Agreed. Wasn’t it because the rumors of Marino snorting Coke?gojira5150 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 3:26 pm'83 draft doomed the Stillers for a long time. Could have gone from Bradshaw>Marino>Ben.Thrillsseeker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:51 amAre they due though?K_C_ wrote: ↑Thu Apr 10, 2025 4:40 pmNot sure if anyone noticed today but everybody had Allen Lazard signing with the Steelers to join his old pal Aaron Rodgers, after he became the Steelers starting QB.
Welp, Lazard just took a pay cut to remain with the Jets.
I do not think Aaron Rodgers is ever coming to PIttsburgh and I, for one, am overjoyed at that prospect.
Give me Dart, Milroe, Slough, Howard, etc. I do not give a fuck but I want a young guy waiting in the wings while Mason mentors him.
I understand Tomlin is an idiot and it probably won't work out but the Steelers are due for some luck at the QB position.
A lot of QB’s and years between Bradshaw to Ben. Let’s hope they don’t repeat that timespan!
Mark Malone, David Woodley, Scott Campbell, Bubby Brister, Steve Bono (during the 1987 strike), Todd Blackledge, Neil O’Donnell, Mike Tomczak, Kordell Stewart, Jim Miller, Kent Graham and Tommy Maddox.
But hey they thought Gabriel Rivera was gonna be a balla.
Ok this Rodgers BS
-
Thrillsseeker
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 11:42 pm
Re: Ok this Rodgers BS
- PennyBacker
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:41 pm
+1CKSteeler wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 7:07 pmWhat I don't comprehend are all the fans who are getting worked up because Rodgers isn't in a rush to sign in the middle of fucking March. What he does shouldn't impact anything the Steelers do.
They apparently don't want Russell Wilson. Joe Flacco isn't going anywhere. Rodgers isn't a long term solution so he shouldn't impact their draft evaluation at all (he probably will, but only because this franchise is incredibly shortsighted and focused on the wrong things).
The talking heads do their thing and fans bark and clap like seals.
If he were to have signed already, then the speculation period would have ended and the new narrative would be burning fuel. That does not fit the offseason timeline. One must presently embrace this incubation of nothingness hype before the draft; where something is said about a whole bunch of nothing, in hopes that nothing evolves into something, or stays nothing at all, but either way, at least there was something ... from nothing.
And then if / when he signs, the narrative of can he guide the Steelers to an NFL franchise record 22nd consecutive non-losing season (?) begins to happen. Followed by are Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf the Steelers response to the Ravens' cheat code of signing Derrick Henry last offseason? And can Pittsburgh go further than the Divisional Round, where Baltimore faded? Will there even be a playoff win?
Much of the next narrative is not ready to be dramatized until the actual games draw nearer.
Last edited by PennyBacker on Tue May 20, 2025 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- steelmann58
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:38 pm
2 others liked this
As we continue to wait it more and more pissing me off with this organization. They are waiting for a 41 year old Qb who imo does not move the needle as much as some believe. It almost as they have to know he coming because Omar states they want 4 Qb in camp and there not any Qb left to sign imo
I don't care about AR signing for my own entertainment's sake.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:23 pm+1CKSteeler wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 7:07 pmWhat I don't comprehend are all the fans who are getting worked up because Rodgers isn't in a rush to sign in the middle of fucking March. What he does shouldn't impact anything the Steelers do.
They apparently don't want Russell Wilson. Joe Flacco isn't going anywhere. Rodgers isn't a long term solution so he shouldn't impact their draft evaluation at all (he probably will, but only because this franchise is incredibly shortsighted and focused on the wrong things).
The talking heads do their thing and fans bark and clap like seals.
If he were to have signed already, then the speculation period would have ended and the new narrative would be burning fuel. That does not fit the offseason timeline. One must presently embrace this incubation of nothingness hype before the draft; where something is said about a whole bunch of nothing, in hopes that nothing evolves into something, or stays nothing at all, but either way, at least there was something ... from nothing.
And then if / when he signs, the narrative of can he guide the Steelers to an NFL franchise record 22nd consecutive non-losing season (?) begins to happen. Followed by are Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf the Steelers response to the Ravens' cheat code of signing Derrick Henry last offseason? And can Pittsburgh go further than the Divisional Round, where Baltimore faded? Will there even be a playoff win?
Much of the next narrative is not ready to be dramatized until the actual games draw nearer.
My issue is that this should have been decided BEFORE the draft for obvious reasons. Right now the coaches should be working on a breakdown of how many snaps each QB should be taking and with whom. With it being up in the air, they have to plan for two scenarios 1) with AR on the team and 2) without.
They also need to begin installing the types of plays they want to run with the primary QB. Rudolph ain't AR and vice versa. They each have strengths/weaknesses.
Considering this coaching staff sucks cock in a myriad of ways, having them spend time on things that may not come to fruition seems inefficient.
There is literally no other team in this situation, perhaps the Saints with Carr retiring, but that was unexpected. This situation is NOT unexpected...it's letting a FA call the shots. Not a good look for a lockerroom that already runs the henhouse instead of the coaches.
- PennyBacker
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:41 pm
Rodgers would require less reps than Rudolph and Will Howard, but that does not mean it may not be in the team’s best interest to have AR on the roster by OTAs.Deebo wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 2:02 pmI don't care about AR signing for my own entertainment's sake.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:23 pm+1CKSteeler wrote: ↑Fri Mar 21, 2025 7:07 pmWhat I don't comprehend are all the fans who are getting worked up because Rodgers isn't in a rush to sign in the middle of fucking March. What he does shouldn't impact anything the Steelers do.
They apparently don't want Russell Wilson. Joe Flacco isn't going anywhere. Rodgers isn't a long term solution so he shouldn't impact their draft evaluation at all (he probably will, but only because this franchise is incredibly shortsighted and focused on the wrong things).
The talking heads do their thing and fans bark and clap like seals.
If he were to have signed already, then the speculation period would have ended and the new narrative would be burning fuel. That does not fit the offseason timeline. One must presently embrace this incubation of nothingness hype before the draft; where something is said about a whole bunch of nothing, in hopes that nothing evolves into something, or stays nothing at all, but either way, at least there was something ... from nothing.
And then if / when he signs, the narrative of can he guide the Steelers to an NFL franchise record 22nd consecutive non-losing season (?) begins to happen. Followed by are Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf the Steelers response to the Ravens' cheat code of signing Derrick Henry last offseason? And can Pittsburgh go further than the Divisional Round, where Baltimore faded? Will there even be a playoff win?
Much of the next narrative is not ready to be dramatized until the actual games draw nearer.
My issue is that this should have been decided BEFORE the draft for obvious reasons. Right now the coaches should be working on a breakdown of how many snaps each QB should be taking and with whom. With it being up in the air, they have to plan for two scenarios 1) with AR on the team and 2) without.
They also need to begin installing the types of plays they want to run with the primary QB. Rudolph ain't AR and vice versa. They each have strengths/weaknesses.
Considering this coaching staff sucks cock in a myriad of ways, having them spend time on things that may not come to fruition seems inefficient.
There is literally no other team in this situation, perhaps the Saints with Carr retiring, but that was unexpected. This situation is NOT unexpected...it's letting a FA call the shots. Not a good look for a lockerroom that already runs the henhouse instead of the coaches.
Ideally, Arthur Smith and the other offensive coaches are as dedicated to game planning as you have ire about their past performance. But it also makes little sense to think about orchestrating a progression of the playbook until the schedule is released.
No matter who plays quarterback, and what plays are installed when, the most important factor of all will be player execution. This year’s offense likely goes as far as the offensive line can progress.
- steelmann58
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:38 pm
1 others liked this
The FZo put this team behind the 8 ball. Their should been a take it leave it date a while ago. And now you have put them in the same situation as 2024. You have no viable number .2 Wr on this team.
- bradshaw2ben
- Site Admin
- Posts: 29673
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
1 others liked this
Rodgers may not need the snaps, but there is zero doubt the OTHER guys need snaps with Rodgers, especially if they're going to play a different style/tempo with him on the field. It's malpractice to bring Rodgers in without giving the team the necessary time to adjust.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 9:00 pmRodgers would require less reps than Rudolph and Will Howard, but that does not mean it may not be in the team’s best interest to have AR on the roster by OTAs.Deebo wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 2:02 pmI don't care about AR signing for my own entertainment's sake.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Sun Apr 20, 2025 7:23 pm
+1
If he were to have signed already, then the speculation period would have ended and the new narrative would be burning fuel. That does not fit the offseason timeline. One must presently embrace this incubation of nothingness hype before the draft; where something is said about a whole bunch of nothing, in hopes that nothing evolves into something, or stays nothing at all, but either way, at least there was something ... from nothing.
And then if / when he signs, the narrative of can he guide the Steelers to an NFL franchise record 22nd consecutive non-losing season (?) begins to happen. Followed by are Aaron Rodgers and DK Metcalf the Steelers response to the Ravens' cheat code of signing Derrick Henry last offseason? And can Pittsburgh go further than the Divisional Round, where Baltimore faded? Will there even be a playoff win?
Much of the next narrative is not ready to be dramatized until the actual games draw nearer.
My issue is that this should have been decided BEFORE the draft for obvious reasons. Right now the coaches should be working on a breakdown of how many snaps each QB should be taking and with whom. With it being up in the air, they have to plan for two scenarios 1) with AR on the team and 2) without.
They also need to begin installing the types of plays they want to run with the primary QB. Rudolph ain't AR and vice versa. They each have strengths/weaknesses.
Considering this coaching staff sucks cock in a myriad of ways, having them spend time on things that may not come to fruition seems inefficient.
There is literally no other team in this situation, perhaps the Saints with Carr retiring, but that was unexpected. This situation is NOT unexpected...it's letting a FA call the shots. Not a good look for a lockerroom that already runs the henhouse instead of the coaches.
Ideally, Arthur Smith and the other offensive coaches are as dedicated to game planning as you have ire about their past performance. But it also makes little sense to think about orchestrating a progression of the playbook until the schedule is released.
No matter who plays quarterback, and what plays are installed when, the most important factor of all will be player execution. This year’s offense likely goes as far as the offensive line can progress.
bradshaw2ben wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 3:10 pmespecially if they're going to play a different style/tempo with him on the field. It's malpractice to bring Rodgers in without giving the team the necessary time to adjust.

- steelmann58
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:38 pm
The WR and Te need to get on the page with a new QB early in these OTT and Mini Camp.
Nah. They’ll figure it out. We ease into the first part of the season while “probing” and figuring things out so no reason to worry bout things such as this.steelmann58 wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 6:37 pmThe WR and Te need to get on the page with a new QB early in these OTT and Mini Camp.
Hitting the ground running overrated anyways.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 81 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.
- Stillerz Bar
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:33 pm
1 others liked this
Orrrrrrrr955876 wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 1:48 amNah. They’ll figure it out. We ease into the first part of the season while “probing” and figuring things out so no reason to worry bout things such as this.steelmann58 wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 6:37 pmThe WR and Te need to get on the page with a new QB early in these OTT and Mini Camp.
Hitting the ground running overrated anyways.
They could scratch and claw their way to an 8-2 start despite themselves, stumble against a clearly inferior team, seemingly figure things out on O with a 44 point, 400+ yards passing performance in a win that secures NHALS , have the coaches realize they need to retake control of play calling to rein in this crazy QB who values scoring over controlling the game with ball control and TOP and show everyone by getting their revenge win against that inferior team and THEN.... REALLY show everyone the importance of ball control by not scoring over 17 points the rest of the season and still winning....
Oops, I mean LOSING every remaining game, including another embarrassing first round playoff loss.
Now doesn't that sound fun
- PennyBacker
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:41 pm
Players and coaches deserve time to get acclimated to a field general like Rodgers, but it’s also the case that many of the guys will have their experience with Russell Wilson from last year to draw upon.bradshaw2ben wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 3:10 pmRodgers may not need the snaps, but there is zero doubt the OTHER guys need snaps with Rodgers, especially if they're going to play a different style/tempo with him on the field. It's malpractice to bring Rodgers in without giving the team the necessary time to adjust.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 9:00 pmRodgers would require less reps than Rudolph and Will Howard, but that does not mean it may not be in the team’s best interest to have AR on the roster by OTAs.Deebo wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 2:02 pm
I don't care about AR signing for my own entertainment's sake.
My issue is that this should have been decided BEFORE the draft for obvious reasons. Right now the coaches should be working on a breakdown of how many snaps each QB should be taking and with whom. With it being up in the air, they have to plan for two scenarios 1) with AR on the team and 2) without.
They also need to begin installing the types of plays they want to run with the primary QB. Rudolph ain't AR and vice versa. They each have strengths/weaknesses.
Considering this coaching staff sucks cock in a myriad of ways, having them spend time on things that may not come to fruition seems inefficient.
There is literally no other team in this situation, perhaps the Saints with Carr retiring, but that was unexpected. This situation is NOT unexpected...it's letting a FA call the shots. Not a good look for a lockerroom that already runs the henhouse instead of the coaches.
Ideally, Arthur Smith and the other offensive coaches are as dedicated to game planning as you have ire about their past performance. But it also makes little sense to think about orchestrating a progression of the playbook until the schedule is released.
No matter who plays quarterback, and what plays are installed when, the most important factor of all will be player execution. This year’s offense likely goes as far as the offensive line can progress.
Will Howard may benefit more than anyone from a later ARrival. It could allow an uptick in his involvement that may not otherwise exist. It’s also possible that Howard is going to get his reps regardless, and that Mason Rudolph’ll have to rely upon his vet savvy if AR comes through the door.
With a talent like Aaron Rodgers, locker room acceptance would be more important than practice reps right now. How is he received, how does he receive others? As long as his character does not get poisoned through media propaganda, the rest should work itself out.
We do what we do.Stillerz Bar wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 10:42 amOrrrrrrrr955876 wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 1:48 amNah. They’ll figure it out. We ease into the first part of the season while “probing” and figuring things out so no reason to worry bout things such as this.steelmann58 wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 6:37 pmThe WR and Te need to get on the page with a new QB early in these OTT and Mini Camp.
Hitting the ground running overrated anyways.
They could scratch and claw their way to an 8-2 start despite themselves, stumble against a clearly inferior team, seemingly figure things out on O with a 44 point, 400+ yards passing performance in a win that secures NHALS , have the coaches realize they need to retake control of play calling to rein in this crazy QB who values scoring over controlling the game with ball control and TOP and show everyone by getting their revenge win against that inferior team and THEN.... REALLY show everyone the importance of ball control by not scoring over 17 points the rest of the season and still winning....
Oops, I mean LOSING every remaining game, including another embarrassing first round playoff loss.
Now doesn't that sound fun![]()
Besides, no team creates situations to later be used as excuses like the Steelers.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 81 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.
- bradshaw2ben
- Site Admin
- Posts: 29673
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:51 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
2 others liked this
If they are going to run the offense like they did with Russell Wilson, don't bother bringing in Rodgers.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 3:32 pmPlayers and coaches deserve time to get acclimated to a field general like Rodgers, but it’s also the case that many of the guys will have their experience with Russell Wilson from last year to draw upon.bradshaw2ben wrote: ↑Wed May 21, 2025 3:10 pmRodgers may not need the snaps, but there is zero doubt the OTHER guys need snaps with Rodgers, especially if they're going to play a different style/tempo with him on the field. It's malpractice to bring Rodgers in without giving the team the necessary time to adjust.PennyBacker wrote: ↑Tue May 20, 2025 9:00 pm
Rodgers would require less reps than Rudolph and Will Howard, but that does not mean it may not be in the team’s best interest to have AR on the roster by OTAs.
Ideally, Arthur Smith and the other offensive coaches are as dedicated to game planning as you have ire about their past performance. But it also makes little sense to think about orchestrating a progression of the playbook until the schedule is released.
No matter who plays quarterback, and what plays are installed when, the most important factor of all will be player execution. This year’s offense likely goes as far as the offensive line can progress.
Will Howard may benefit more than anyone from a later ARrival. It could allow an uptick in his involvement that may not otherwise exist. It’s also possible that Howard is going to get his reps regardless, and that Mason Rudolph’ll have to rely upon his vet savvy if AR comes through the door.
With a talent like Aaron Rodgers, locker room acceptance would be more important than practice reps right now. How is he received, how does he receive others? As long as his character does not get poisoned through media propaganda, the rest should work itself out.
My prediction is that Rodgers gives the Steelers the finger because he knows Tomlin and Smith want to run a prehistoric offense.
#NoMoTomlin
#BecauseTomlin
#FireTomlin
#Obviously
#BecauseTomlin
#FireTomlin
#Obviously
Crossing fingers this is the case. These dipshits are hoping Rogers can get them NHALS and a token playoff appearance.
I hope he stays home. Don’t want him, don't need him.
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 81 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.
I’m on board if that goes down.But I still want AR here so he can tell Tomlin to STFU
Jibba Jabber’s offense hasn’t scored more than 7 1st quarter points in 81 consecutive games. An NFL record by far. A historic amount of “easin in”. We are lucky to have him.
I don't know. Based on his comments, Rodgers has used his superior skills of the intellect to determine Tomlin is a GREAT coach.
Rodgers may not be the savior we're looking for...
Rodgers may not be the savior we're looking for...
Rodger’s always says the right things until he doesn’t
This x 1000bradshaw2ben wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 4:50 pm
If they are going to run the offense like they did with Russell Wilson, don't bother bringing in Rodgers.
If you are not going to allow your QB to audible or not give him audibles that work with the personnel then no QB will work.
When you see the writing on the wall, you are in the toilet. -- Fred Sanford
But do you really need to change the play when all of your plays rely on guys winning their 1-on-1 match-ups?
Every play works if guys just execute. If the coaches believe that - and they absolutely do - there's no need to go changing the stinkin' play!
Last edited by .Kodiak on Thu May 22, 2025 11:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- steelmann58
- Posts: 5163
- Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2019 6:38 pm
1 others liked this
Will the 41 year old AR be allowed to call his audibles and will he be allowed to throw in the middle of the field? this has all the making of a classic joke of a season.
- Dan Smith--BYU
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:33 am
1 others liked this
Rodgers currently is attending to more current matters like weighing in on Egyptology controversies on the Joe Rogan podcast.
I can't disagree, it's more important than the Steelers.
I am deep in a rabbit hole about how much of conventional knowledge about ancient civ is wrong.
I can't disagree, it's more important than the Steelers.
I am deep in a rabbit hole about how much of conventional knowledge about ancient civ is wrong.
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
Nietzsche
Nietzsche
-
CzechSteeler
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:01 pm
1 others liked this
No and no. But he will call audibles. Throwing to middle of the field is allowed, if/when we have 8 wins and we´re looking for our SB, ie 9th win.steelmann58 wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 12:12 amWill the 41 year old AR be allowed to call his audibles and will he be allowed to throw in the middle of the field? this has all the making of a classic joke of a season.
It's bc he doesn't know him yet.
After about 2 weeks he'll know what a fuckstick fraud Tomlin is.
- Stallworth16
- Posts: 4137
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:22 pm
1 others liked this
I never wanted 41 year old Aaron Rodgers. He turns 42 in December. It’s a fine age to be a suburban dad or a travelling fool, but a terrible age to be an NFL QB.
Tomlin left the path of reason when he benched Justin Fields, 25 year old running QB, just starting to win games and find his groove. We got a few good games from declining 36 year old, 5’10” Russell Wilson and that fell apart. Now they are chasing the past again with Aaron Rodgers, it’s insane.
The path of reason now would be to play Mason Rudolph and see if we may have found a gem in Will Howard.
Tomlin left the path of reason when he benched Justin Fields, 25 year old running QB, just starting to win games and find his groove. We got a few good games from declining 36 year old, 5’10” Russell Wilson and that fell apart. Now they are chasing the past again with Aaron Rodgers, it’s insane.
The path of reason now would be to play Mason Rudolph and see if we may have found a gem in Will Howard.
I just can't reconcile this. How would officially signing change demands on his personal time? PIT wouldn't give him the time and space to attend to personal issues?Dan Smith--BYU wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 4:06 amRodgers currently is attending to more current matters like weighing in on Egyptology controversies on the Joe Rogan podcast.
I think there's only two reasons he hasn't signed. He's either not fully committed to playing this season, or still hoping for a better option than PIT. Or he wants to skip mini-camp and OTAs.
Suppose it's possible he needs another month to resolve the personal issues. But it kind of sounds like OTAs are PIT deadline, but of course they have no real leverage. If Rodgers decides not to show up until the day before the opener PIT will, obviously, welcome him with open arms.
-
W&M_Steeler
- Posts: 1604
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2019 2:55 am
1 others liked this
Why do people keep saying this? Fields wasn't "finding his groove." Fields had two horrible games against the Cowboys and Raiders before he got benched. If it weren't for a gift from the refs overturning a horrible redzone interception in the 2nd quarter of the Raiders game, Fields damn well might have been benched at halftime in that game.Stallworth16 wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 1:55 pmTomlin left the path of reason when he benched Justin Fields, 25 year old running QB, just starting to win games and find his groove.
Fields had one good half against the Colts and an OK game against the Chargers but fell apart afterwards and basically sucked as a starting QB. As bad as Wilson turned out to be, he was still better than Fields. The Steelers FO must see things similarly, because they let Fields walk for basically peanuts.
- Stallworth16
- Posts: 4137
- Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:22 pm
1 others liked this
W&M, Fields is gone now, so it’s water under the bridge, but he was benched after a win at 4-2. He had a 94 rating and was learning on the fly. His running ability is a serious weapon, and he has a strong arm. Even if you are right, Fields is gone now. We can agree that the Russell Wilson experiment crashed and burned after a great start.
You didn’t address the main point of my post, which is that chasing 42 year old Rodgers is a mistake along the same line as Wilson. We should start Mason Rudolph and see if we have a long term QB in Will Howard.
You didn’t address the main point of my post, which is that chasing 42 year old Rodgers is a mistake along the same line as Wilson. We should start Mason Rudolph and see if we have a long term QB in Will Howard.
