Pens/NHL Offseason Thread

Here's the place for all matters puck. Be kind to your fellow posters, please.
User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Pens/NHL Offseason Thread

Post by Ice » Sat Jun 08, 2019 4:46 am

Man, that's a lot of coin and term for Jeff Skinner.

Think about the value we got on Guentzel.

Also, if 9 million for 8 years gets you Jeff Skinner in FA, Kessel, on that contract, becomes a much more valuable asset.


Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

swissvale72
Posts: 2028
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:43 am

Post by swissvale72 » Sat Jun 08, 2019 2:52 pm

Anyone else laugh their ass off at the site of Cam Neely throwing his water bottle??? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Louis Lipps Service
Posts: 3144
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 4:33 pm

Post by Louis Lipps Service » Sat Jun 08, 2019 6:46 pm

swissvale72 wrote:Anyone else laugh their ass off at the site of Cam Neely throwing his water bottle??? :lol: :lol: :lol:



In a thread titled “Pens/NHL Off-season”, you managed to post something that had nothing to with neither the Pens nor the NHL Offseason and you did it with a thread that actually did pertain to your post only 4 lines down.

That’s some impressive work!

swissvale72
Posts: 2028
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:43 am

Post by swissvale72 » Sun Jun 09, 2019 8:30 am

Louis Lipps Service wrote:
swissvale72 wrote:Anyone else laugh their ass off at the site of Cam Neely throwing his water bottle??? :lol: :lol: :lol:



In a thread titled “Pens/NHL Off-season”, you managed to post something that had nothing to with neither the Pens nor the NHL Offseason and you did it with a thread that actually did pertain to your post only 4 lines down.

That’s some impressive work!

So scaredy-cat lipps, the websites premier coward, now functions as yet another hall monitor. Maybe you can convince one of your mod friends to move the post.

User avatar
fractalsteel
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:21 pm
Location: Next to the pony wall removing a circular column

Post by fractalsteel » Sun Jun 09, 2019 1:47 pm

35 years ago on this day, the Penguins drafted Mario Lemieux. Things have worked out fairly well since then.

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:45 pm

fractalsteel wrote:35 years ago on this day, the Penguins drafted Mario Lemieux. Things have worked out fairly well since then.
Fuck I'm old.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Sun Jun 09, 2019 10:46 pm

COR-TEN wrote:
fractalsteel wrote:35 years ago on this day, the Penguins drafted Mario Lemieux. Things have worked out fairly well since then.
Fuck I'm old.


I turn 36 this summer. Been a heck of a life to be a Pens fan.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:59 am

Any draft insights, assuming the pick stays at 18 as it currently stands?
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5547
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Mon Jun 10, 2019 12:03 pm

Ice wrote:Any draft insights, assuming the pick stays at 18 as it currently stands?


I know zippo about the players in the draft

What I do know that in general, anything outside the top 5 overall picks are nothing more than lottery tickets you hope hit a couple years down the line.

That's why I could give 2 shits about keeping our first rounder in the next 3-5 years while the Sid/Geno window is open. Use it as assets to acquire players and such.

User avatar
fractalsteel
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:21 pm
Location: Next to the pony wall removing a circular column

Post by fractalsteel » Mon Jun 10, 2019 1:17 pm

Donnie Brasco wrote:
Ice wrote:Any draft insights, assuming the pick stays at 18 as it currently stands?


I know zippo about the players in the draft

What I do know that in general, anything outside the top 5 overall picks are nothing more than lottery tickets you hope hit a couple years down the line.

That's why I could give 2 shits about keeping our first rounder in the next 3-5 years while the Sid/Geno window is open. Use it as assets to acquire players and such.

The Pens are picking 21 and I have seen these names: Ryan Suzuki and Cam York in various mocks but who really knows.

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Mon Jun 10, 2019 2:33 pm

Both are interesting, at least according to the write ups, and look to be good value at 21. Like Donnie said, looks like they're both three years away from NHL playing time.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:14 pm

Ice wrote:
COR-TEN wrote:
fractalsteel wrote:35 years ago on this day, the Penguins drafted Mario Lemieux. Things have worked out fairly well since then.
Fuck I'm old.


I turn 36 this summer. Been a heck of a life to be a Pens fan.
I think I might actually give my left nut to be 36 again. RE: pens fan? I missed the hoopla during the mario/ jagr years. But am thankful I had the opportunity to watch the back to back stanley cup run recently.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5547
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Tue Jun 11, 2019 11:51 am

COR-TEN wrote:
Ice wrote:
COR-TEN wrote:I think I might actually give my left nut to be 36 again. RE: pens fan? I missed the hoopla during the mario/ jagr years. But am thankful I had the opportunity to watch the back to back stanley cup run recently.


