Imo the draft is clear

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 29841
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Imo the draft is clear

Post by bradshaw2ben » Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:17 pm

OhioSteeler wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 2:26 pm
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Tue Dec 17, 2024 10:12 pm
Ice wrote:
Tue Dec 17, 2024 6:56 pm


Unfortunately, to coin your phrase, on-brand as all get-out. Here's a question, does the fact that it probably blocks this move make you more or less happy that they signed Mooth to that kinda ridiculous extension?
Let's set aside what I think, because I don't think like them when it comes to TEs.

Warren is actually more a fit to replace Darnell Washington. IOW, he is more of a two-way TE type and while not as good a blacker as Washington, I'd expect the Steelers view would be that Warren is a better receiver. He's not––he's getting wide open looks from soft defenses worried about the run and also making tough catches in the middle of the filed that PIT won't even ask him to do. In order to move the needle, they need an upgrade to Heyward/Pruitt that might atually be a threat in the passing game. But I don't think there are that many targets to go around. My thought is that the one thing that might move the needle is if they could find a legit move TE who can block. They might get that guy some looks as WR3 and they might get him some targets that they're afraid to give to anyone else.
Does his name happen to be Harold Fannin Jr.?
Maybe ;)


“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

OhioSteeler
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 3:02 pm
Location: BF, Ohio

Post by OhioSteeler » Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:37 pm

bradshaw2ben wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 3:17 pm
OhioSteeler wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 2:26 pm
bradshaw2ben wrote:
Tue Dec 17, 2024 10:12 pm

Let's set aside what I think, because I don't think like them when it comes to TEs.

Warren is actually more a fit to replace Darnell Washington. IOW, he is more of a two-way TE type and while not as good a blacker as Washington, I'd expect the Steelers view would be that Warren is a better receiver. He's not––he's getting wide open looks from soft defenses worried about the run and also making tough catches in the middle of the filed that PIT won't even ask him to do. In order to move the needle, they need an upgrade to Heyward/Pruitt that might atually be a threat in the passing game. But I don't think there are that many targets to go around. My thought is that the one thing that might move the needle is if they could find a legit move TE who can block. They might get that guy some looks as WR3 and they might get him some targets that they're afraid to give to anyone else.
Does his name happen to be Harold Fannin Jr.?
Maybe ;)
OH standup haha

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:44 pm

Next season, Warren's touches are going to go way up
Begs the question why haven’t they gone up already?

Unfortunately, we run a DEI mandate offensively rather than using best player in a given situation.

Performance doesn’t warrant giving Connor Beyward touches. And yet there he is week after week opening g games.

Warren has shown to be the more explosive back. And yet week after week we run Najee into stacked boxes. Gotta elevate that young man after his rough childhood.

Then we gotta get Patterson his touches because he is tight with the OC.

Same goes for Myles Cole Pruitt.

Meanwhile, the TE we just gave $50 million to sits on the bench.

Meanwhile, the TE that made plays in the passing game several weeks in a row has become invisible. Not because he was failing to perform but because Myles Cole Pruitt got healthy.

Shit, if not for the team being forced to use Mike Williams he would not have even been in the game for that game winning TD catch.

We check boxes on offense before even considering how to best attack a defense.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Wed Dec 18, 2024 6:51 pm

955876 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:44 pm
Next season, Warren's touches are going to go way up
Begs the question why haven’t they gone up already?

Unfortunately, we run a DEI mandate offensively rather than using best player in a given situation.

Performance doesn’t warrant giving Connor Beyward touches. And yet there he is week after week opening g games.

Warren has shown to be the more explosive back. And yet week after week we run Najee into stacked boxes. Gotta elevate that young man after his rough childhood.

Then we gotta get Patterson his touches because he is tight with the OC.

Same goes for Myles Cole Pruitt.

Meanwhile, the TE we just gave $50 million to sits on the bench.

Meanwhile, the TE that made plays in the passing game several weeks in a row has become invisible. Not because he was failing to perform but because Myles Cole Pruitt got healthy.

Shit, if not for the team being forced to use Mike Williams he would not have even been in the game for that game winning TD catch.

We check boxes on offense before even considering how to best attack a defense.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 7:49 pm

Care to elaborate on which parts you disagree with?

You think Connor Heyward should be on the field to start games?

You think he and Myles Cole Pruitt should be getting snaps over Muth and your boy Washington?

You like Patterson getting snaps over Warren?

You disagree that Williams was only in on that play because Austin was hurt.

:roll: :roll: :roll:
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

User avatar
K_C_
Posts: 32319
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:37 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Contact:

Post by K_C_ » Wed Dec 18, 2024 9:55 pm

955876 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:44 pm
Next season, Warren's touches are going to go way up
Begs the question why haven’t they gone up already?
My opinion?

I think Warren's touches have been pretty limited because he's undersized and the Steelers fear he won't hold up if given bell cow level touches.

....and they're probably right. Also, Warren is a little looser with the ball than Najee is (which is ironic after Najee's huge, game altering fumble) and because Arthur Smith prefers to have a power back, ala Derrick Henry, so Warren may never get the kind of carries in Pittsburgh we'd like to see him get.

That's why they'll draft a back capable of doing what Najee does and I think they can get a guy like that pretty late. Hell, maybe @bradshaw2ben is right and they'll pull some kind of weird Jahmyr Gibbs type first round speed back and have him share carries with Warren, kind of like what the Lions were doing with Montgomery and Gibbs, who knows?

But while I'd like to see Warren's touches go up (and I'm sure they will once Najee is gone) I'm also concerned if the dude can hold up to getting hit a lot more. Warren is not a big dude.
"...It's very difficult to keep the line between the past and the present... Do you know what I mean...?"

Edith 'Little Edie' Bouvier Beale

User avatar
gojira5150
Posts: 1085
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:42 pm

Post by gojira5150 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:48 pm

K_C_ wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 9:55 pm
955876 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:44 pm
Next season, Warren's touches are going to go way up
Begs the question why haven’t they gone up already?
My opinion?

I think Warren's touches have been pretty limited because he's undersized and the Steelers fear he won't hold up if given bell cow level touches.

....and they're probably right. Also, Warren is a little looser with the ball than Najee is (which is ironic after Najee's huge, game altering fumble) and because Arthur Smith prefers to have a power back, ala Derrick Henry, so Warren may never get the kind of carries in Pittsburgh we'd like to see him get.

That's why they'll draft a back capable of doing what Najee does and I think they can get a guy like that pretty late. Hell, maybe @bradshaw2ben is right and they'll pull some kind of weird Jahmyr Gibbs type first round speed back and have him share carries with Warren, kind of like what the Lions were doing with Montgomery and Gibbs, who knows?

But while I'd like to see Warren's touches go up (and I'm sure they will once Najee is gone) I'm also concerned if the dude can hold up to getting hit a lot more. Warren is not a big dude.
I sure hope the Cryboys throw big C2$ at Najee so Steelers can move on from him.
Obliteration Is Imminent

User avatar
K_C_
Posts: 32319
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:37 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Contact:

Post by K_C_ » Wed Dec 18, 2024 11:13 pm

gojira5150 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:48 pm
K_C_ wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 9:55 pm
955876 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:44 pm


Begs the question why haven’t they gone up already?
My opinion?

I think Warren's touches have been pretty limited because he's undersized and the Steelers fear he won't hold up if given bell cow level touches.

....and they're probably right. Also, Warren is a little looser with the ball than Najee is (which is ironic after Najee's huge, game altering fumble) and because Arthur Smith prefers to have a power back, ala Derrick Henry, so Warren may never get the kind of carries in Pittsburgh we'd like to see him get.

That's why they'll draft a back capable of doing what Najee does and I think they can get a guy like that pretty late. Hell, maybe @bradshaw2ben is right and they'll pull some kind of weird Jahmyr Gibbs type first round speed back and have him share carries with Warren, kind of like what the Lions were doing with Montgomery and Gibbs, who knows?

But while I'd like to see Warren's touches go up (and I'm sure they will once Najee is gone) I'm also concerned if the dude can hold up to getting hit a lot more. Warren is not a big dude.
I sure hope the Cryboys throw big C2$ at Najee so Steelers can move on from him.
If the Steelers wanted to retain Harris, they would have extended him.

He wouldn't have cost a ridiculous amount and the Steelers didn't try very hard to make a deal.

It's pretty clear Arthur Smith believes that while Harris is a good NFL back, he's not elite in any one area and the Steelers will move on to a younger power back to pair with Warren (and maybe Patterson again too.)

I think Najee is done in Pittsburgh no matter how well he does from here on out.

That fumble......Jesus Christ was that a killer. I can't hate Najee too much for that because he almost never puts the ball on the ground but the timing for him especially, was awful.
"...It's very difficult to keep the line between the past and the present... Do you know what I mean...?"

Edith 'Little Edie' Bouvier Beale

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Wed Dec 18, 2024 11:37 pm

My opinion?

I think Warren's touches have been pretty limited because he's undersized and the Steelers fear he won't hold up if given bell cow level touches.
Could be.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

OhioSteeler
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 3:02 pm
Location: BF, Ohio

Post by OhioSteeler » Thu Dec 19, 2024 2:14 pm

Not necessarily saying I agree with it, but I have a feeling Kaleb Johnson will be their draft crush.

User avatar
gojira5150
Posts: 1085
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 3:42 pm

Post by gojira5150 » Thu Dec 19, 2024 5:57 pm

OhioSteeler wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2024 2:14 pm
Not necessarily saying I agree with it, but I have a feeling Kaleb Johnson will be their draft crush.
As long as they don't take him in the 1st RD. Dude can run, has speed & vision.
Obliteration Is Imminent

OhioSteeler
Posts: 97
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2020 3:02 pm
Location: BF, Ohio

Post by OhioSteeler » Thu Dec 19, 2024 6:25 pm

gojira5150 wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2024 5:57 pm
OhioSteeler wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2024 2:14 pm
Not necessarily saying I agree with it, but I have a feeling Kaleb Johnson will be their draft crush.
As long as they don't take him in the 1st RD. Dude can run, has speed & vision.
I feel like he checks boxes for them. Young, doesn't have a ton of carries and I think he can thrive in the zone system that Smith seems to love...plus he's from OH (that's a point for me haha).

I think the depth at RB for the draft should push him down nicely.

User avatar
smithessmokin
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:43 am

Post by smithessmokin » Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:24 am

I couldn’t disagree more.

1. WR #2
The offense can’t do shit without Pickens. We need someone who can complement Pickens and step up if Pickens is injured and or not retained long term.

2. DL
I look at this and say we need another starting caliber defensive tackle. Cameron Heyward has been playing better this year, but we need another young buck that can come in and dominate.

3. RB #1
If you want a dominant ground game, go draft a dominant back. Najee should not be retained, he is not a fit for this offense. Warren is proving effective, but I dominant back would really propel this offense forward.

4. CB #2
To be clear, I really like what Donte Jackson has been able to do this year for us. However, he’s a free agent, so we may need to replace him even though I suspect he’ll be back on a pretty affordable deal.

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:38 am

smithessmokin wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:24 am
I couldn’t disagree more.

1. WR #2
The offense can’t do shit without Pickens. We need someone who can complement Pickens and step up if Pickens is injured and or not retained long term.

2. DL
I look at this and say we need another starting caliber defensive tackle. Cameron Heyward has been playing better this year, but we need another young buck that can come in and dominate.

3. RB #1
If you want a dominant ground game, go draft a dominant back. Najee should not be retained, he is not a fit for this offense. Warren is proving effective, but I dominant back would really propel this offense forward.

