HAHAHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Holy fucking shit, dude.
She lost. Trump lost. Walker lost.
You're rallying behind joke candidates that no one like and claiming it's a conspiracy theory when they lose.
HAHAHSHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
But there's been NO EVIDENCE of fraud. Trump had ample opportunity to present ANY evidence, in like 60+ court cases. He got creamed in every case.Dan Smith--BYU wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 8:31 pmI am saying I don't know. You are lying and say you do, but you don't because you can't.
Parrot? Trump had 60 - SIXTY - court cases to present this evidence. The evidence in most cases was so lacking the cases were dismissed outright. And by plenty of Trump appointed judges. Couldn't find even ONE friendly judge to agree with their "evidence".Dan Smith--BYU wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 4:45 amStop saying there is NO evidence. I will try to show you an analysis of the Heartland Institute/Rasmussen that showed plenty but it won't matter because you are an obedient little parrot:
Yeah yeah yeah, but did you see how hot his lawyer was?.Kodiak wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 5:39 pmParrot? Trump had 60 - SIXTY - court cases to present this evidence. The evidence in most cases was so lacking the cases were dismissed outright. And by plenty of Trump appointed judges. Couldn't find even ONE friendly judge to agree with their "evidence".Dan Smith--BYU wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 4:45 amStop saying there is NO evidence. I will try to show you an analysis of the Heartland Institute/Rasmussen that showed plenty but it won't matter because you are an obedient little parrot:
I don't care what a right wing think tank or Trump supporters claim as "evidence". None of It came close to passing judicial scrutiny, so maybe you're the one who should stop parroting rightwing bullshit.
No, I'm good. 60 judges already went through it all.
Appellate courts do not consider evidence, btw. An appeal needed to be made based on matters of process/judgements/law as ruled by lower courts. It's why you hire a good lawyer, not one out of an underwear catalog. Appeals aren't do-overs.
Again, nearly all the cases were tossed on procedural grounds including many where critics claim the merits of the evidence were considered.
And Fox news and Tucker Carlson? Did they not present evidence of their fraud claims in the Dominion case for "reasons", or did they not actually have any? Almost $1B says they had jack fucking squat in the way of facts on their side.
It's not worth the risk? Do you see how much money is involved in politics? That might be one of the dumbest things I've heard..Kodiak wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:12 pmAnd Fox news and Tucker Carlson? Did they not present evidence of their fraud claims in the Dominion case for "reasons", or did they not actually have any? Almost $1B says they had jack fucking squat in the way of facts on their side.
Voter fraud claims have been made by the right for decades, and their think tanks (and many other academics and organizations) have never presented credible proof supporting that.
Yes, fraud happens, but not on a scale to affect state & federal elections. Common sense would tell you it's really not worth the risk, especially when changing the result in your state/district might not even change the outcome.
It's "funny" to you how intelligent people want to see actual verified evidence?!? I'm shocked an intelligent person would come to any other conclusion. NO ONE, not Tucker Carlson, not Trump, not Mike Lindell has ever shown one bit of fucking proof. Not even enough evidence to fend off defamation suits (which is a really low hurdle to clear, by the way)
Actually, an article from Newsweek on historically documented cases of US Presidential elections being stolen.
Crowder had video documenting fictional addresses. What he did would need to be done on a mass scale to show voter fraud since things like witness statements and 'unmatched signatures don't matter.He traveled to Chicago, obtained a list of voters in the suspicious precincts, and began matching names with addresses. Mazo told The Washington Post:
There was a cemetery where the names on the tombstones were registered and voted. I remember a house. It was completely gutted. There was nobody there. But there were 56 votes for [John F.] Kennedy in that house.
Wasn't there an issue in 2000 with paper ballots, some fellow named Chad was involved. I remember the march on DC, the unrest, for 4 years that's all we heard aboutDan Smith--BYU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 4:28 amStrange that we could have elections on paper ballots with no problem in 1884 but with all the technology in the world and mail in ballots, its just a big black hole.
Saying you accept the result is not the same as saying there is NO evidence of a cheat, because I have shown you polls where 28 percent have admitted to it and there is no ID check and mail in ballots, a recipe for fraud.
It will always be a black hole until we go back to same day voting with ID check and paper ballots.
Gore's team tried to get electors to change their votes.Dan Smith--BYU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:00 pmThose were computer cards but enjoy your middle school emojis.
Also no one in the GOP accused Gore of insurrection or charge him with a crime for challenging the election.
Biden said he was so wracked with guilt that he concocted an excuse to avoid a celebratory lunch with one of the firm's named partners and walked into the public defender's office to ask for a job that very day. It's "the only time I ever lied," Biden told Hur on Oct. 8. Thus began, according to a New York Times report on the special counsel interview, "a career that would one day take him to the White House."
But this story is almost certainly a complete work of fiction.
Although Biden did work at a law firm tapped to defend a construction company in a negligence suit like the one he described to Hur, the case concluded in 1968, while Biden was still in law school. And the welder won, walking away with $315,000, more than $2.8 million in 2024 dollars.
Biden, whose 1988 presidential campaign collapsed amid allegations that he had plagiarized speeches and a law school paper, has a long record of embellishments and yarn spinning. Over the years, he has told several stories about himself that don't stand up to scrutiny. Those fibs range from the small and peculiar--he claimed in November 2023 that he was offered a spot on the Naval Academy's football team--to the mendacious, such as his insistence that he never spoke with his son, Hunter Biden, about the latter's foreign business dealings.
They also attempted to disqualify overseas military ballots that arrived late (not CAST late, simply DELIVERED late). You know, the party that's always railing about disenfranchisement...