Don't get me wrong, back to back recently was awesome but 2009 will always be the penultimate for me

User avatar
fractalsteel
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:21 pm
Location: Next to the pony wall removing a circular column

Post by fractalsteel » Tue Jun 11, 2019 12:40 pm

2009 was the big one for me as well.
After taking it on the chin the year before, then losing Hossa to the enemy, the young charges got it done in 7.

Funny how there are hundreds of posts about losing a particular player on the North side and how the Steelers couldn't be a better team for it. Yet, the BIrds lost a top 20 player in Hossa and came back the next year to win the cup.
See, it can be done.

Thankfully Mario had the gumption to fire a cup winning, a set-in-his-ways coach who was wasting the franchise so that we found the spark to win it twice more.

SteelPro
Posts: 1200
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Tue Jun 11, 2019 1:25 pm

fractalsteel wrote:2009 was the big one for me as well.
After taking it on the chin the year before, then losing Hossa to the enemy, the young charges got it done in 7.

Funny how there are hundreds of posts about losing a particular player on the North side and how the Steelers couldn't be a better team for it. Yet, the BIrds lost a top 20 player in Hossa and came back the next year to win the cup.
See, it can be done.

Thankfully Mario had the gumption to fire a cup winning, a set-in-his-ways coach who was wasting the franchise so that we found the spark to win it twice more.


This is true, but to be fair football has a whole lot more Xs and Os and coaching strategy/philosophy is much more important to football than hockey. It can take quite while for a coach to install a new system in football. Hockey it is easier to switch out a coach, and it is done often just because their message gets stale or tuned out. That can happen in football too, but the downside risk is higher. I'm fine with my football team having a longer leash than my hockey club. Though the Steelers have gone way too long with Tomlin.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5547
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:43 pm

This never gets old. Go to the 3:20 mark for the game end call


https://www.reddit.com/r/howardstern/co ... oing_play/

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:19 pm

I think we have a tendency to think of football as a "more xes and o's type of game because the action is more compartmentalized, and easier to digest, particularly on TV. The more I've learned about hockey, and especially watching the game live, the more I've developed an appreciation for the complexity of what's actually going on out there. Lot of moving (fast and constantly) parts for the coach to control and adjust to, without the benefit of anywhere near the amount of built in stoppage you see in football, baseball, or even basketball.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

SteelPro
Posts: 1200
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:38 pm

Post by SteelPro » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:13 pm

Ice wrote:I think we have a tendency to think of football as a "more xes and o's type of game because the action is more compartmentalized, and easier to digest, particularly on TV. The more I've learned about hockey, and especially watching the game live, the more I've developed an appreciation for the complexity of what's actually going on out there. Lot of moving (fast and constantly) parts for the coach to control and adjust to, without the benefit of anywhere near the amount of built in stoppage you see in football, baseball, or even basketball.


Right there is why coaching impact in hockey is limited... at least the in game management. It can't be micro managed by a coach. You can install some concepts of team oriented play, but the ability to draw up precise play designs to call upon in a game is not really possible. Not to say there aren't any set plays in hockey, but the frequency they occur and likelihood of working exactly as designed is way less common than other sports. Generally other sports you have more opportunity to isolate action for individual players and attack mismatches. That is pretty hard to do in hockey. You can look to take advantage of some line matchups. but is pretty hard to scheme to say get Crosby more open ice to work with. Good schematic coaching in hockey is more about wearing down the opponent over a much longer stretch of time. For that to work your players need to be disciplined and stay on message which is probably why NHL coaches get canned so quickly. As soon as the message starts getting stale there is no real quick fix.
People who quote themselves look like dogs who lick their balls

- Deebo referring to SteelerDayTrader

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:31 pm

The Athletic
‏Verified account @TheAthleticPGH

Penguins GM Jim Rutherford: Phil Kessel "will probably play for Pittsburgh next season."

From @JoshYohe_PGH


I don't have a subscription, so I can't share the article; but it seems as if Kessel isn't going anywhere.

I will call it a successful offseason if JJ gets moved.

User avatar
fractalsteel
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:21 pm
Location: Next to the pony wall removing a circular column

Post by fractalsteel » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:45 pm

SteelPro wrote:
Ice wrote:I think we have a tendency to think of football as a "more xes and o's type of game because the action is more compartmentalized, and easier to digest, particularly on TV. The more I've learned about hockey, and especially watching the game live, the more I've developed an appreciation for the complexity of what's actually going on out there. Lot of moving (fast and constantly) parts for the coach to control and adjust to, without the benefit of anywhere near the amount of built in stoppage you see in football, baseball, or even basketball.


Right there is why coaching impact in hockey is limited... at least the in game management. It can't be micro managed by a coach. You can install some concepts of team oriented play, but the ability to draw up precise play designs to call upon in a game is not really possible. Not to say there aren't any set plays in hockey, but the frequency they occur and likelihood of working exactly as designed is way less common than other sports. Generally other sports you have more opportunity to isolate action for individual players and attack mismatches. That is pretty hard to do in hockey. You can look to take advantage of some line matchups. but is pretty hard to scheme to say get Crosby more open ice to work with. Good schematic coaching in hockey is more about wearing down the opponent over a much longer stretch of time. For that to work your players need to be disciplined and stay on message which is probably why NHL coaches get canned so quickly. As soon as the message starts getting stale there is no real quick fix.


I also agree with your earlier sentiment about the coaching differences. The message a hockey coach has to get his players to buy into is often simpler.
For Sully, it has always been about playing fast and smart and puck possession in the OZ. In some ways, Tomlin is the opposite. He wants to play it close, to ease into a contest and hope, in the end, they have a lead or a chance to grab the lead.

I have a lot of complaints about Tomlin but this really isn't the place to vent. With Sully, my issues are some of the lines he rolls with. I'd also like to see him double up with Crosby and Malkin. He only uses that dynamic on the PP or with the extra attacker. How about closing out a period with those two on the ice?


As far as Kessel remaining with the team, I firmly believe they are going to let the current team have another shot before breaking up the band. I read a Letang interview last week and he said they should keep the team together for at least another year.

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:18 pm

SteelPro wrote:
Ice wrote:I think we have a tendency to think of football as a "more xes and o's type of game because the action is more compartmentalized, and easier to digest, particularly on TV. The more I've learned about hockey, and especially watching the game live, the more I've developed an appreciation for the complexity of what's actually going on out there. Lot of moving (fast and constantly) parts for the coach to control and adjust to, without the benefit of anywhere near the amount of built in stoppage you see in football, baseball, or even basketball.


Right there is why coaching impact in hockey is limited... at least the in game management. It can't be micro managed by a coach. You can install some concepts of team oriented play, but the ability to draw up precise play designs to call upon in a game is not really possible. Not to say there aren't any set plays in hockey, but the frequency they occur and likelihood of working exactly as designed is way less common than other sports. Generally other sports you have more opportunity to isolate action for individual players and attack mismatches. That is pretty hard to do in hockey. You can look to take advantage of some line matchups. but is pretty hard to scheme to say get Crosby more open ice to work with. Good schematic coaching in hockey is more about wearing down the opponent over a much longer stretch of time. For that to work your players need to be disciplined and stay on message which is probably why NHL coaches get canned so quickly. As soon as the message starts getting stale there is no real quick fix.
Not disagreeing at all with what you said, but I remember a game during the back to back run where the pens needed a goal, bad, and it was very late in the game or maybe OT. But Crosby skated around and talked to specific team mates and whispered in their ears before a face off, and low and behold, won the FO, passed it twice for a score. It was weird because it looked like crosby ad hoc'd a play and drew it up before the face off. Not sure that happens a lot.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Tue Jun 11, 2019 7:45 pm

Pabst wrote:
The Athletic
‏Verified account @TheAthleticPGH

Penguins GM Jim Rutherford: Phil Kessel "will probably play for Pittsburgh next season."

From @JoshYohe_PGH


I don't have a subscription, so I can't share the article; but it seems as if Kessel isn't going anywhere.

I will call it a successful offseason if JJ gets moved.


Between his NMC and the relatively bargain price of his deal (9 million for Skinner?), JR has probably reconsidered.

Great stuff on the coaching talk, guys.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
fractalsteel
Posts: 3907
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:21 pm
Location: Next to the pony wall removing a circular column

Post by fractalsteel » Tue Jun 11, 2019 8:48 pm

COR-TEN wrote:
SteelPro wrote:
Ice wrote:I think we have a tendency to think of football as a "more xes and o's type of game because the action is more compartmentalized, and easier to digest, particularly on TV. The more I've learned about hockey, and especially watching the game live, the more I've developed an appreciation for the complexity of what's actually going on out there. Lot of moving (fast and constantly) parts for the coach to control and adjust to, without the benefit of anywhere near the amount of built in stoppage you see in football, baseball, or even basketball.


