Omar Khan loves him some Trubisky

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
SteelerDayTrader
Posts: 8890
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 9:12 pm

Omar Khan loves him some Trubisky

Post by SteelerDayTrader » Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:24 pm

I don’t know why so many of you worship this JAG bean counter

https://triblive.com/sports/steelers-gm ... backup-qb/
Last edited by SteelerDayTrader on Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.


SteelerFury Best Poster Award Winner / All-Time King of Ban / On-call SteelerFury Moderator

Rooting for losses since 2025

Stillchest
Posts: 938
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:52 am

Post by Stillchest » Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:31 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:24 pm
I don’t know why so many of you worship this bean counter

https://triblive.com/sports/steelers-gm ... backup-qb/
[/quote

They’ll keep Mitch but will they ask him to restructure his contract?

That’s a ton of wasted cap space for a backup QB.

User avatar
Kodiak.
Posts: 6302
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2021 12:32 am

Post by Kodiak. » Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:36 pm

Translation: "even an R7 will do....". But, honestly, not sure what you expect him to say. Let's see what they do, which is what really matters.

Also, there's something to be said for honoring contracts, especially the short deals with vets.

It's also possible they'll give Trubisky permission to explore trades. Maybe if no one wants him a reasonable back-up deal can be agreed upon. And, remember, this is a team that would fall over themselves to keep Trubisky if he meant the difference between 9-8 and 8-9.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighty downs...the lifeblood of ball possession

User avatar
BouldernBun
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2019 8:21 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by BouldernBun » Wed Mar 01, 2023 1:36 am

I wouldn't go over average back up pay for Mitch. Even that might be a bit to much. I was really rooting for him to take advantage of an opportunity the beginning of last season. However, even with the Steelers multitude of problems, he is who I thought he was. I was delusional last year. That nightmare was real in Chicago. A change of venue did no good. His head is just as screwed up as it appeared while watching Bears games. He just isn't a starting QB. As a back up? Flip a coin, I wouldn't feel bad either way.

ScrantonSteel
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 4:40 pm

Post by ScrantonSteel » Wed Mar 01, 2023 2:33 am

https://steelersdepot.com/2023/02/omar- ... 23-season/

He also said this….
Which to me means he isnt saying anything.

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6496
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:33 pm

Kodiak. wrote:
Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:36 pm
Translation: "even an R7 will do....". But, honestly, not sure what you expect him to say. Let's see what they do, which is what really matters.

Also, there's something to be said for honoring contracts, especially the short deals with vets.

It's also possible they'll give Trubisky permission to explore trades. Maybe if no one wants him a reasonable back-up deal can be agreed upon. And, remember, this is a team that would fall over themselves to keep Trubisky if he meant the difference between 9-8 and 8-9.
Ya this. They likely want to trade him. Just can’t come out and say so.

At the end of the day, paying a premium for a back-up for a single year is t the end of the world.

Last year they spent all of camp on a faux “QB Battle” where two of the guys were learning the offesne while the one who knew it the best wasn’t really given a shot.

If Mitch does end up back this year the team doesn’t need to waste any ti e really getting him up to speed to start. He’s the back-up and will get back/up reps.

The rocket scientist can be brought in as number three.

The team should be able to hit the ground running.

I’d prefer that mo ey be used elsewhere but I can see the benefits of keeping him.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

Stillchest
Posts: 938
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2019 4:52 am

Post by Stillchest » Wed Mar 01, 2023 7:43 pm

955876 wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:33 pm
Kodiak. wrote:
Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:36 pm
Translation: "even an R7 will do....". But, honestly, not sure what you expect him to say. Let's see what they do, which is what really matters.

Also, there's something to be said for honoring contracts, especially the short deals with vets.

It's also possible they'll give Trubisky permission to explore trades. Maybe if no one wants him a reasonable back-up deal can be agreed upon. And, remember, this is a team that would fall over themselves to keep Trubisky if he meant the difference between 9-8 and 8-9.
Ya this. They likely want to trade him. Just can’t come out and say so.

At the end of the day, paying a premium for a back-up for a single year is t the end of the world.

Last year they spent all of camp on a faux “QB Battle” where two of the guys were learning the offesne while the one who knew it the best wasn’t really given a shot.

If Mitch does end up back this year the team doesn’t need to waste any ti e really getting him up to speed to start. He’s the back-up and will get back/up reps.

The rocket scientist can be brought in as number three.

The team should be able to hit the ground running.

I’d prefer that mo ey be used elsewhere but I can see the benefits of keeping him.
Cool.

It should help achieve the standard of mediocrity, which is the ultimate seasonal goal.

Stability over progression.

Steelers way.

Baltostiller
Posts: 2792
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 1:43 pm

Post by Baltostiller » Wed Mar 01, 2023 8:03 pm

I was listening to the fan this morning and they made some interesting points around Mitch. They think that the Steelers like to keep a veteran backup behind their young QB (a la Ben with Maddox, Leftwich and Batch). Also, if you cut Mitch, they still have to sign another backup unless they want to go into next year with KP and a rookie. Veteran backups cost ~$4-6 million. So, and don't rely on my numbers, cutting Mitch saves ~$8 million with $2 million dead money. On top of the $6 million for another vet backup, they only save $2 million. Based on those numbers, if Mitch is willing to settle into a backup role, it makes sense to extend him and spread his cap hit.

Not sure I agree but it is interesting to think about.

User avatar
jewelsongs
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 8:14 pm

Post by jewelsongs » Wed Mar 01, 2023 8:26 pm

We will do what we always do. We will let his agent see what is out there. When he realizes there is a very little market, we will extend him for 3 years with a signing bonus to absorb most of this years hit. If he moves on, we will sign Mason after he sees that there is a very little market for him.

Jizz Mop
Posts: 8463
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:44 pm

Post by Jizz Mop » Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:06 pm

jewelsongs wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 8:26 pm
We will do what we always do. We will let his agent see what is out there. When he realizes there is a very little market, we will extend him for 3 years with a signing bonus to absorb most of this years hit. If he moves on, we will sign Mason after he sees that there is a very little market for him.
Mason suitors are lining up

Don’t underestimate the great things Mason has done with the black and gold

/s

User avatar
955876
Posts: 6496
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:24 pm

Post by 955876 » Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:44 pm

Stillchest wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 7:43 pm
955876 wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 4:33 pm
Kodiak. wrote:
Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:36 pm
Translation: "even an R7 will do....". But, honestly, not sure what you expect him to say. Let's see what they do, which is what really matters.

Also, there's something to be said for honoring contracts, especially the short deals with vets.

It's also possible they'll give Trubisky permission to explore trades. Maybe if no one wants him a reasonable back-up deal can be agreed upon. And, remember, this is a team that would fall over themselves to keep Trubisky if he meant the difference between 9-8 and 8-9.
Ya this. They likely want to trade him. Just can’t come out and say so.

At the end of the day, paying a premium for a back-up for a single year is t the end of the world.

Last year they spent all of camp on a faux “QB Battle” where two of the guys were learning the offesne while the one who knew it the best wasn’t really given a shot.

If Mitch does end up back this year the team doesn’t need to waste any ti e really getting him up to speed to start. He’s the back-up and will get back/up reps.

The rocket scientist can be brought in as number three.

The team should be able to hit the ground running.

I’d prefer that mo ey be used elsewhere but I can see the benefits of keeping him.
Cool.

It should help achieve the standard of mediocrity, which is the ultimate seasonal goal.

Stability over progression.

Steelers way.
Well, we are talking bout the back-up QB here.

My point was that the more reps KP gets in camp the better.

A new back-up would need more work.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 88 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.

User avatar
RemoAZ
Posts: 3366
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 12:56 am

Post by RemoAZ » Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:04 pm

I just did a search for Cole Kelley wondering what became of him. I was hoping we'd bring him in when he was coming out instead of the guy we drafted in the 7th (can't remember his name). He's in the USFL with the Memphis Showboats. I'll have to watch if he wins the starting job. Would love to see the Wranglers come back. That's the last pro team I cheered for here. Damn that was a long time ago!
Howard Griffith had to resort to chop-blocking him during the 1997 AFC Championship Game. An incredulous Kirkland asked Griffith, “Why do you have to use cheap tactics like chop-blocking?” Griffith replied “Why do you have to be a 300-pound linebacker?”

User avatar
JackLambert58
Posts: 8731
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:12 pm
Location: Rhode Island (Behind Enemy Lines)

Post by JackLambert58 » Mon Mar 06, 2023 10:10 pm

SteelerDayTrader wrote:
Tue Feb 28, 2023 8:24 pm
I don’t know why so many of you worship this JAG bean counter

https://triblive.com/sports/steelers-gm ... backup-qb/
The next time I see someone worshipping Omar Khan on this site will be the first. Do you even truth, bro?

LOLZ
"Jack Lambert is mean and relentless wherever he goes, on and off the field! I do remember many times he would chase me in practice, but no way would I let him catch me" - Franco Harris

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic