The Steelers suck threads

A place to talk Steelers football and what else is going on around the NFL
User avatar
lifelongsteel
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Re: What's your beef?

Post by lifelongsteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:37 pm

Nick79 wrote:
Lifelongsteel wrote:Arians was running an offense that was getting Ben killed.


2007 10-6, Division Champ
2008 12-4, Super Bowl Champ
2009, 9-7
2010, 12-4, AFC Champ
2011, 12-4, Playoffs

Now that Bruce is gone, and Ben is safe and healthy, 8-8 TWICE.


Might have had a little to do with the D. Did you want to keep Bruce?



Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:39 pm

Not to mention the statue hop along Palmer stayed healthy and the Cards were better then us...didn't take BA to long to go from 5-11 to 10-6...but 8-8 is the standard :lol:

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:40 pm

What a dilemma.

Go balls to the wall Arians style and increase risk of injury to Ben...

Or...

Yinzer pound da rock, protect Ben, war of attrition, field position type of game plan?

Glad I'm just a fan and don't have to make these type of decisions.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:43 pm

And took a rookie QB in Indy to a pretty good season as well.

Mick
Posts: 2669
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:35 pm

Post by Mick » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:44 pm

BarryFoster wrote:What a dilemma.

Go balls to the wall Arians style and increase risk of injury to Ben...

Or...

Yinzer pound da rock, protect Ben, war of attrition, field position type of game plan?

Glad I'm just a fan and don't have to make these type of decisions.
under arians we had both of those, except the 'protect ben' part.

Pretty easy for our FO to make that decision when they could have their cake and eat it too.

swissvale72
Posts: 2946
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:43 am

Post by swissvale72 » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:46 pm

Lifelongsteel wrote:
Nick79 wrote:
Lifelongsteel wrote:Arians was running an offense that was getting Ben killed.


2007 10-6, Division Champ
2008 12-4, Super Bowl Champ
2009, 9-7
2010, 12-4, AFC Champ
2011, 12-4, Playoffs

Now that Bruce is gone, and Ben is safe and healthy, 8-8 TWICE.


Might have had a little to do with the D. Did you want to keep Bruce?


I did. Keep Ben upright at the cost of emasculating the offense. What good's a healthy QB if he can't use some of the best elements of his game.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:46 pm

BarryFoster wrote:What a dilemma.

Go balls to the wall Arians style and increase risk of injury to Ben...

Or...

Yinzer pound da rock, protect Ben, war of attrition, field position type of game plan?

Glad I'm just a fan and don't have to make these type of decisions.




I would take a dozen of Ben at his best/peak than 20 years of handing off and wasting his talent...

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:47 pm

Right on Swiss

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:49 pm

The single biggest problem is the complete and utter failure of the Oline. And I like what BA has done personnel wise in AC...

Orangesteel
Posts: 13430
Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 3:23 pm

Post by Orangesteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:55 pm

Iron_City wrote:
Orangesteel wrote:Well the primary goals of last preseason looked a whole lot like the primary goals of this preseason. Lets hope the finished product ends up a little different.

People don't care what the final score of a preseason game is. Nobody on this site is saying that. Having your starting offense and starting defense perform well, however, can be important. CAN BE.

For teams like the Seahawks and Broncos, both teams shined in the preseason because they have talent, good coaching and they execute. The Steelers looked a lot like they did last August, we said "oh, it's just preseason", and then weeks 1-8 happened.

What I'm trying to say is the teams with talent show it off in the preseason. Doesn't mean they win the game, but they show off. We didn't show much. Still waiting for Rooney to refund money from the Panther game.


I get that it's your perception

Reality is none of this translates into regular season. I live amongst a large population of Browns fans who are way too optimistic based on their teams play in preseason

Means nothing


Ok, but unless you saw something that I didn't in regards to the talent, coaching and execution this preseason, then we are basically saying the same thing. I hope to hell I'm wrong, but there is a chance the same shit I saw in August might show up on Sunday. Man I would love to be wrong here.
“Thoughts are a waste of time for me.” - Michael Pettaway Tomlin

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:58 pm

GreekSteel wrote:
BarryFoster wrote:What a dilemma.

Go balls to the wall Arians style and increase risk of injury to Ben...

Or...

Yinzer pound da rock, protect Ben, war of attrition, field position type of game plan?

