives of 46 and a 65 yards immediately after the opening fumble debacle. Ben and the offense bear most of the responsibility for losing that game, but the Defense didn't exactly cover itself in glory either. I don't think that TJ had a bad game per se, but he was a non-entity. Disappointing. You wouldn't think such a transcendent talent could be completely schemed out of the game. I know the Steelers were playing Cassius Marsh that game, but even still they had a ton of talent on the field.-Browns first possession- 3rd and 4. Busted coverage leads to a Landry TD. Watt was double teamed (chipped by Hunt)
- Browns' next possession features runs of 28, 27, and 11 yards for a TD. ALL 3 RUNS ARE AWAY FROM WATT.
- Browns next possession starts on the Steelers' 15 yard line. Hunt runs for an 8 yard TD.....AWAY FROM WATT.
- Next possession is a punt
- Last possession of the first half. On 2nd & 9, Watt is double teamed, and Chubb takes a screen 21 yards. Next, Hunt runs 12 yards AWAY FROM WATT. Then Cleveland scores on a blown coverage (where Watt still gets pressure on Baker).
At this point the game is 35-7.
So yeah, the reason Watt "didn't show up" in the Cleveland game was that the Browns avoided him and went straight after Highsmith/Marsh (who were awful).
Hmm!Pabst wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:40 pmFrom the thread:W&M_Steeler wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:31 pmPerhaps, but let's not forget that the Defense had a significant role in letting the score get to 21-0. They gave up TD drives of 46 and a 65 yards immediately after the opening fumble debacle. Ben and the offense bear most of the responsibility for losing that game, but the Defense didn't exactly cover itself in glory either. I don't think that TJ had a bad game per se, but he was a non-entity. Disappointing. You wouldn't think such a transcendent talent could be completely schemed out of the game. I know the Steelers were playing Cassius Marsh that game, but even still they had a ton of talent on the field.-Browns first possession- 3rd and 4. Busted coverage leads to a Landry TD. Watt was double teamed (chipped by Hunt)
- Browns' next possession features runs of 28, 27, and 11 yards for a TD. ALL 3 RUNS ARE AWAY FROM WATT.
- Browns next possession starts on the Steelers' 15 yard line. Hunt runs for an 8 yard TD.....AWAY FROM WATT.
- Next possession is a punt
- Last possession of the first half. On 2nd & 9, Watt is double teamed, and Chubb takes a screen 21 yards. Next, Hunt runs 12 yards AWAY FROM WATT. Then Cleveland scores on a blown coverage (where Watt still gets pressure on Baker).
At this point the game is 35-7.
So yeah, the reason Watt "didn't show up" in the Cleveland game was that the Browns avoided him and went straight after Highsmith/Marsh (who were awful).
But but but... HIG factor and all that shit matters too.Professor Half Wit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:30 pmIf declarative statements were evidence you’d be in business. Too bad.SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 8:24 pmFalseProfessor Half Wit wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 6:53 pm
To be clear, I also deny Watt never makes crucial plays in crucial moments. I'm saying that even if you concede this nonsense to STD (which allows his position to be at its strongest), you can still dismiss him. And when the stongest reading of your argument can be dismissed, you're argument must not be very good.
Pot meets kettle is the only thing that can be said.SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 9:16 pmLolololz
This thread is hilarious lol !!!!
Look at yourselves. The lengths you go to try avoid simple facts is unreal but I guess I shouldn’t be surprised at this point. Lolololz
Low Watt is a good player. I won’t deny that
He disappears BIG TIME in the clutch
I’m telling you. This isn’t going to fill the hole in your soul you’re trying to fill.SteelerDayTrader wrote: ↑Fri Sep 29, 2023 9:16 pmLolololz
This thread is hilarious lol !!!!
Look at yourselves. The lengths you go to try avoid simple facts is unreal but I guess I shouldn’t be surprised at this point. Lolololz
Low Watt is a good player. I won’t deny that
He disappears BIG TIME in the clutch