Meet your new SI swimsuit model 2016

This is where old posts that do not fit into any of the new forum categories are dumped.
R_S
Posts: 6623
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Meet your new SI swimsuit model 2016

Post by R_S » Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:19 pm

Image

Image

Cue the comments from fat chicks everywhere "it's about time they put a real woman on there!" "real woman have curves" "you go girl"


I'm starting a movement for more body conscious GQ models. Hey Ralph Lauren and Calvin Klein, stop shaming men!

Image



Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:37 pm

Given the praise for Beyonce at the SB, this is starting to make sense.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:49 pm

Well


It isn't April 1st


disturbing

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:18 pm

The value of Filipina women on the sexual marketplace just doubled.

So did the value of good looking sex robots.

At some point men are going to just say...American women aren't worth it.

But of course Mick Jagger said that 40 years ago on Some Girls.

R_S
Posts: 6623
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:31 pm

Big girls need love too, but lets not slap models in magazines with BMI's that rank them obese for PC sake.

This world is getting very bizarre. The more laws and regulations being passed aimed at keeping people healthy, the more unhealthy bodies are being praised and propped up.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:00 pm

R S wrote:Big girls need love too, but lets not slap models in magazines with BMI's that rank them obese for PC sake.

This world is getting very bizarre. The more laws and regulations being passed aimed at keeping people healthy, the more unhealthy bodies are being praised and propped up.


Well at least she isn't packing a sausage. I guess that's next.

User avatar
StillerInCT
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 2:45 pm

Post by StillerInCT » Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:57 pm

Fuck it...I'd smash
"Work harder not smarter" - Mike Tomlin

User avatar
Steelafan77
Posts: 2691
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:49 am

Post by Steelafan77 » Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:19 am

Really not that bad. They all can't have "Barbie" anatomy type measurements... :lol:

Image

Image

Image

Thrillsseeker
Posts: 5516
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:42 pm

Post by Thrillsseeker » Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:02 pm

I nailed my boss back in college while working in a restaurant. This particular girl was bigger like this but pretty. She rode the snot out of me. Like a crazed animal.

I laugh every time people talk of big girls and someone says a big girl will ride it likes it's their last or only time. Shit is for real!

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:38 pm

Body fat in public culture, art, and media, changes through time. Twiggy was thought to be anorexic, and Marilyn Monroe wasn't exactly today's runway material.

People thought Ruben's nudes were all the rage.

Although being overweight doesn't necessarily mean you are completely unhealthy, many like to legitimize their belief that a low BMI and thin is better from a health standpoint. What they really mean is that they just like skinny. Purely subjective.

Maybe 100 years from now this girl will be the norm.

No, I'm not into flab-fucking.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

VA_Steel
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 2:04 pm

Post by VA_Steel » Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:39 pm

PAWG....

R_S
Posts: 6623
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Thu Feb 11, 2016 5:48 pm

COR-TEN wrote:Body fat in public culture, art, and media, changes through time. Twiggy was thought to be anorexic, and Marilyn Monroe wasn't exactly today's runway material.

People thought Ruben's nudes were all the rage.

Although being overweight doesn't necessarily mean you are completely unhealthy, many like to legitimize their belief that a low BMI and thin is better from a health standpoint. What they really mean is that they just like skinny. Purely subjective.

Maybe 100 years from now this girl will be the norm.

No, I'm not into flab-fucking.


nobody said completely, but no matter how you spin it, carrying that much extra adipose tissue isn't healthy. It's not subjective and what is considered healthy in pop culture over the decades is irrelevant.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri Feb 12, 2016 3:29 am

Cindy Crawford 1992:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKN77NjWXxg

No real difference at all, just a matter of taste.

Right. That's the ticket.

We are Devo.

Or maybe we are Spinal Tap:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjC0vMIrOAk

How can I leave this behind? Genius.

User avatar
Obviously
Posts: 8120
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:03 pm

Post by Obviously » Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:28 am

R S wrote:Image

Image

Cue the comments from fat chicks everywhere "it's about time they put a real woman on there!" "real woman have curves" "you go girl"


I'm starting a movement for more body conscious GQ models. Hey Ralph Lauren and Calvin Klein, stop shaming men!

Image


So this would be the male comparison to Ashley Graham? :roll:
#NoMoTomlin

User avatar
Obviously
Posts: 8120
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:03 pm

Post by Obviously » Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:30 am

Image

Image

Image

Yeah. Ugly as sin. :roll:
#NoMoTomlin

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:22 pm

Yeah. This girl obviously has diabetes and heart disease, for sure. She probably has high cholesterol to boot. All that extra "adipose tissue" and all. She surely has obesity and heart disease in her family, so she's that much more susceptible. She probably takes calcium supplements to make sure her bones can hold all that extra poundage. Everybody thats "fat"(overweight) has these issues, right?

Nah, public perceptions of body image have no influence. Nope. We live in a society that perceptions don't influence policy, behavior, or the interpretation of facts/ science. Riiiiiiight.

Having said that, I am waiting for airlines to add a line item charge to your plane ticket based on your weight. In flying, weight is everything. I'm surprised it hasn't come to this yet, although Fly Derrie-Air.com(doesn't exist anymore) parodied the concept.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

User avatar
955876
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:05 pm

Having said that, I am waiting for airlines to add a line item charge to your plane ticket based on your weight. In flying, weight is everything. I'm surprised it hasn't come to this yet, although Fly Derrie-Air.com(doesn't exist anymore) parodied the conc


This is an issue that has actually come up. Not so much in terms of weight but in terms of space consumed.

I buy a ticket and you buy a ticket. We get seated next to each other. You have a "normal" body size but I am huge. My body spills over into your seat and space.

We paid the same for the ticket yet I've got a seat and a half and you only get a half seat.

Should I be required to buy two tickets?

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:33 pm

955876 wrote:
Having said that, I am waiting for airlines to add a line item charge to your plane ticket based on your weight. In flying, weight is everything. I'm surprised it hasn't come to this yet, although Fly Derrie-Air.com(doesn't exist anymore) parodied the conc


This is an issue that has actually come up. Not so much in terms of weight but in terms of space consumed.

I buy a ticket and you buy a ticket. We get seated next to each other. You have a "normal" body size but I am huge. My body spills over into your seat and space.

We paid the same for the ticket yet I've got a seat and a half and you only get a half seat.

Should I be required to buy two tickets?
If they made seats just a bit bigger, accommodating the percentile more towards the top, then the frequency of these incidences would be reduced significantly. Unfortunately, doing so reduces revenue by (x) amount. Removing seats is like removing paying passengers. Not acceptable to the bottom line. The only alternative would be to increase ticket prices, causing a loss in sales to the competition.

Instead, we get commercials about how great customer service is and "Hey look!!! Look how many amenities we have for business class or above!!!", when the most basic thing is a seat that accommodates your fucking passengers. I guess 'you get what you pay for,' and all that, but it is in fact just another type of punitive pricing.

http://www.sott.net/article/262371-Puni ... ody-weight
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:49 pm

The bigger the waistband, the deeper the quicksand, you know what I mean...bum, bum bum bum...

User avatar
JackLambert58
Posts: 8807
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:12 pm
Location: Rhode Island (Behind Enemy Lines)

Post by JackLambert58 » Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:04 pm

Not only plus-sized model Ashley Graham will appear, but mature model Nicola Griffin (56 years young) will also appear in the same issue.

Image
"Jack Lambert is mean and relentless wherever he goes, on and off the field! I do remember many times he would chase me in practice, but no way would I let him catch me" - Franco Harris

Kodiak
Posts: 19034
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:43 pm

Post by Kodiak » Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:55 pm

That girl is carrying more than a few extra pounds. Not obese, but fat or at least overweight. No more a picture of health and fitness than the anorexic run-way girls.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben comes back, Tomlin doesn't = CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

User avatar
Obviously
Posts: 8120
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:03 pm

Post by Obviously » Sun Feb 14, 2016 3:42 pm

Kodiak wrote:That girl is carrying more than a few extra pounds. Not obese, but fat or at least overweight. No more a picture of health and fitness than the anorexic run-way girls.


Since when has it been about "health and fitness"? It's always been about hotness.

If you don't think Ashley Graham is hot, I don't know what to say for you. If you think she's no hotter than this:

Image

or this

Image

then I really don't know what to say for you.
#NoMoTomlin

User avatar
COR-TEN
Posts: 12441
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 4:49 pm

Post by COR-TEN » Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:55 pm

Kodiak wrote:That girl is carrying more than a few extra pounds. Not obese, but fat or at least overweight. No more a picture of health and fitness than the anorexic run-way girls.
I think my point in all of this was that making generalizations and determinations on ones health based on what they look like is stupid, as well as inaccurate. Sure, anybody who weights 300 lbs and lives off of 32 oz cokes, Starbucks coffee, Boston Chicken, and fast food burgers/ fries is in trouble, but calling those that are on the fringes of societal norms (or "fat/ overweight) unhealthy is patently false. Same with "skinny" people, but generally, nobody seems to care if you are 10 pounds underweight. This is why anorexia doesn't get the airplay excessive weight does - because the context in which we live in is based on "skinny." On the other hand, obesity is running rampant in our society.

Unless of course, you deal in extremes and/ or hyperbole.
Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

User avatar
Steelperch
Posts: 10241
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:25 am

Post by Steelperch » Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:51 pm

This issue ought to sell as well as the next Magic Mike movie starring John Goodman... Except men will get called a bunch of sexist pigs for not buying the fat chick swimsuit edition and feminists would also find a way to blame men for the fat guy stripper movie as being sexist against women somehow as well. Can't win with these types. :lol:

User avatar
Steelperch
Posts: 10241
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:25 am

Post by Steelperch » Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:19 am

This really is the equivalent of a participation trophy for models. SI Swimsuit cover used to be reserved for the best of the best. Now it's been reduced to a pat on the head. It would be like naming Landry Jones NFL MVP to the chorus of "aww, see shitty backup QBs are superstars too."

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:35 am

Image

You guys are ridiculous.

She is fucking gorgeous.

I realize she might not be your type, but enough with the John Goodman comparisons.

Honestly in my opinion she's one of the hottest models they've had pose for the magazine in years.

User avatar
Obviously
Posts: 8120
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:03 pm

Post by Obviously » Thu Feb 18, 2016 1:22 am

Laying the Wood wrote:You guys are ridiculous.

She is fucking gorgeous.

I realize she might not be your type, but enough with the John Goodman comparisons.

Honestly in my opinion she's one of the hottest models they've had pose for the magazine in years.


Couldn't agree more.

I'd also wager that each critic in this thread would hop into bed with her in a heartbeat.
#NoMoTomlin

R_S
Posts: 6623
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:10 pm

Obviously wrote:
Kodiak wrote:That girl is carrying more than a few extra pounds. Not obese, but fat or at least overweight. No more a picture of health and fitness than the anorexic run-way girls.


Since when has it been about "health and fitness"? It's always been about hotness.

If you don't think Ashley Graham is hot, I don't know what to say for you. If you think she's no hotter than this:

Image

or this

Image

then I really don't know what to say for you.



Cool, now find me the SI issue with those girls in it......because we are talking about SI not the catwalk or whatever 2nd rate swimsuit company the other chick is modeling for.


I'd also wager that each critic in this thread would hop into bed with her in a heartbeat.


I was going to say that those so staunchly defending her physique probably have fat wives, but that would be irrelevant to the topic also.

R_S
Posts: 6623
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:55 am

Post by R_S » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:11 pm

UPDATE:

The issue just came today to the office. Ronda Rousey is on the cover of the issue I got. I'm not a fan. But I can report that not a single model looks anorexic....

There are only a couple fatties and one old bag. I suppose to keep things new we'll be seeing some tranny's all tucked up like Finkle next year. Maybe an olympian special featuring Ms Jenner in a cheeky bottom.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri Feb 19, 2016 9:25 pm

Obviously wrote:
Kodiak wrote:That girl is carrying more than a few extra pounds. Not obese, but fat or at least overweight. No more a picture of health and fitness than the anorexic run-way girls.


Since when has it been about "health and fitness"? It's always been about hotness.

If you don't think Ashley Graham is hot, I don't know what to say for you. If you think she's no hotter than this:

Image

or this

Image

then I really don't know what to say for you.


On the scale of hot, that's like comparing the AMC Pacer to the AMC Matador. Any might be fun to take for a spin if you're half in the bag.

None are my dream ride when sober.

Locked Previous topicNext topic