Glad I'm just a fan and don't have to make these type of decisions.



I would take a dozen of Ben at his best/peak than 20 years of handing off and wasting his talent...


We have a hand off monkey available if Ben gets tired of doing it....

User avatar
Nick79
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:54 pm

Post by Nick79 » Thu Sep 04, 2014 5:58 pm

Lifelongsteel wrote:
Nick79 wrote:
Lifelongsteel wrote:Arians was running an offense that was getting Ben killed.


2007 10-6, Division Champ
2008 12-4, Super Bowl Champ
2009, 9-7
2010, 12-4, AFC Champ
2011, 12-4, Playoffs

Now that Bruce is gone, and Ben is safe and healthy, 8-8 TWICE.


Might have had a little to do with the D. Did you want to keep Bruce?


I wanted to keep him, just like Tomlin did at the end of 2012. My only complaint was that I felt like Bruce was pressured to play more conservative and we never got to see what him and Ben would and could really do if they had 110% free reign.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:01 pm

I agree Nick, except I hold Tomlin a little more culpable than you do.

User avatar
Nick79
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 2:54 pm

Post by Nick79 » Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:14 pm

GreekSteel wrote:I agree Nick, except I hold Tomlin a little more culpable than you do.


Tomlin too, but who's influencing him? Tomlin came here as a defensive guru, and he hasn't been ALLOWED to implemement anything he wants form his guru days, IMO, he's a puppet, a face, the team philosophy comes from above him, he just pretends it's him, to get that $5mil/year paycheck. He's like a concentration camp guard, "doing what he's told/following orders", even if it doesn't seem like a good thing.

User avatar
lifelongsteel
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Post by lifelongsteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:31 pm

at the time i was happy as hell that they got rid of arians. which if memory serves was the prevailing view of this board and most steeler fans.

I didn't think Ben would ever improve as long as he was playing for his golfing buddy.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:37 pm

:lol:

It is so obviously Mike Tomlins team and philosophy.

Does anyone really think he would have got the job if he wanted the run n shoot as a base O?

He has nearly 10 times the coordinator/personnel experience in the 3-4 as the 4-3...and do you really want to be among 2 or 3 teams that currently run the Tampa 2 anyway? :lol:

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 30378
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:51 pm

Lifelongsteel wrote:at the time i was happy as hell that they got rid of arians. which if memory serves was the prevailing view of this board and most steeler fans.

I didn't think Ben would ever improve as long as he was playing for his golfing buddy.

Precisely why Mike Shanahan was fired as Elway's OC. Difference in that situation is that the owner ultimately understood that Elway was the difference maker, not Reeves-- he fired Reeves and brought back Shanahan.. two Super Bowl trophies in the case.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

User avatar
lifelongsteel
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Post by lifelongsteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:23 pm

bradshaw2ben wrote:
Lifelongsteel wrote:at the time i was happy as hell that they got rid of arians. which if memory serves was the prevailing view of this board and most steeler fans.

I didn't think Ben would ever improve as long as he was playing for his golfing buddy.

Precisely why Mike Shanahan was fired as Elway's OC. Difference in that situation is that the owner ultimately understood that Elway was the difference maker, not Reeves-- he fired Reeves and brought back Shanahan.. he added a defense, a running game and wham two Super Bowl trophies in the case.


Made a little improvement for you

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 30378
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:35 pm

well, Shanahan was a better HC and personnel guy than Reeves

When Shanahan came back to Denver, they totally changed the offense and defense and drafting strategies

he went 8-8, then 13-3, 12-4 (SB win), 14-2 (SB win)

yes, he leaned on the run game and had a stud RB fall to him out of nowhere (cough *EAS* cough). Yes his D was improved (cough *PEDs* cough)-- but point is: Elway had a team built around him... Reeves was the ultimate attrition football coach who kept it close and expected Elway to pull it out at the end.
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

swissvale72
Posts: 2946
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:43 am

Post by swissvale72 » Thu Sep 04, 2014 7:53 pm

Lifelongsteel wrote:at the time i was happy as hell that they got rid of arians. which if memory serves was the prevailing view of this board and most steeler fans.

I didn't think Ben would ever improve as long as he was playing for his golfing buddy.


It was definitely the prevailing view, Lifelong. The gameday threads were freakin' ridiculous. Every play that didn't produce, people were immediately posting....Fuckin' Arians.....as though execution, of....the execution of the defense had shit to do with anything.

alancac98
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 12:41 pm

Post by alancac98 » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:03 pm

bradshaw2ben wrote:well, Shanahan was a better HC and personnel guy than Reeves

When Shanahan came back to Denver, they totally changed the offense and defense and drafting strategies

he went 8-8, then 13-3, 12-4 (SB win), 14-2 (SB win)

yes, he leaned on the run game and had a stud RB fall to him out of nowhere (cough *EAS* cough). Yes his D was improved (cough *PEDs* cough)-- but point is: Elway had a team built around him... Reeves was the ultimate attrition football coach who kept it close and expected Elway to pull it out at the end.


The way I view Tomlin with one exception - he's nowhere close to the ultimate attrition football coach. They keep it close hoping Ben can win it for them. Tell Ben to go out and put up 60 points, give him the keys to the offense, and I think you will see a different offensive team.

User avatar
lifelongsteel
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Post by lifelongsteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:15 pm

SteelerDog wrote:
Lifelongsteel wrote:Arians was running an offense that was getting Ben killed.



haleys offense has been just as bad if not worse......life threatening injury......just as many hits.....BR7 is a tough guy......the last real badass this team had since Joey Porter.....hes a warrior....he likes it.....he'll be fine


Check the games played per season stats.

User avatar
bradshaw2ben
Site Admin
Posts: 30378
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by bradshaw2ben » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:24 pm

Some of that is luck, LLS-- Perch posted the stat about the total hits ben took Arians vs Haley... was almost the same.

97.69% excluding meaningless end of season games and suspensions
90.63%

that is the percentage of games Ben has started since he became the starter, with Arians and then with Haley
“We are the stupidest fucking franchise ever.” — Smithessmokin

User avatar
lifelongsteel
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Post by lifelongsteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:42 pm

bradshaw2ben wrote:Some of that is luck, LLS-- Perch posted the stat about the total hits ben took Arians vs Haley... was almost the same.

97.69% excluding meaningless end of season games and suspensions
90.63%

that is the percentage of games Ben has started since he became the starter, with Arians and then with Haley


Surprised by that. I do know last year was the first year in a long time that he started every game.

SteelBull
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 11:58 pm

Post by SteelBull » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:54 pm

All I can say is cheap ass Rooney's!

Well that, and I think my reputation deserves a little revisionist clean up if that fat head / cock sucker Arians gets to have one! It was Himmler's fault!

guten Tag

User avatar
lifelongsteel
Posts: 3582
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Post by lifelongsteel » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:58 pm

SteelerFuhrer wrote:All I can say is cheap ass Rooney's!

Well that, and I think my reputation deserves a little revisionist clean up if that fat head / cock sucker Arians gets to have one! It was Himmler's fault!

guten Tag


:lol:

Is that your beef? Or are you still mad at Steiner?

SteelBull
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2019 11:58 pm

Post by SteelBull » Thu Sep 04, 2014 10:04 pm

If Steiner reports one more time something I don't want to hear... I will literally have him stoned.

(and not in the Colorado sense)

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:17 pm

let's not forget everone's incessant need to have a fullback.

Now that they have a guy listed on the roster at that position, all the sudden it doesn't pollute every thread about offense.

V DUB
Posts: 2765
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:22 pm

Post by V DUB » Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:34 pm

Iron_City wrote:let's not forget everone's incessant need to have a fullback.

Now that they have a guy listed on the roster at that position, all the sudden it doesn't pollute every thread about offense.


:lol:

I thought that was mostly with Mendenhall...I think the hope was that the FB would have enough vision to hit the right hole, so Mendy could just blindly follow/not spin through the hole.

Legacy User
Posts: 288947
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2019 1:19 am

Post by Legacy User » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:32 am

VanWilder wrote:
Iron_City wrote:let's not forget everone's incessant need to have a fullback.

Now that they have a guy listed on the roster at that position, all the sudden it doesn't pollute every thread about offense.


:lol:

I thought that was mostly with Mendenhall...I think the hope was that the FB would have enough vision to hit the right hole, so Mendy could just blindly follow/not spin through the hole.


Or completely whiff trying to block Clay Matthews Jr. so Mendy could fumble in the Super Bowl.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic