bradshaw2ben wrote:it's possible, although we used to get pressure on those guys with physical mismatches
That was also before this trend of completing short passes in about 2 seconds took hold of the league.
bradshaw2ben wrote:it's possible, although we used to get pressure on those guys with physical mismatches
Exactly, its a philosophy thing problem. Not talent
Djsteeler35 wrote:
Pens season started, they are much easier to cheer for
SP wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:it's possible, although we used to get pressure on those guys with physical mismatches
That was also before this trend of completing short passes in about 2 seconds took hold of the league.
SP wrote:Havoc wrote:I have only read thru the 2nd paragraph but I wanted to post.
That 2nd paragraph is fantastic, SP. Very well stated.Those chunk plays were the difference that built a 21-3 halftime lead and won Cleveland the game.
It's about chunks of yardage, boys. And I'm not talking about 4yd passes with YAC. As SP pointed out, that was the difference between the 2 offenses today. We were able to run the ball and move the chains, at least in the first half. They got chunks, and we didn't.
We had dominated possession of the football, and we had a sickening 3 point lead. And that is exactly what we deserved. The browns got what they deserved by attacking with the passing game upfield, scoring quickly and leaving us in the dust.
Fire Todd Haley
You get it. The Steelers took all of the explosion out of their own offense when they brought Haley in. The intermediate and deep passing game that Ben excelled at was written out in the name of protecting him and establishing the run. On days they do establish a run, they fail to capitalize off of it by using play action to pick up big yardage. The Browns did it to perfection and all it took was a few successful runs to set it up. Morons like Rob Rossi will blame Ben for the offensive production. Anyone with a brain would have a hard time pinning the blame on a QB that was written out of the game plan. He threw 6 passes and was down 21-3. And it's his fault the offense can't score?
955876 wrote:Exactly, its a philosophy thing problem. Not talent
It's not exactly though because it's both. You can't say the talent isnt below the line.
The left side of our oline is bad. Foster is serviceable but Beachum simply isn't an NFL LT. He's playing there by default. And since the oline works Asa unit one breakdown impacts the unit and the entire offense.
We do not have a single TE that worries a DC. Heath is a nice player and have loved him over the years but at this point he is at best a solid vet #2. He is no longer a legit #1 TE on a big boy offense.
2/3 of our WR corps had a whopping 6 career receptions coming into the season. Their lack of experience was definitely on display yesterday.
Our dline can't stop the run and puts little pressure on the QB.
Our pass rushing linebackers are no longer the star of the show which they should be given how our D is designed.
Corners are a mess and the safety play has been horrible. Mitchell has done nothing and it's clear Troy's days are very numbered.
Outside of AB, Ben, and Bell, where is all the talent?
Disagree if you choose. But point out where this team is above the line talent wise.
VanWilder wrote:
Just enough venom with a pinch of pissedoffedness.
Agree with every word.
I might give Tomlin one more season to let his guys grow, but I want Haley gassed 14 hours ago.
Didn't read the thread, been avoiding anything NFL related since 4pm yesterday.
SP wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:it's possible, although we used to get pressure on those guys with physical mismatches
That was also before this trend of completing short passes in about 2 seconds took hold of the league.
bradshaw2ben wrote:SP wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:it's possible, although we used to get pressure on those guys with physical mismatches
That was also before this trend of completing short passes in about 2 seconds took hold of the league.
how'd we get so much pressure on Manning in 05 playoff game? Brady in that game where we beat them at Heinz a couple of years ago? Our coverage wasn't so much better then.
6. Arizona (4-1). As Mike Florio said in our little NBC den Sunday night: “Why’d the Steelers ever let Bruce Arians go?” Good question, Mike. Very good question.
bradshaw2ben wrote:I heard Dulac and Tunch today-- they both vehemently insisted the following:
1. Mike Tomlin went to bat vs ownership to keep Arians after 2010; Arians retained
2. Mike Tomlin was asked to fire Arians again after 2011, Tomlin went to bat for him... he was "overruled" from above
3. "Rooneys" asked that Haley be interviewed "as a favor because of the connection to Dick Haley";
4. Tomlin made the hire
5. Noll also was ordered at times to make changes
Even after winning a SB, Tomlin didn't have the organizational say so to retain coaches of his choosing.
Rooneys are very involved in coaching choices; more than you'd think.
In that context, AR2 is the part of the equation that doesn't add up: he has no football background and was never a part of the organization's football operations before becoming CEO. For him to be involved in replacing/hiring assistant coaches or other football decisions is absurd on its face.
Congratulations! You just fired the future NFL Coach of the year and replaced him with the worst OC in the NFL. Brilliant.
SP wrote:bradshaw2ben wrote:I heard Dulac and Tunch today-- they both vehemently insisted the following:
1. Mike Tomlin went to bat vs ownership to keep Arians after 2010; Arians retained
2. Mike Tomlin was asked to fire Arians again after 2011, Tomlin went to bat for him... he was "overruled" from above
3. "Rooneys" asked that Haley be interviewed "as a favor because of the connection to Dick Haley";
4. Tomlin made the hire
5. Noll also was ordered at times to make changes
Even after winning a SB, Tomlin didn't have the organizational say so to retain coaches of his choosing.
Rooneys are very involved in coaching choices; more than you'd think.
In that context, AR2 is the part of the equation that doesn't add up: he has no football background and was never a part of the organization's football operations before becoming CEO. For him to be involved in replacing/hiring assistant coaches or other football decisions is absurd on its face.
Congratulations! You just fired the future NFL Coach of the year and replaced him with the worst OC in the NFL. Brilliant.
Thats a lot if words to call Tomlin a potted plant.
bradshaw2ben wrote:Congratulations! You just fired the future NFL Coach of the year and replaced him with the worst OC in the NFL. Brilliant.
bradshaw2ben wrote:I don't know Perch-- it supports my view of the situation: they told Tomlin the deal when they hired him: we are in charge here. You have certain responsibilities as the HC and so does the GM and so do ownership. We run an organization, not a HC power trip, so if that's a dealbreaker, feel free to say no.
IIRC, that's why Whisenhunt said he wasn't interested.
Things are different in most of the NFL these days... Coach with all the power in the organization is a rarity everywhere-- and it's even more so in Pgh.
P.S.: Apparently "The Rooneys" told Arians the OC job was his before Tomlin was hired... that's how I heard it described by Dulac. Based on what's happened since, wouldn't surprise me to learn they told Arians job was his as long as he kept a run-based offense.
Iron_City wrote:was just looking over some shit, its worse than I thought
They have 11 offensive TD's in 6 games. Eleven fucking TD's and we're almost at the halfway point. We have one more rush TD on the year than ST/D has scored. Robert Golden and Brice McCain have as many TD's as Leveon Bell. And they're supposed to be a run team. 3 rush TD's on the year. 17 sacks and 4 QB fumbles
Nine sacks in 6 games. Two each by Jervis and Worlds B Free. And Brice McCain has more pass defensed than Troy Polamalu.
bradshaw2ben wrote:late 2009, early 2010, second half of 2013
these are three example of him adjusting his strategy and deviating from attrition football
I'm only saying he has proven he will make adjustments and can press player's buttons... I concur that he's not doing it now and that he is stubborn to the nth degree. There's no argument.
bradshaw2ben wrote:I wouldn't be shocked if Colbert is either fired or asked to rebuild his wing of the organization.
Tomlin doesn't have the power in the organization for the owner to actually look him in the face and say it's all your fault.
I think the owner will meddle, decide who stays or goes, and set a mandate for what they are supposed to do.
This is bad news.