4. CB #2
To be clear, I really like what Donte Jackson has been able to do this year for us. However, he’s a free agent, so we may need to replace him even though I suspect he’ll be back on a pretty affordable deal.
:roll:

You wanna put a rd 1 draft pick on a WR ??

The Steelers have one of the best WRs in the NFL and they rarely even target him

Much less have any intention of trying to win games with offense

The punt down 2 scores late was so typical Steelers

Including the defensive collapse led by Low Watt and Scam among others

Of course if the Steelers got smart they’d trade Low Watt for picks draft Cam Ward AND a premium WR AAAND fill in a good portion of the defense

Fat fucking chance of that happening
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
Ice
Posts: 6868
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 7:41 pm
Location: Delawhere?

Post by Ice » Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:03 am

gojira5150 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 10:48 pm
K_C_ wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 9:55 pm
955876 wrote:
Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:44 pm


Begs the question why haven’t they gone up already?
My opinion?

I think Warren's touches have been pretty limited because he's undersized and the Steelers fear he won't hold up if given bell cow level touches.

....and they're probably right. Also, Warren is a little looser with the ball than Najee is (which is ironic after Najee's huge, game altering fumble) and because Arthur Smith prefers to have a power back, ala Derrick Henry, so Warren may never get the kind of carries in Pittsburgh we'd like to see him get.

That's why they'll draft a back capable of doing what Najee does and I think they can get a guy like that pretty late. Hell, maybe @bradshaw2ben is right and they'll pull some kind of weird Jahmyr Gibbs type first round speed back and have him share carries with Warren, kind of like what the Lions were doing with Montgomery and Gibbs, who knows?

But while I'd like to see Warren's touches go up (and I'm sure they will once Najee is gone) I'm also concerned if the dude can hold up to getting hit a lot more. Warren is not a big dude.
I sure hope the Cryboys throw big C2$ at Najee so Steelers can move on from him.
So, we want the illusion of Henry, so we draft Najee, and then the Pokes are so mad they whiffed on Henry in FA that they sign Najee? Circle of life :lol:
Nothing left to do but smile, smile, smile...

Deebo
Posts: 2280
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:22 pm

Post by Deebo » Fri Dec 20, 2024 12:55 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:38 am
smithessmokin wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:24 am
I couldn’t disagree more.

1. WR #2
The offense can’t do shit without Pickens. We need someone who can complement Pickens and step up if Pickens is injured and or not retained long term.

2. DL
I look at this and say we need another starting caliber defensive tackle. Cameron Heyward has been playing better this year, but we need another young buck that can come in and dominate.

3. RB #1
If you want a dominant ground game, go draft a dominant back. Najee should not be retained, he is not a fit for this offense. Warren is proving effective, but I dominant back would really propel this offense forward.

4. CB #2
To be clear, I really like what Donte Jackson has been able to do this year for us. However, he’s a free agent, so we may need to replace him even though I suspect he’ll be back on a pretty affordable deal.
:roll:

You wanna put a rd 1 draft pick on a WR ??

The Steelers have one of the best WRs in the NFL and they rarely even target him

Much less have any intention of trying to win games with offense

The punt down 2 scores late was so typical Steelers

Including the defensive collapse led by Low Watt and Scam among others

Of course if the Steelers got smart they’d trade Low Watt for picks draft Cam Ward AND a premium WR AAAND fill in a good portion of the defense

Fat fucking chance of that happening
Have to hedge your bets that :

a) Pickens doesn't resign here
b) He gets injured again

They absolutely MUST rebuild the WR depth. Because right now it's Pickens and a bunch of scrubs who'd be 3-5WRs on most other teams.

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 29841
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Fri Dec 20, 2024 1:46 pm

gojira5150 wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2024 5:57 pm
OhioSteeler wrote:
Thu Dec 19, 2024 2:14 pm
Not necessarily saying I agree with it, but I have a feeling Kaleb Johnson will be their draft crush.
As long as they don't take him in the 1st RD. Dude can run, has speed & vision.
I think lack of vision is the knock on him. I haven’t watched him enough to have an opinion. He’s big and fast for sure.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 29841
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Fri Dec 20, 2024 1:49 pm

They should just get deck chairs to replace all the WRs. Then they can rearrange as they like.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri Dec 20, 2024 4:37 pm

Deebo wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 12:55 pm
SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:38 am
smithessmokin wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:24 am
I couldn’t disagree more.

1. WR #2
The offense can’t do shit without Pickens. We need someone who can complement Pickens and step up if Pickens is injured and or not retained long term.

2. DL
I look at this and say we need another starting caliber defensive tackle. Cameron Heyward has been playing better this year, but we need another young buck that can come in and dominate.

3. RB #1
If you want a dominant ground game, go draft a dominant back. Najee should not be retained, he is not a fit for this offense. Warren is proving effective, but I dominant back would really propel this offense forward.

4. CB #2
To be clear, I really like what Donte Jackson has been able to do this year for us. However, he’s a free agent, so we may need to replace him even though I suspect he’ll be back on a pretty affordable deal.
:roll:

You wanna put a rd 1 draft pick on a WR ??

The Steelers have one of the best WRs in the NFL and they rarely even target him

Much less have any intention of trying to win games with offense

The punt down 2 scores late was so typical Steelers

Including the defensive collapse led by Low Watt and Scam among others

Of course if the Steelers got smart they’d trade Low Watt for picks draft Cam Ward AND a premium WR AAAND fill in a good portion of the defense

Fat fucking chance of that happening
Have to hedge your bets that :

a) Pickens doesn't resign here
b) He gets injured again

They absolutely MUST rebuild the WR depth. Because right now it's Pickens and a bunch of scrubs who'd be 3-5WRs on most other teams.
You can draft great WRs later

Why bother spending top 100 draft capital on a position you don’t know how to use correctly, and you and most of your fanbase actively work against ??

Plenty of WRs later in this draft for the Steelers

And. Truth be told I’m not sure most of the top WRs in this draft wouldn’t be a round or two later most other years
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri Dec 20, 2024 4:41 pm

bradshaw2ben wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 1:49 pm
They should just get deck chairs to replace all the WRs. Then they can rearrange as they like.
Might as well.

You know as well as I do it won’t matter who the Steelers draft at WR the offense will be the same

This ship is made of steel. It will never sink
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:31 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:38 am
smithessmokin wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 3:24 am
I couldn’t disagree more.

1. WR #2
The offense can’t do shit without Pickens. We need someone who can complement Pickens and step up if Pickens is injured and or not retained long term.

2. DL
I look at this and say we need another starting caliber defensive tackle. Cameron Heyward has been playing better this year, but we need another young buck that can come in and dominate.

3. RB #1
If you want a dominant ground game, go draft a dominant back. Najee should not be retained, he is not a fit for this offense. Warren is proving effective, but I dominant back would really propel this offense forward.

4. CB #2
To be clear, I really like what Donte Jackson has been able to do this year for us. However, he’s a free agent, so we may need to replace him even though I suspect he’ll be back on a pretty affordable deal.
:roll:

You wanna put a rd 1 draft pick on a WR ??

The Steelers have one of the best WRs in the NFL and they rarely even target him

Much less have any intention of trying to win games with offense

The punt down 2 scores late was so typical Steelers

Including the defensive collapse led by Low Watt and Scam among others

Of course if the Steelers got smart they’d trade Low Watt for picks draft Cam Ward AND a premium WR AAAND fill in a good portion of the defense

Fat fucking chance of that happening
If it’s how the team chooses to play offensive football what good does trading Low Watt do to draft a QB and WR?

Wouldn’t they still be punting on 4th down while behind two scores after not targeting that WR much earlier in the game?

Hmmmmm
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Fri Dec 20, 2024 6:32 pm

You know as well as I do it won’t matter who the Steelers draft at WR the offense will be the same
So then why trade Watt if the results will just be the same?
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:18 pm

The bottom line with Low Watt is this

He’s worth more in draft picks than what he delivers
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6490
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:55 pm

But is he though? Especially given Jibb’s record without Watt.

I’m just trying to understand the logic here. On one hand you say it doesn’t matter who we draft at WR given how the Steelers choose to play offensive football.

Then on the other hand you say trade Watt and then draft a WR.

Not very consistent logic.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:51 pm

955876 wrote:
Fri Dec 20, 2024 8:55 pm
But is he though? Especially given Jibb’s record without Watt.

I’m just trying to understand the logic here. On one hand you say it doesn’t matter who we draft at WR given how the Steelers choose to play offensive football.

Then on the other hand you say trade Watt and then draft a WR.

Not very consistent logic.
False
SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

User avatar
anpsteel
Posts: 3392
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:47 pm

Post by anpsteel » Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:01 pm

This coach, and this offensive scheme, do not prioritize the passing game enough, to merit a first round pick on a WR.

That being said, I don't want to use a first round pick on a RB, either.


The first round, for this team, should be either line, or anywhere on defense, based upon need and available players, imo.
I am lazy and I use voice to text far too often.

Please disregard any ridiculous grammatical or contextual errors.

I will strive to do better

:lol:

Deebo
Posts: 2280
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:22 pm

Post by Deebo » Mon Dec 23, 2024 1:23 pm

anpsteel wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:01 pm
This coach, and this offensive scheme, do not prioritize the passing game enough, to merit a first round pick on a WR.

That being said, I don't want to use a first round pick on a RB, either.


The first round, for this team, should be either line, or anywhere on defense, based upon need and available players, imo.
The more this team loses games without Pickens available, the higher the likelihood we spend a Rd 1 pick on a WR

User avatar
anpsteel
Posts: 3392
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2019 9:47 pm

Post by anpsteel » Mon Dec 23, 2024 2:31 pm

Deebo wrote:
Mon Dec 23, 2024 1:23 pm
anpsteel wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:01 pm
This coach, and this offensive scheme, do not prioritize the passing game enough, to merit a first round pick on a WR.

That being said, I don't want to use a first round pick on a RB, either.


The first round, for this team, should be either line, or anywhere on defense, based upon need and available players, imo.
The more this team loses games without Pickens available, the higher the likelihood we spend a Rd 1 pick on a WR
I don’t completely disagree because they will make illogical moves

But aside from the offense not prioritizing the passing game, there is zero chance they pay two first round wide receivers a C2

Also add to it, receivers very rarely have much if any impact their rookie year

You have to assume Tomlin is operating on a limited time

So, imo, any additional wide receiver coming on is going to do so as a free agent
I am lazy and I use voice to text far too often.

Please disregard any ridiculous grammatical or contextual errors.

I will strive to do better

:lol:

W&M_Steeler
Posts: 1662
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:55 am

Post by W&M_Steeler » Mon Dec 23, 2024 2:33 pm

Deebo wrote:
Mon Dec 23, 2024 1:23 pm
anpsteel wrote:
Sat Dec 21, 2024 3:01 pm
This coach, and this offensive scheme, do not prioritize the passing game enough, to merit a first round pick on a WR.

That being said, I don't want to use a first round pick on a RB, either.


The first round, for this team, should be either line, or anywhere on defense, based upon need and available players, imo.
The more this team loses games without Pickens available, the higher the likelihood we spend a Rd 1 pick on a WR
I think we need to take another OT in the first round, just in case.

Steeldrama
Posts: 2523
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:44 pm

Post by Steeldrama » Mon Dec 23, 2024 2:38 pm

You have to assume Tomlin is operating on a limited time
Huh?

“Tomlin has more job security than the pope”

Dude has all the time in the world
Nick Markakis on Astros: "Every guy over there needs a beating."

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic