What calls against Baltimore or Detroit or not defensible, explainable..
The fourth down pass against Cleveland was 100% DPI… DB never turned to look for the ball grab the receivers arms prior to the Ball arriving
What calls against Baltimore or Detroit or not defensible, explainable..
And why it’s dumb to coach in a manner that makes one 60 minutes of football come down to a single 5 second play.swissvale72 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:10 pmWhat calls against Baltimore or Detroit or not defensible, explainable..
The fourth down pass against Cleveland was 100% DPI… DB never turned to look for the ball grab the receivers arms prior to the Ball arriving
I am not doing thisswissvale72 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:10 pmWhat calls against Baltimore or Detroit or not defensible, explainable..
The fourth down pass against Cleveland was 100% DPI… DB never turned to look for the ball grab the receivers arms prior to the Ball arriving
Ravens were home team and got jobbed against Steelers. Not sure I buy that theory. Has to be more too itswissvale72 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 01, 2026 1:29 pmCuz they're the home team, Sunday night...nothing more. Of course, didn't work out that way on a blatant OPI that wasn't called against the packers tight end against Steelers in the Sunday nighter earlier this yearJtf wrote: ↑Thu Jan 01, 2026 5:41 amLast week was rigged or messed with but so was the lions game and ravens game to get to this Sunday night game. It’s not just one game. It’s multiple for both teams. It’s ridiculous the league needs investigation into it.swissvale72 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 30, 2025 9:49 pmOK, I know I've been on record as acknowledging that the Steelers were kind of the beneficiary of officiating against both Baltimore and Detroit… But… They clearly have been fucked over big-time lately .
First off, although DK was a fucking idiot the NFL was way too harsh with the two game suspension and then despite most of the Talking Heads predicting it would be reduced to one, sticking with the two game deal. That was fucking bullshit.
And then, what was really fucking bullshit was the non-call on a DPI that fucking DB was not looking back for the ball. It was yanking Valdez, his arm down prior to the arrival of the ball. Steelers would have tied that game and not unreasonable to believe that that overtime would have ended in a tie with steelers clenching the north.
I found out today that one of McAfee's boys, tone digz, who I'm sort of related to my marriage posts…"fuck the NFL!!" Not watching the Sunday nighter". I agree with the fuck the NFL part and fuck Roger Goodell bringing me back to the suspension of James Harrison in 2010. That's when I called in to Stan severance show and told him my vote for Jagoff of the week was Stan savran for naming James Harrison as jagoff of the week. Stan didn't like that, was pissed at me.
but I'll certainly be watching on Sunday night
Steelers were gifted two wins recently by calls and got screwed last week. I saw you said you think Steelers will get calls this week in another post ? Why do you feel they will get calls or so get calls ? Tomlin ? Impressive a fan for their team admitting they got some calls. Most fans on bitch when they get screwed

Yeah...kraft wouldn't allow it. Back in 2010 allowed ben to twist in the wind, send an email the season ticket holders, saying all the steelers aren't bad guys, all the satisfying, the shady side bistro crowdDumlinBumlinStumlin wrote: ↑Fri Jan 02, 2026 8:35 pmWhat is also true. Art the Lessor is a major CUCK, he's likes being walked over. What a disgrace, retire you FUCK
Well for one the go ahead TD to Likely that was called a TD on the field should never have been overturned in NY. That was the polar opposite of indisputable evidenceswissvale72 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 01, 2026 9:10 pmWhat calls against Baltimore or Detroit or not defensible, explainable..
The fourth down pass against Cleveland was 100% DPI… DB never turned to look for the ball grab the receivers arms prior to the Ball arriving
Glazer's reporting on this is highly misleading. And I'd remind everyone that the fan has already lawyered up. I guarantee Glazer's report was run by legal before he went on air. Every word of it.jeemie wrote: ↑Fri Jan 02, 2026 8:25 pm...and while he might not have used slurs this time in Detroit, he apparently did in the earlier incident (and there are witnesses for this, apparently).
A lot about this doesn't smell right. Hell, Diggs and Barmore are being allowed to play, and they have been CHARGED.
Accepting all this, CK...2 game suspension was still excessive.CKSteeler wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 7:25 amGlazer's reporting on this is highly misleading. And I'd remind everyone that the fan has already lawyered up. I guarantee Glazer's report was run by legal before he went on air. Every word of it.jeemie wrote: ↑Fri Jan 02, 2026 8:25 pm...and while he might not have used slurs this time in Detroit, he apparently did in the earlier incident (and there are witnesses for this, apparently).
A lot about this doesn't smell right. Hell, Diggs and Barmore are being allowed to play, and they have been CHARGED.
Glazer said that the fan used "derogatory" language. He said he would not repeat it. What he DID NOT say is that the fan said what Metcalf claimed which would if the accounts from other fans interviewed supported it, been perfectly acceptable. That would in fact be the KEY detail we need when assessing Metcalf's behavior. Did Metcalf lie or not? It's the main question and the one Glazer didn't answer. I refuse to believe that wasn't intentional.
So Glazer went on air (he's Tomlin's buddy and number one media flunky, mind you) to support Metcalf. Likely because the Steelers/Tomlin asked him to. He proceeds to leave out the single detail that would have made people sympathetic to Metccalf? Yea, not buying it.
The second thing he avoided saying straight up is whether said fan was thrown out of the game. He claims that some or at least one of the fans (because none of this is specific) wanted NFL security to throw him out, but he doesn't just tell us that the fan was removed. Given that he was back at this game, we know he wasn't banned from NFL events.
So we have a fan who allegedly used the n-word at one of the players on the field. That's Metcalf's story. But NFL security or the Lions security didn't have him banned from future events for that? He may not even have been thrown out of that game?
None of that adds up. I think the fan said things to Metcalf. I think he was definitely an asshole. I don't think he said what Metcalf later accused him of. And I don't think he was even removed from THAT game because if he said what Metcalf said, he would almost certainly have been removed and banned from future events. I have little doubt about that. The fans backed up what Metcalf initially accused the fan of at that point or at least that the fan said some shit that wasn't nice. That's about it.
Glazer is a propagandist as many of these sports reporters are. They care about being first and maintaining their contacts and relationships across the league. They're somehow even worse than the scumbags who report on politics from an ethical standpoint.
Glazer's report was intentionally vague and intended to muddy the waters. He said next to nothing beyond that there was a prior incident which we already knew. He wanted to create the impression that Metcalf didn't lie about that shit without accepting any liability for doing so. His goal was to mislead and deflect.
Agree - While Glazer's report had huge gaps, one thing I found interesting was that he said fans around those guy wanted him removed last year.swissvale72 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 12:35 pmAccepting all this, CK...2 game suspension was still excessive.CKSteeler wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 7:25 amGlazer's reporting on this is highly misleading. And I'd remind everyone that the fan has already lawyered up. I guarantee Glazer's report was run by legal before he went on air. Every word of it.jeemie wrote: ↑Fri Jan 02, 2026 8:25 pm...and while he might not have used slurs this time in Detroit, he apparently did in the earlier incident (and there are witnesses for this, apparently).
A lot about this doesn't smell right. Hell, Diggs and Barmore are being allowed to play, and they have been CHARGED.
Glazer said that the fan used "derogatory" language. He said he would not repeat it. What he DID NOT say is that the fan said what Metcalf claimed which would if the accounts from other fans interviewed supported it, been perfectly acceptable. That would in fact be the KEY detail we need when assessing Metcalf's behavior. Did Metcalf lie or not? It's the main question and the one Glazer didn't answer. I refuse to believe that wasn't intentional.
So Glazer went on air (he's Tomlin's buddy and number one media flunky, mind you) to support Metcalf. Likely because the Steelers/Tomlin asked him to. He proceeds to leave out the single detail that would have made people sympathetic to Metccalf? Yea, not buying it.
The second thing he avoided saying straight up is whether said fan was thrown out of the game. He claims that some or at least one of the fans (because none of this is specific) wanted NFL security to throw him out, but he doesn't just tell us that the fan was removed. Given that he was back at this game, we know he wasn't banned from NFL events.
So we have a fan who allegedly used the n-word at one of the players on the field. That's Metcalf's story. But NFL security or the Lions security didn't have him banned from future events for that? He may not even have been thrown out of that game?
None of that adds up. I think the fan said things to Metcalf. I think he was definitely an asshole. I don't think he said what Metcalf later accused him of. And I don't think he was even removed from THAT game because if he said what Metcalf said, he would almost certainly have been removed and banned from future events. I have little doubt about that. The fans backed up what Metcalf initially accused the fan of at that point or at least that the fan said some shit that wasn't nice. That's about it.
Glazer is a propagandist as many of these sports reporters are. They care about being first and maintaining their contacts and relationships across the league. They're somehow even worse than the scumbags who report on politics from an ethical standpoint.
Glazer's report was intentionally vague and intended to muddy the waters. He said next to nothing beyond that there was a prior incident which we already knew. He wanted to create the impression that Metcalf didn't lie about that shit without accepting any liability for doing so. His goal was to mislead and deflect.
Well, Swiss anyone who has been paying attention to NFL suspensions of any kind since Goodell took over in 2006 or 07 knows there is zero consistency to any of it. Even the CBA doesn't guarantee consistency. I think I was literally the first person to rant about this in 2007 when he started suspending Bungles. Some people have caught on since then, though most mouth breathers have always been on the side that he actually needs to be harsher somehow (until it impacts their teams guy - not saying this is you here).swissvale72 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 12:35 pmAccepting all this, CK...2 game suspension was still excessive.
I'm not going to defend the competency of NFL or the Lion's personal security staff with one caveat. If he had said the n-word AT a player, I have little doubt he would have been suspended/banned. So the only thing I'll reiterate is that I don't think he said those words.Stillerz Bar wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 12:59 pmAgree - While Glazer's report had huge gaps, one thing I found interesting was that he said fans around those guy wanted him removed last year.
If true, why would the league let this guy back, let alone one with Metcalfe playing and why would they let him anywhere near the edge of the field.
I think we all agree that Metcalfe was an idiot for getting pulled into this fans BS. But that doesn't absolve the league's responsibility in letting it happen.
Also, the fact that multiple other players had fan interactions in the last few years without suspensions means, at worst the should have given him.one game. If the league then.wanted to make a statement saying this kind of thing is getting out of hand so here's how it will be handled going forward - for both players and fans, that would make more sense.
And you know this how?
Yep. This team brought this on themselves and thus, fucked themselves over.CKSteeler wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 4:16 pmMeanwhile in fantasy land, Depot is running an article "just blame DK" if they miss the playoffs. And while some may find it tiresome to circle everything back to Tomlin, it's often times true.
1. Metcalf was a known hothead before coming to the Steelers. They jettisoned one problematic WR to get another one albeit one whose problems are of a slightly different sort. Personal fouls and even violent outbursts are not new for Metcalf.
2. Tomlin was, per reports, basically the main driver of all of this.
3. They could have - and as I argued and I know of the rest of you argued - they could have kept Pickens for at least this season and benefited from his on-field play to some degree. Chose not to. If it wasn't this suspension, it could have just as easily been an injury to Metcalf that derailed things. It's not great roster management or construction.
Christ, I've probably been one of the more sympathetic voices with regards to the decision to ditch Pickens. I g et it from both sides. But you made that choice as a franchise. So you get the responsibility when it obviously backfired.
Final point - Tomlin just does not run a tight ship so dumb shit like this follows his team year after year. This was a new flavor of the same old stupid. He was the same coach who said do what comes natural to Ramsey when being spat upon regardless of whether it hurts the team and potentially Ramsey himself so...you get what you incentivize.
Again all I said was both things can be true at the same time.CKSteeler wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 4:16 pmMeanwhile in fantasy land, Depot is running an article "just blame DK" if they miss the playoffs. And while some may find it tiresome to circle everything back to Tomlin, it's often times true.
1. Metcalf was a known hothead before coming to the Steelers. They jettisoned one problematic WR to get another one albeit one whose problems are of a slightly different sort. Personal fouls and even violent outbursts are not new for Metcalf.
2. Tomlin was, per reports, basically the main driver of all of this.
3. They could have - and as I argued and I know of the rest of you argued - they could have kept Pickens for at least this season and benefited from his on-field play to some degree. Chose not to. If it wasn't this suspension, it could have just as easily been an injury to Metcalf that derailed things. It's not great roster management or construction.
Christ, I've probably been one of the more sympathetic voices with regards to the decision to ditch Pickens. I g et it from both sides. But you made that choice as a franchise. So you get the responsibility when it obviously backfired.
Final point - Tomlin just does not run a tight ship so dumb shit like this follows his team year after year. This was a new flavor of the same old stupid. He was the same coach who said do what comes natural to Ramsey when being spat upon regardless of whether it hurts the team and potentially Ramsey himself so...you get what you incentivize.
Exactly right about Kraft and Rooney....and yes, DK is a dumbfuck but NFL is fucked up with this penalty. After the initial 2 game suspension, every fuckin analyst I heard predicted a reduction to 1 game.955876 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 8:04 pmAnd soft. Don’t forget soft.
Kraft would have never tolerated two game suspension with playoffs on the line.
Dunce Rooney bends over like he always does and says thank you sir may I have another. All the while putting it out there DK will still get his money.
Jibba is a fraud and a JV coach but Dunce Rooney is the biggest problem here.
Hated that fucking trade from the beginning! The NFL office is still fucked up. And Art IIis still a weak ass bitch who lets his team get pushed around.955876 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 03, 2026 11:13 pmAnd? To me it’s just karma after having to jettison yet another WR Jibba couldn’t manage only to get another turd he can’t manage. And have a massive contract to as well.
The team fucked themselves when they thought they could field a WR corps with Scotty Miller, Ben Skoronek, and CAIII.
An injury to DK could have just as easily put us in this exact spot.
A key “standard” in all Jibba Jabber coached teams is to create a hole due to poor roster composition.
Jibba always has an excuse in his pocket.
No doubt if we don’t win tomorrow he will use that as being a huge reason.
And dumb Dunce Rooney will believe.
Plus, the f you can’t beat a 3 win team to wrap up the division and solidify your playoff spot all because you are down a receiver then you are a bad team anyways.
We are a bad team. Just look at who these turds chose to fill out our WR unit.
Worst in the league bad.
Poor Jibba. Begs his GM to trade Pickens to “save the locker room” and try n this happens.
This team is a soap opera.
1 game wouldn't have been enough, IMO. Could have been more than 2 as far as I'm concerned.swissvale72 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 04, 2026 2:30 amDo you think the 2 game suspension was fair? Do you think the 4th down play last week should have been flagged DPI?
I don't think I ever suggested rigged. Incompetent officiating, yes.
Really hoping it bites them in their dumb asses too.Steelers made their bed when they made the genius move of bringing in Metcalf who isn't all that great of a wr to begin with.
DK is a “pro” that just signed a $150 million dollar contract yet is sooooo fucking weak minded that he gets sucked in to an altercation by a blue haired idiot.1 game wouldn't have been enough, IMO. Could have been more than 2 as far as I'm concerned.