Poltargyst wrote:And you have to decide how much to blame them for the TD after Ben's INT.
A supposedly Top 10 D would've held them to 3pts or created a TO on a QB named Blake Bortles but I digress...
Poltargyst wrote:And you have to decide how much to blame them for the TD after Ben's INT.
Suwanee88"[quote="SteelDrama wrote:Suwanee88 wrote:steelmann58 wrote:Worst news it being reported that Tomlin is going to bring back his whole Defensive staff according to GD
Absolutely unbelievable to me.
Me too, Suwanee. Maybe Art II and Bob Nutting are one in the same. Next they’re going to announce Mike Mitchell will return as the starting free safety
It's not like you can go out and get a MILB overnight to plug the hole. Or a new safety at the end of the season. Watt already had a shitload on his plate, and you want to add more as an ILB? I wonder about mccullers, and why the fuck he sat on the bench for most of the season. Do other organizations shelf players simply for insurance?DP39 wrote:COR-TEN wrote:So a question for all you x's and o'c nerds scrubbing tape.
What exactly went wrong with the defense? Execution? Preparation? Game planning? Stupid players? Lack of coaching up of athletically talented players? What?
I'd like some specifics. We all know what happened last year. We also know the Jags used PA quite a bit with the threat of fournette. But what's up with a lack of gap integrity and sloppy tackling? Do coaches just ignore that?
It boiled down to lack of talent through the middle of the defense, imo. Or, like b2b said, a DC that's was unwilling to experiment with pulling talent from other positions of strength to help out down the middle. Hargrave (Dline), Spence and Mitchell were some of the biggest issues.
COR-TEN wrote:It's not like you can go out and get a MILB overnight to plug the hole. Or a new safety at the end of the season. Watt already had a shitload on his plate, and you want to add more as an ILB? I wonder about mccullers, and why the fuck he sat on the bench for most of the season. Do other organizations shelf players simply for insurance?DP39 wrote:COR-TEN wrote:So a question for all you x's and o'c nerds scrubbing tape.
What exactly went wrong with the defense? Execution? Preparation? Game planning? Stupid players? Lack of coaching up of athletically talented players? What?
I'd like some specifics. We all know what happened last year. We also know the Jags used PA quite a bit with the threat of fournette. But what's up with a lack of gap integrity and sloppy tackling? Do coaches just ignore that?
It boiled down to lack of talent through the middle of the defense, imo. Or, like b2b said, a DC that's was unwilling to experiment with pulling talent from other positions of strength to help out down the middle. Hargrave (Dline), Spence and Mitchell were some of the biggest issues.
Lynch wrote:It's a sad day mein homies, a sad sad day.
This. I don't disagree that there were issues, but how much of them should be placed at Butler's feet?SteelKnife wrote:Why didn't we have better depth at ILB? Serious question. Given Shazier's injury history, why was that the best we had? Why hasn't Dupree taken snaps inside? He's useless outside. Why hasn't Mitchell? Even if just for emergencies.
COR-TEN wrote:This. I don't disagree that there were issues, but how much of them should be placed at Butler's feet?SteelKnife wrote:Why didn't we have better depth at ILB? Serious question. Given Shazier's injury history, why was that the best we had? Why hasn't Dupree taken snaps inside? He's useless outside. Why hasn't Mitchell? Even if just for emergencies.
I'm pissed at the defensive performance like everybody, but I'm also trying to be sensible in my analysis. Is it really all Butler's fault? If McCullers was that bad, why didn't they release him instead of Harrison? Who's decision was that? Butler, although responsible for the defense, hasn't shown as much ineptitude as Haley. His schemes were a bit different than lebeau, but I guess I'm just more patient and willing to give him another shot. Haley used up his shots long ago.
DP39 wrote:COR-TEN wrote:So a question for all you x's and o'c nerds scrubbing tape.
What exactly went wrong with the defense? Execution? Preparation? Game planning? Stupid players? Lack of coaching up of athletically talented players? What?
I'd like some specifics. We all know what happened last year. We also know the Jags used PA quite a bit with the threat of fournette. But what's up with a lack of gap integrity and sloppy tackling? Do coaches just ignore that?
It boiled down to lack of talent through the middle of the defense, imo. Or, like b2b said, a DC that's was unwilling to experiment with pulling talent from other positions of strength to help out down the middle. Hargrave (Dline), Spence and Mitchell were some of the biggest issues.
KC wrote:COR-TEN wrote:This. I don't disagree that there were issues, but how much of them should be placed at Butler's feet?SteelKnife wrote:Why didn't we have better depth at ILB? Serious question. Given Shazier's injury history, why was that the best we had? Why hasn't Dupree taken snaps inside? He's useless outside. Why hasn't Mitchell? Even if just for emergencies.
I'm pissed at the defensive performance like everybody, but I'm also trying to be sensible in my analysis. Is it really all Butler's fault? If McCullers was that bad, why didn't they release him instead of Harrison? Who's decision was that? Butler, although responsible for the defense, hasn't shown as much ineptitude as Haley. His schemes were a bit different than lebeau, but I guess I'm just more patient and willing to give him another shot. Haley used up his shots long ago.
I'm still shocked they didn't move Watt inside and give AN OBVIOUSLY FRESH Harrison a shitload of plays at his regular spot.
Just so dumb.
W&M_Steeler wrote:I think Harrison hurt Porter's feelings, so Tomlin and Butler tried to teach Harrison a lesson. Whoops.
DP39 wrote:Like it or not, losing Shazier kept Butler his job. Replacing Shaz with Spence is the scapegoat he needed and gets him another year, at least, as DC. Also, having Dirty Red hurt helped a little as well.
COR-TEN wrote:This. I don't disagree that there were issues, but how much of them should be placed at Butler's feet?SteelKnife wrote:Why didn't we have better depth at ILB? Serious question. Given Shazier's injury history, why was that the best we had? Why hasn't Dupree taken snaps inside? He's useless outside. Why hasn't Mitchell? Even if just for emergencies.
I'm pissed at the defensive performance like everybody, but I'm also trying to be sensible in my analysis. Is it really all Butler's fault? If McCullers was that bad, why didn't they release him instead of Harrison? Who's decision was that? Butler, although responsible for the defense, hasn't shown as much ineptitude as Haley. His schemes were a bit different than lebeau, but I guess I'm just more patient and willing to give him another shot. Haley used up his shots long ago.
KC wrote:Jeemie wrote:I think you misunderstood there.
The key word is ONLY Haley was let go.
Should have been defensive staff changes as well is what is being said...not saying Todd should have been retained.
I hate EVERY SINGLE COACH on the Steelers staff with a bitter passion after that game last Sunday, but after Shazier went down (likely permanently) it was pretty clear we weren't going to be winning anything important. Our defense, simply, wasn't going to be anywhere near good enough and when you take away the ONE GUY on that defense that can actually make plays and create turnovers, your defense is going to be FINISHED.
I HATE Keith Butler but until we get better players at MLB, LOLB, safety, CB and likely NT and maybe DE (Tuitt SUCKED COCK this year) our defense isn't going to be any good.
At all.
Jeemie wrote:COR-TEN wrote:This. I don't disagree that there were issues, but how much of them should be placed at Butler's feet?SteelKnife wrote:Why didn't we have better depth at ILB? Serious question. Given Shazier's injury history, why was that the best we had? Why hasn't Dupree taken snaps inside? He's useless outside. Why hasn't Mitchell? Even if just for emergencies.
I'm pissed at the defensive performance like everybody, but I'm also trying to be sensible in my analysis. Is it really all Butler's fault? If McCullers was that bad, why didn't they release him instead of Harrison? Who's decision was that? Butler, although responsible for the defense, hasn't shown as much ineptitude as Haley. His schemes were a bit different than lebeau, but I guess I'm just more patient and willing to give him another shot. Haley used up his shots long ago.
I give him no pass.
All the defense had to be was a modicum or competent. It didn’t have to be all-World. The offense was way good enough to make up for that.
New England won a Super Bowl with the 32nd ranked defense, but it was coached up to be competent in the post-season.
New Orleans won a Super Bowl with a lousy defense that was coached up to be opportunistic and caught lightning in a bottle.
The time to win the Super Bowl was NOW...we proved we could hang with New England...it was on Butler to make sure the defense wasn’t a huge weak link.
He failed. He and his entire staff should be OUT.
GreekSteel wrote:KC wrote:Jeemie wrote:I think you misunderstood there.
The key word is ONLY Haley was let go.
Should have been defensive staff changes as well is what is being said...not saying Todd should have been retained.
I hate EVERY SINGLE COACH on the Steelers staff with a bitter passion after that game last Sunday, but after Shazier went down (likely permanently) it was pretty clear we weren't going to be winning anything important. Our defense, simply, wasn't going to be anywhere near good enough and when you take away the ONE GUY on that defense that can actually make plays and create turnovers, your defense is going to be FINISHED.
I HATE Keith Butler but until we get better players at MLB, LOLB, safety, CB and likely NT and maybe DE (Tuitt SUCKED COCK this year) our defense isn't going to be any good.
At all.
But even when you put up 42 pts?? i dunno i thought our defense would be slightly better at least than giving up 45 at home coming off a bye week to BB and the jags juggernaut offense.
GreekSteel wrote:KC wrote:Jeemie wrote:I think you misunderstood there.
The key word is ONLY Haley was let go.
Should have been defensive staff changes as well is what is being said...not saying Todd should have been retained.
I hate EVERY SINGLE COACH on the Steelers staff with a bitter passion after that game last Sunday, but after Shazier went down (likely permanently) it was pretty clear we weren't going to be winning anything important. Our defense, simply, wasn't going to be anywhere near good enough and when you take away the ONE GUY on that defense that can actually make plays and create turnovers, your defense is going to be FINISHED.
I HATE Keith Butler but until we get better players at MLB, LOLB, safety, CB and likely NT and maybe DE (Tuitt SUCKED COCK this year) our defense isn't going to be any good.
At all.
But even when you put up 42 pts?? i dunno i thought our defense would be slightly better at least than giving up 45 at home coming off a bye week to BB and the jags juggernaut offense.
Jeemie wrote:I don’t absolve the staff/FO for their failure to address ILB which as was said WE identified as a critically weak area at the beginning of the season.
And the utter lack of a pass rush sure is going to make their decision to release Deebo short-sighted.
But that didn’t mean their defense had to devolve to the point of being no better than actually not being on the field.
steelmann58 wrote:Worst news it being reported that Tomlin is going to bring back his whole Defensive staff according to GD
Orangesteel wrote:I love that this idiots legacy is two failed fourth and less than a yarders in a must win game and breaking his pelvis in a bar altercation at the Tequila Cowboy on NYE.
Good riddance.
W&M_Steeler wrote:BarryFoster wrote:We allowed only 38 points.
I'd say 35 points, when you consider the fact that the D forced a 3 and out after the ill-conceived onsides kick. Tomlin put them in that spot.
955876 wrote:Losing 45-42 THIS week would have sucked but would not have surprising at all.
Losing 45-42 LAST week while playing at home and to a team led by Blake Bortles is not acceptable.
Someone on D needs to be fired.
955876 wrote:Losing 45-42 THIS week would have sucked but would not have surprising at all.
Losing 45-42 LAST week while playing at home and to a team led by Blake Bortles is not acceptable.
Someone on D needs to be fired.
Jeemie wrote:DP39 wrote:Like it or not, losing Shazier kept Butler his job. Replacing Shaz with Spence is the scapegoat he needed and gets him another year, at least, as DC. Also, having Dirty Red hurt helped a little as well.
If this is true, then it’s further evidence that this braintrust will never win a Super Bowl.
Because as B2B pointed out, great coaches brook no excuses, but figure out a way to get things done.
This was a Super Bowl-caliber offense. All it needed to compete for a ring was a defense that could be just passable. It essentially became no better than having nobody on the field...that is HUGELY damning of the DC.
Belichick would have had Butler and his staff out on their collective asses at the end of LAST year.
bradshaw2ben wrote:If it means a freeing of Ben that results in a Super Bowl win or two, I could GAF about who is head coach.
KC wrote:I HATE Keith Butler but until we get better players at MLB, LOLB, safety, CB and likely NT and maybe DE (Tuitt SUCKED COCK this year) our defense isn't going to be any good.
Jeemie wrote:Belichick would have had Butler and his staff out on their collective asses at the end of LAST year.