Right there is why coaching impact in hockey is limited... at least the in game management. It can't be micro managed by a coach. You can install some concepts of team oriented play, but the ability to draw up precise play designs to call upon in a game is not really possible. Not to say there aren't any set plays in hockey, but the frequency they occur and likelihood of working exactly as designed is way less common than other sports. Generally other sports you have more opportunity to isolate action for individual players and attack mismatches. That is pretty hard to do in hockey. You can look to take advantage of some line matchups. but is pretty hard to scheme to say get Crosby more open ice to work with. Good schematic coaching in hockey is more about wearing down the opponent over a much longer stretch of time. For that to work your players need to be disciplined and stay on message which is probably why NHL coaches get canned so quickly. As soon as the message starts getting stale there is no real quick fix.
Not disagreeing at all with what you said, but I remember a game during the back to back run where the pens needed a goal, bad, and it was very late in the game or maybe OT. But Crosby skated around and talked to specific team mates and whispered in their ears before a face off, and low and behold, won the FO, passed it twice for a score. It was weird because it looked like crosby ad hoc'd a play and drew it up before the face off. Not sure that happens a lot.


This goes on a lot in hockey. Depends on the matchups on the ice.
Sid probably felt he could win the FO to a certain area and he wanted a teammate ready to control the puck. From there they were probably trying to take advantage of something they saw prior.

When James Neal was with the Pens, Malkin often would try to win the FO cleanly and in one motion get the puck to where Neal was stationed behind him because Neal had a wicked/accurate shot that found the net or the back of the net. It worked from time to time the year Neal scored 40 goals. That was a set play.

Orangesteel
Posts: 12797
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:23 pm

Post by Orangesteel » Tue Jun 11, 2019 10:21 pm

Donnie Brasco wrote:This never gets old. Go to the 3:20 mark for the game end call


https://www.reddit.com/r/howardstern/co ... oing_play/


I waited on hold the following day for an hour and a half and talked to Ferrell on his show about the win.
“Thoughts are a waste of time for me.” - Michael Pettaway Tomlin

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:07 pm

Rumors surfacing connecting the Pens to Trouba. It's a bit of a gamble with his pending employment status, as well as what the Jets appear to be asking (2 roster guys and a pick/ top prospect). Salary cap a definite issue, as well, if Phil is indeed going nowhere. Rusty/JJ/1st rounder?
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

User avatar
jeemie
Posts: 7503
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 10:32 pm

Post by jeemie » Wed Jun 12, 2019 1:41 pm

fractalsteel wrote:35 years ago on this day, the Penguins drafted Mario Lemieux. Things have worked out fairly well since then.


Where do the years go?

Here's another one- it's been 40 years since the Pirates last won a World Series- adding on to their longest drought in their history.

And I remember the '79 Series like it was yesterday...
“Yeah we suck, be there is a chance we could suck slightly more if we try to correct the problem.” - Art Deuce (summarized by SteelPerch)

User avatar
Pabst
Posts: 7436
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by Pabst » Wed Jun 12, 2019 2:49 pm

Ice wrote:Rumors surfacing connecting the Pens to Trouba. It's a bit of a gamble with his pending employment status, as well as what the Jets appear to be asking (2 roster guys and a pick/ top prospect). Salary cap a definite issue, as well, if Phil is indeed going nowhere. Rusty/JJ/1st rounder?

Where are you seeing these?
I'm only finding "10 Places Jacob Trouba Could Play Next Year" Bleacher Report-level articles.

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Wed Jun 12, 2019 3:50 pm

Jeemie wrote:Here's another one- it's been 40 years since the Pirates last won a World Series- adding on to their longest drought in their history.

And I remember the '79 Series like it was yesterday...
I was at one of those games of the series. Three rivers, left field, about ten rows back from the wall. Pirates lost that game but won the series, obviously.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Donnie Brasco
Posts: 5547
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 11:53 am

Post by Donnie Brasco » Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:55 pm

Pabst wrote:
Ice wrote:Rumors surfacing connecting the Pens to Trouba. It's a bit of a gamble with his pending employment status, as well as what the Jets appear to be asking (2 roster guys and a pick/ top prospect). Salary cap a definite issue, as well, if Phil is indeed going nowhere. Rusty/JJ/1st rounder?

Where are you seeing these?
I'm only finding "10 Places Jacob Trouba Could Play Next Year" Bleacher Report-level articles.


Eh I think it's a logical connection, but it's not like Trouba has been linked EXCLUSIVELY to the Pens

I think Maata and a 1st rounder would get us in the ballpark

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6755
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Wed Jun 12, 2019 9:05 pm

Inside Pittsburgh Sports had a headline touting an "aggressive" pursuit of Trouba by the Pens. It's not the most reliable site, but more so than some. The biggest potential issue is that he apparently still wants to test FA, so it's a gamble.

As someone who would like to see a little more than the rearrangement of deck chairs, it got my interest, with the bigger names in the forward lineup apparently not going anywhere.
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic